LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Acadamic question

(Querist) 28 January 2018 This query is : Open 
As per initial survey revenue record(1958),survey no:353/1 is of 4 acres owned by 3 members .
survey no: 353/2 is of 8 Acres owned by 6 members (1.Mr.Ram, 2. Mr.B, 3.Mr.Dasaradh, 4.Mr.D, 5.Mr.E, 6.Mr.F)
but each person share is not mentioned in that record.
then, Re-survey done in 1967.
In between 1958 to 1967 there is no survey record.
As per Re-survey record(1967),survey no:353/1 is sub divided into 4 sub divisons of 1acre each (353/1,353/2,353/3,353/4)
survey no:353/2 is sub divided into 8 sub divisons of 1acre each (353/5,353/6,353/7,353/8,353/9,353/10,353/11,353/12).
it is clearly mentioned that S.No 353/10 is owned by Mr.Putra son of Mr. Lakshman in re-survey revenue record(1967).

Mr.Dasaradh has two sons Mr.Ram and Mr.Lakshman.
Mr.Ram has 3 sons, namely Mr.ramesh, Mr.suresh, Mr. Naresh.
Mr.Lakshman has 1 son ,namely Mr.Putra.

In 1974, Mr.Ravana bought 1 acre of land from Mr.ramesh son of Mr.Ram. in that sale deed it is mentioned that out of 8 acres in s.no 353/2, 1 acre of land sold by Mr.ramesh son of Mr.Ram to Mr.Ravana. there is no specific detail about the 1 acre survey number in that sale deed.

S.no: 353/10 is mutated into the name of Mr.Putra's wife and it is in the enjoyment of her.
due to old age of Mr.putra's wife , she left the village and staying with her children in city.
by taking this advantage Mr.Ravana son is trying to occupy the land of Mr.Putra's wife by showing the sale deed mentioned above.

now, Mr.putra's wife went to the court , and got the interim injuction order against Mr.Ravana's son.
Mr.Ravana's son submitted sale deed in the court and claiming S.No 353/10 because of no clarity about 1 acre land survey number purchased by Mr.Ravana.

Will Ravana's son get succeded in this case?

kavksatyanarayana (Expert) 28 January 2018
Survey number 353/2 of Ac.8.00 which was re-surveyed as 353/5 to 12. There are six (6) members for this property though each person share is not known. But you left three names and the relationship between them is not mentioned in your query which is must to advise.
N.K.Assumi (Expert) 29 January 2018
Sorry, no answer for academic query, as LCI deals with hard and raw facts and cases.
Guest (Expert) 29 January 2018
Well Advised by Expert Mr.Kavksatyanarayana
krishna (Querist) 29 January 2018
For 353/2 There are 6 members. In that 6 Members Mr. RAM and Mr. Dasaradh are Elder son and father. Other 4 Members are different persons. After re-survey 353/2 sub divided as 353/5 to 353/12. In 353/5 to 353/12 Elder son Share is Not mentioned. But Elder son Mr. Ram's Elder son Mr. Ramesh sold 1 acre to Mr. Ravana. Whereas younger son Mr. Lakshman's son Mr. Putra Share is mentioned as 353/10 In re-survey Record.
krishna (Querist) 29 January 2018
dear kavksatyanarayana,
i have provided further information.

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :