Whether its wise to file the Miscallneous petition for discovery new documents in Review Application

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 24 May 2011 This query is : Resolved
I have filed the Review Application against the order of the CAT which was gone against me I have depicted the last para of the order passed by the CAT

"At the same time, it requires pertinent notice that the applicant is indicated to have applied for the obtaining of the information under the RTI Act, for the first time, in the year 2007. He was already in employment, though on adhoc basis, for the last about eleven years. The selected candidates were holders of indicated placements in that very organization. The applicant has not been able to indicate how can he wriggle out of the predicament of having to explain the refrain on his part in filing of the O.A and in not filing of the plea for information under the RTI Act from 2001 to 2007.
In the light of the foregoing discussion, we are of the considered view that the O.A. filed by the applicant is time-barred and shall stand disposed of accordingly."

My review Application has been admitted and issued notices to the respondent. Now there are certain more documents which has brought into my knowledge through RTI Applications such as supplying of manipulated information and non disclosure of information when the RTI Act was not in enforce

Please advise whether its wise to file the Miscallenous Petition for discovery of new documents which was not attached in the Main petition?

Follow Query

Report Abuse

M/s. Y-not legal services (Expert) 25 August 2015
anonymous/academic queries can not be answered..

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries