w.p.c.1022/89
Guest
(Querist) 26 April 2008
This query is : Resolved
pl let me know about the last order passed in W.P.C. 1022 OF 89 pending in the honble supreme court.
H. S. Thukral
(Expert) 26 April 2008
Are u looking for the judgement in IA 173 passed on 28-04-06 ?
Kiran Kumar
(Expert) 27 April 2008
well friend just log into www.supremecourtofindia.nic.in
here u can have access to all the final and daily orders of the Supreme Court.
click on judgments u ll be moved to another page then again click on supreme court then enter ur case no. or parties name etc........u ll get ur answer.
SANJAY DIXIT
(Expert) 08 September 2008
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
ORDER
I.A. No. 226 of 2008:
8
This is an I.A. filed by the Government of National Capital
Territory of Delhi, for clarification of order dated 22.1.2008
passed by this Court, in regard to the implementation of
recommendations of the Shetty Commission so far as it relates to
staff members working in the subordinate courts.
The report of the Shetty Commission, as regards the
Judges of the subordinate courts, was filed in the year 1999 and it
was made effective from 1.7.1996. The Shetty Commission also
made its recommendations with regard to the members of the
subordinate court staff in March, 2003. So far as the date of
implementation of the recommendations of the Shetty Commission
with regard to members of the subordinate court staff, we make it
clear that it shall be made effective from 1.4.2003.
I.A. No. 226 stands disposed of accordingly.
I.A. No. 71A, 135-136, 137-138 & 142:
Pursuant to our directions given earlier, a composite
compliance chart was prepared in regard to the implementation of
various recommendations made by the Shetty Commission. As
regards the perquisites, allowances etc. payable to the staff
members of the subordinate courts, 19 recommendations were
classified separately and each of the States was directed to file
separate affidavit regarding implementation of the
recommendations of the Shetty Commission. Many State
Governments have not filed proper affidavits in this regard. States
like Sikkim, Punjab, Haryana and Union Territory of Chandigarh
9
have complied with the recommendations of the Shetty
Commission. As regards other states and Union Territories, it is
submitted that the discussion is going on between the High Courts
and the State Governments.
We must say that the report was submitted on 31.3.2003 and we
have been giving repeated directions to implement the
recommendations but most of the States have not complied with.
The general objection of the State Governments is that there is
difficulty in implementing these recommendations because the
State Governments are short of funds. We do not think that by
implementing the aforesaid recommendations, the State
Governments will have to incur heavy financial burden since only
reasonable recommendations have been made in the report and the
States and Union Territories can look into these recommendations
and take proper decision at the earliest, at least within a period of
three months from today. We direct the States and Union
Territories to file affidavits indicating the latest status on or before
20.10.2008. Before that the Registrar Generals of the concerned
High Courts shall hold discussions with the State Governments and
Union Territories in regard to the implementation of the
recommendations of the Shetty Commission and take a final
decision in the matter. It is made clear that no further time shall
be granted to implement the recommendations of the Shetty
Commission.
We have already passed an order in I.A. No. 226 finalising
a date from which the recommendations of the Shetty Commission
10
with regard to the staff members of the subordinate courts are to
be made effective. Copy of this order shall be sent to the Registrars
of each High Court so that they may take timely steps.
Post the case on 23.10.2008.
