(Querist) 16 August 2009
This query is : Resolved
Expert: A V Vishal , i AM SATISFIED WITH YOUR ANSWERS STILL I NEED TO KNOW FEW DETAILED CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE 2005 ACT,I DONT KNOW SECTIONS IN WHICH WOMENS RIGHT IN ANCESTROL PROPERTY SEEKS
AS YOU SAID "Although your query is unclear on what section you seek a clarification, but yes, women have rights in ansectral property. However, according to clarification of the Hon'ble Chennai HC and the Supreme Court of India, The amendment of 2005 is prospective in nature and not retrospective".
regarding my query you have furnished the above details, one thing could you make me clear..."according to clarification of the Hon'ble Chennai HC and the Supreme Court of India, The amendment of 2005 is prospective in nature and not retrospective." can you give me a detailed outlet of this clarification MADE BY CHENNAI HIGH COURT AND S.C.OF INDIA
A V Vishal
(Expert) 16 August 2009
I am giving the case of Chennai HC and link to the Hon'ble SC judgement kindly refer Chennai HC REVIEW PETITION NO.37 OF 2008 1. Smt. Bagirathi 2. Smt. Hamsaveni 3. Smt. Premavathi 4. Smt. Sarguna 5. Smt. Saroja 6. Smt. Suryakumari .. Petitioners Vs. 1. S. Manivanan 2. S. Venkatesan .. Respondents Review Petition filed under Section 114 and Or.47 Rule 1 CPC., against the judgment dated 29.9.2006 in OSA.No.281 of 2001. The above case law can be viewed on Indiankanoon.org SC Case law http://indiankanoon.org/doc/419509/