LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

question to court

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 22 November 2010 This query is : Resolved 
sir i am in dilemma that
1)whether it is correct to ask some explanatory questions to court during process on the side of husband ?

2) whether it is correct to ask the details of their presumption or inference taken only on prima facie accepted trial on allegation made by wife?

3) will it be correct to put a request to that the allegated suit filed by wife should be tested including all the necessary sections of ipc/crpc i.e.34, 120B,
167 (investigation cannot be completed in 24 hours),
182 (offenses committed by letters),
191 (transfer on application of the accused),
197 (prosecution of judges and public servants),
199 (defamation),
200 (examination of complainant),
201 (Magistrate not competent), 204,
209 (triable exclusively by Court of Session), 211,
249 (absence of complainant),
250 (compensation for accusation), 306,
321 (withdrawl from prosecution),
323 (commit to Session Court), 355, 378, 379,
384 (summary dismissal of appeal),
392 (judge of Court of Appeal are equally divided),
406 (criminal breach of trust), 420,
467 (period of limitation), 471,
497 (adultery), 499,
500 (defamation),
504 (insult with intent to provoke a breach of peace),
506 (criminal intimidation), RCR
Damage recovery case u/s 9 of CPC (law of torts):
will the court take adverse opinion against husband?
R.Ramachandran (Expert) 22 November 2010
Dear Anonymous,
You are supposed to give reply to the case agaist you.
If you are not satisfied with the outcome of the case then you have to prefer appropriate appeal.
Except these two things, you are no one to question the Court as to how the Court presumed or inferred (you do not even know whether they presumed or inferred - probably the court might have satisfied with the averments by the parties) the matter.
You better confine yourself to the main case instead of getting in to any other expedition.
s.subramanian (Expert) 22 November 2010
yes.
R.Ranganathan (Expert) 22 November 2010
I agree with Mr. R.Ramachandran. You have no right to speculate anything about the Court and its Officers. You have appeal provisions if you require.
Guest (Expert) 22 November 2010
I agree with Mr. R.Ramachandran
Advocate. Arunagiri (Expert) 24 November 2010
I agree.
Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 25 November 2010
yes


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :