Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 25 February 2010
This query is : Resolved
Thanks sir. but i am unable to understand that since now sons are under no such obligation why they r required to pay as under sec-6(4) courts can not proceed against them ?? can they refuse to do so where the debt was taken by the karta for personal benefits . should not it be discharged from the property of father only primarily.kindly clear my doubt sir..
Trouble Logging in? Try following the given steps -
1. Visit your inbox to find a confirmation mail from LAWyersClubIndia.
2. Click on the confirmation link and confirm your signup