Hindu succession act

basavaraj shiromani (Querist) 23 March 2016 This query is : Resolved
Genealogy.
N
B T

C I S F V

P L
B B
K
S
I

Patilki Inami lands granted in favour of N. His sons B & T never separated during their life time. after their death. the heads of two branches C and F partitioned the properties as kartas in their names. the mutation was effected in the year 1945. Now on the strength of said mutation the Children are denying the share of son to I on the strength that the mutation was effected in their father's name alone prior to hSA 1956 came in force. therefore the son of I in B branch cannot claim share as he is not coparcener. whether he is entitle for his share

Follow Query

Report Abuse