Finger prints

Siraj udeen (Querist) 10 December 2023 This query is : Resolved
Was there a practice in Tamilnadu during 1957 that if the subregistrar personally knows the executant and if the document to be registered is duly signed by the executant then SR can make a note as 'personally known' on the fingerprint register and need not insist on fingerprint? I checked with a retired person and he clarified that it is true and there was a standing instruction at that time to this effect. How do I reconfirm this? Can we access the standing order?

Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/fingerprint-753126.asp

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Quick Summary

A query arose regarding a 1957 practice in Tamil Nadu where sub-registrars might have omitted fingerprints on the register if they personally knew the document's executant and it was duly signed. A retired individual confirmed this practice existed due to a standing instruction. The discussion suggests consulting Tamil Nadu's Registration Manuals to reconfirm this historical procedure.

kavksatyanarayana (Expert) 10 December 2023
Yes. The retired person said is true. See Part I and II registration Manuals of Tamilnadu State as some are different from one state to another state.

Siraj udeen (Querist) 10 December 2023
Thank you sir. I will look for the manuals.

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Expert) 11 December 2023
You may ascertain the fact s as suggested and then revert with yor actual query in this regard.

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Expert) 11 December 2023
I this same case

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/fingerprint-753126.asp

why repeating same query.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries