CRPC U/S 391 READ WITH 401

JANAK GANDHI (Querist) 18 April 2009 This query is : Resolved
OUR LAWYER DID NOT EXHIBITED IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS IN THE TRAIL COURT THOUGH FILED DURING THE COURSE OF VARIOUS HEARINGS AND ALSO THE SESSION COURT DID NOT CONSIDER.NOW WE HAVE MOVED TO HIGHCOURT THRU IA AFTER FILING CRIMINAL REVISION U/S 391 READ WITH 401 TO ENTERTAIN THE DOCUMENTS ALREADY ON RECOERD.
CAN YOU ALL EXPERTS SUGGEST SOME DECISIONS OF SC OR MPHC ENABLING TO QUOTE.TKS

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Jaswant Singh (Expert) 18 April 2009
Marking a document exhibt does not proved the documents. To prove a document, the procedure is prescribed under Evidence Act & CPC. Even non marking as exhibit,if otherwise it is proved, shall be considered by the court

Message likes : 1 times

JANAK GANDHI (Querist) 19 April 2009
THANKS AN APPLICATION IS FILED U/S 391 BEFORE THE HONBLE HIGH COURT.IS IT MANDATORY TO HEAR THE SAME BEFORE FINAL HEARING AND WHETHER IF ACCUSED PROVES THE TRUTHNESS THAN THE COURT WILL ACCEPT FOR FINAL HEARING?

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now