LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Appeal

(Querist) 05 March 2012 This query is : Resolved 
sir two days back is sent one query that i filed null and void which was allowed on the grounds that she was already married and which is in subsisting. now that lady filed appeal in highcourt. she applied grounds like
1) i have not proved according to order 6 of cpc. (Sir what is the meaning of order 6 of cpc)
2) even she said that i have not proved order 10 of cpc. (Meaning of order 10 of cpc)
3) not called priest who perfomed the marriage (sir i am not eyewitness to that first marriage. more ever her lawyer did not asked any of that question like who is priest, call priest etc(who is no more itseems). to me or to her first husband. moreever she did not entered the witnessbox.)etc.
she did not enter the witnessbox and also filed one memo that there is no evidence from her side. sir please enlight me that above grounds are valid or not. sir i came to know that a third party can prove the previous marriage or any marriage. plz forward that citation.
Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 05 March 2012
You should put this query in the same thread so that the previous discussion may be taken into consideration while replying to your subsequent query.
Shonee Kapoor (Expert) 05 March 2012
Her appeal would fail if it is on these grounds.

Regards,

Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com



You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :