Mutual undestanding agreement
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 23 September 2011
This query is : Resolved
My wife has left my house and is staying at her parents house because she wants my salary account to be in Joint name with her.
For this, she fixed my telephonic conversation and face to face meeting with her advocate.
I had a face to face as well as telephonic conversation with her advocate. Her Advocate told me that my wife would come with me at my home only when i jointly share my salary account with her. And that if i agree, then I need to sign a Mutual Understanding agreement. I absolutely refused on this.
Then soon in some days, my wife filed a petition thru the same advocate, for interim maintenance and RCR in family court. In the petition, there is absolutely no mention of the Joint Salry Account issue.
Now I need to prove it to the court that though i was ready to take my wife back, her advocate had blocked me with the unreasonable Joint Account demand.
Though I have an itemised bill, which has got the call details of the call that i made to her advocate, i think i need something more.
I don't have any evidence regarding the face to face meeting but have an itemsied bill with me as an evidence.
Is there any way to prove my conversation with the advocate.
Thanks.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 23 September 2011
There is no need to rely much on the telephonic conversation with the advocate.
Since it is suit for restitution of marital life , you better appear and ask the court to pass decree in her favour on the basis of your consent to take your wife back.
Then see how there strategy backfires her.
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 23 September 2011
Excellent idea you have now from Mr. Barman.
Advocate Rajkumarlaxman
(Expert) 24 September 2011
100 % right Our expert states the correct way to handle the same. when he has RCR it will be a backfire to herself. just attain the court and accept the application
R.Ramachandran
(Expert) 24 September 2011
Yes. Now a days the clients think that they can win their case by bringing in trivial issues to the notice of the court. In this case, as rightly pointed out by Mr. Barman, the question is that of restoration of conjugal right. As told by the queriest there is no mention of (and rightly so) any joint account etc. Therefore, the querist has to readily agree for RCR and then bring the wife along.
Shonee Kapoor
(Expert) 24 September 2011
I would disagree with the other experts here, there is a great chance that she has some malafide intention.
This advocate is not giving her the right advise, and I smell greed on his part too.
Be cautious, even if you are taking her back, get it written in the agreement/ statement that there was no harassment/ demand of dowry/ violence etc.
Regards,
Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com
malipeddi jaggarao
(Expert) 25 September 2011
A wife who demands sharing the salary through joint account is not a wife in real terms. When she left your home on frivolous grounds, where is her for asking restitution? It appears she is going strategically and you should be careful and equally strategic. Please adopt the course of action suggested by Mr.Barman and others, but you should be very careful in dealing with such persons.
