138 ni act is personal not linked to govt integrity

Santhosh Kumar (Querist) 02 July 2025 This query is : Resolved
Respected Experts,

Greetings to all.

I humbly seek your legal guidance and support. I lost my Central Government job due to a case filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. However, the matter is purely personal and private in nature, and has no connection whatsoever to the integrity, conduct, or functioning of the Government of India office where I was employed.

My matter is now pending before the Hon’ble Telangana State High Court and is listed on 04-06-2025.

I earnestly request any kind advocate or legal expert to kindly share landmark Supreme Court judgments that uphold the principle that cases under Section 138 NI Act pertain to private financial disputes and do not amount to misconduct affecting government service or integrity.

Your valuable inputs may help me restore my position and dignity. I shall remain ever grateful to those who guide or support me in this regard.

Warm regards,
D.V.N. Santhosh Kumar
Ex-International Volleyball Player
Formerly with IA&AD (Indian Audit and Accounts Department)

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Quick Summary

An individual who lost their government job due to a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case is seeking legal guidance. They emphasise that the case is a private financial matter and unrelated to their conduct or the integrity of their former government office. The query asks for Supreme Court judgments that support this distinction, hoping to regain their position.

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Expert) 03 July 2025
You have repeated the same query again in this thread.

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Expert) 03 July 2025
repeated

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/138-ni-act-is-personal-not-linked-to-govt-integrity-766501.asp

Dr. J C Vashista (Expert) 06 July 2025
You have again posted same query on 02.07.2025 stating, inter alia, that, "My matter is now pending before the Hon’ble Telangana State High Court and is listed on 04-06-2025." wherein the date is about a month back, isn't it?

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries