Mal administration and conspiracy gaiant the bona fide appli
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 08 November 2009
This query is : Resolved
Dear Sir,
I applied for Leases and mineral concession before State Govt. Following first in time principal u/s 11(2) of MMDR Act 1957, I have established my claim. Now State Govt. head and its IAS officers are playing havoc snatching such rights from me declining me on false and filthy grounds. Their indulgence in unfair acts and mal- administration and obstructing the delivery of justice and delaying the matter has been proved. Yet they are playing above law and by taking fresh plea victimizing me. A police case has also been registered against the rival applicant u/s 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34. Whereas 120 B also attracts and head and bureaucrates and state functionaries are euqally guilty of practicing fraud by using fake/tampered to seek the lease.
What should I do against the rival applicants and State who in convinnace with Mineral Mafia, Bhu Mafia are victimizing me. Please provide solution with relevant case law and action plan for instant relief please.
Regards
Bhargava
Against the State Govt./Central Govt. and bureaucrates indulged in above game of conspiracy exposed to the hilt. No getting any relief from Mining tribunal.
What should I do ? High Court delhi, High Court MP, CVC, Lokayukta, or
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 08 November 2009
You have not written in which state the aforesaid mines are situated. However, I suggest to file a writ before the High Court of that particular State wherein the dispute is pending clearly elaborating all the fact leading to dispute and relief claimed by you. So far course of action i s concerned, first of all collect all papers connected with the matter and then contact a competent lawyer and then follow all instructions of him.
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 11 November 2009
Dear Makkad ji,
Thanks for valued reply. Matter belongs to MP. In the case Mining tribunal has tried the criminal part already subjudiced before District and session Judge, Jabalpur (MP). It is mela fide exercise of power beyond capacity. Fraud committed which rendered the whole proceeding void has been nullified and order immersed with fraud and collusion element has been revived. of fraud Accused of forgery has been declared innocent liable to be exonerated holding. More over, It is encroachment upon the firm direction of judicial magistrate by interferance by Tribunal wo is not competent to deal with the matter subjudiced before a competent. Even High Court, Supremecourt normally do not do so. In the order,Tribunal also tried to justify the illegal acts into legal acts. UOI Vs SP Anand SC 1998, It is held that justifiability of any act arises when It has been done under the constitution or law. Whereas Illegal mining has been termed termed as legal to the advantage of the accused. It ius a fit case for CVC in addition to writ/appeal before high court. Please provide suitable case law on these two legal issue. Pl provide ur mobile number/email address
Regards
AK Bhargava Mobile 09425157452
brijkishore.bhargava@gmail.com
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 11 November 2009
Dear friend,
Waiting for response and valued suggestion.
Regds
AK Bhargava.
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 15 November 2009
Dear experts,
Kindly refer the issue raised on mal-administration and advice sought on unbecoming conduct of quasi judicial authorities that in the zeal of favouring of party with under a package deal how law of the land and superior authorities are set a naught willfully flouting the rules and showing scant respect for them. Really corrupt practices of quasi-judicial authorities, destruction of facts, abuse of process of law, jumping the set principals of justice, and encroachment and usurpation of powers of other competent authorities even judicial authorities interfering in firm direction of subjudices case matter has become a challenge for the country......
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 18 November 2009
Dear friends,
No reply on the issue raised by me as yet. ????????
Kindly spare some time to address it for common good please.
Rgds
AKB
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 05 December 2009
Dear Freinds,
Erosion in quality of justice. Protection to a guilty in quasi-judicial proceedings ???????Who is responsible whether guilty or system or both are eqqually guilty????????
Shri makkad ji and other friends, inviting your kind atention and Awaiting your valued suggestion and comments on the issue.
Regards
AKB
