SC (Supreme Court)

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 01 April 2011 This query is : Resolved
According to Various supreme court decisions, giving of reason is not necessary for supreme court because it is last court and there is no superior court to test the validity or justification of reasoning of the order.

Can any body give me the 1 or 2 case law the hollow text of the subject mentionedabove.

Also if the giving the reasons is not necessary in short (Speaking Order) cann't we say it is against the nature jutice rule ?

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Advocate. Arunagiri (Expert) 01 April 2011
Who said giving of reason is not necessary for supreme court?

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Can non advocate (ordinary person) represent in court of law
Precedence value of supreme court assumption in judegment
Complaint of high court judge and loss of faith in judicial system
Remand of labour matter to labour court for the second time on same issue after 18 years.
Remand of labour matter to labour court for the second time on same issue after 18 years.
Supreme court judgement
Document rejected at appellate court at admission stage
Panjab and haryana high court and
Limitation ended in summer vacation of supremec court , will the vacations counted in holiday ?
About language of supreme court for annexures