LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Supreme COurt Judgment on stilt parking

(Querist) 25 March 2011 This query is : Resolved 
Mr. Vijayan Pl advice 100% Similarity in Pancholi Co-Op Housing Co-op Society Ltd: and my society. Pancholi Society My society
2003 1993 OC issued
2003 1993 Society Regd
56 flats 168 flats
28 stilt parking. 72 Stilt Parking
3 SOld bef OC several bef OC
25 sold after regd 40% sold after Regd
SC says, the only rights remains with the builder to sell unsold flats after the registration of the society.

In my society Out of 70 stilt parking 38 having 38 stilts (one each) and 16 having 32 Members rent Stlt Pakg on L&L without agreement and registration. Some having two stilt parking with one vehicle, kept 2nd stilt unused.
Sri Vijayan.A (Expert) 26 March 2011
Dear Suhail,
I hope this question continues from a previous one.
If you still believes that the judgement in other case shall favour your case, you can refer this.
The data given by you are comparable and can be applicable in both the cases.
I feel it is similar in all aspects, however, I fear to tell any further advice without going thru the full text of the judgment.

In this circumstance, I strongly advice you to consult a Lawyer of your region in person.
He may give you some strong and clear suggestions.
Thank you.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :