138-NI EXPERT LAWYER

anonym (Querist) 26 July 2011 This query is : Resolved
PLEASE HELP

Dear All,
I have been falsely framed u/s138 at Tis Hazari Court.
Although my case is strong technically but due to negligence of 2 earlier counsels, my case has gone in several complications.

First counsel delayed filing of reply for 3 hearings. A cost was imposed and I had to change my counsel.

The second counsel did file-but it the procedure was all wrong. Another 2 dates gone.
In the process the cross examination of complainant never happened and my exam in Chief has started(done in partial).

PLEASE SUGGEST ME GOOD ADVOCATE WHO IS AN EXPERT IN 138 CASES AT TIS HAZARI.

WITH DUE RESPECT - I WANT AN ADVOCATE WHO IS A 'KIDA' IN 138 CASE ALONGWITH TAXATION EXPERT.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

N. AKSHAY BERI (Expert) 26 July 2011
YOU CAN CONTACT MR. ANAND SINGH, MOBILE NO. 9868347568 WHO ALSO WORK AT TIS HAZARI AND HAVE EXPERTISE IN THE FIELD.

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 26 July 2011
Every lawyer is 'Kida' in the eyes of one person and has no courage to become not 'Kida'in the eyes of some another. You cannot get any solution to your problem as you are not facing any legal problem as on date. Change of lawyer is not a solution to any problem.

In my view, there was no need to file reply to complaint. Why to disclose your defence openly to the complainant? I think you might have forced your earlier counsels to file it and those might have refused and so a need arose to replace them with new one.

Anyway, you without changing your counsel can also summon complainant for his cross-examination as per Cr. PC provisions even after closure of prosecution evidence.

Try to create faith in others and self-confidence.

Guest (Expert) 26 July 2011
i agree with mr Makkad

anonym (Querist) 26 July 2011
Sir-
I beg to differ-
With no offence to anyone-I am using the word KIDA simply because some advocates are well versed with the procedures of certain types of cases.
I am a person who believes in teamwork-in this case my advocate and myself.
Unfortunately my 2 earlier counsels- clearly a casual approach was made. They simply did not do the right thing at the right time.
This has resulted in my strong case taking a long detour and unncessarily making it uncertain.
I do understand that I should trust my advocate but if basic mistakes are repeated then i think alarm bells start ringing.
This reaction is coming out of sheer concern.
Finally I believe in myself and that is why I am even ready to fight it by myself(please do not read this as over-confidence)
I am just leaving no stone unturned before its more late. In the process i will have to face adverse comments and perceptions- which is fine.
I have a clear goal in mind- I HAVE TO WIN THIS CASE BECAUSE I AM TRUE.
BUT THE SAME HAS TO BE PUT FORWARD IN A RIGHT MANNER.

Ajay Bansal (Expert) 27 July 2011
Not a fit question for a law-expert.

DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g (Expert) 27 July 2011
Some facts seems to have gone wrong since there is no cross of accused.

DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g (Expert) 27 July 2011
Yes it is not all required for the accused to file his reply or face cross, you have to demolish the case of complainant which is easy.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries