Cross examination query
sunnyonemorevictim
(Querist) 27 June 2015
This query is : Resolved
In a false 498a case, complainant (PW1) cross examination to be done. There is an allegation in FIR about additional dowry demand( DP4) but during the complainant chief examination she has not mentioned anything on additional dowry demand. In the FIR, it is a single liner allegation saying additional dowry was demanded and no other associated incidents with it
Does defense counsel need to cross examine on this additional dowry demand ? or it need not be cross examined since this allegation was not mentioned during chief
What would be the right questions for the defense counsel to counter the false allegation of additional dowry demand.
Please provide your valuable feedback. Thank you !
ADV-JEEVAN PATIL, MUMBAI
(Expert) 27 June 2015
1)When FIR corroborates additional dowry menans it is on record. It has to be erazed by proving wrong. 2)To teach advocate is inapropriate. He will n should do his job appropriately.
ADV-JEEVAN PATIL, MUMBAI
(Expert) 27 June 2015
1)When FIR corroborates additional dowry menans it is on record. It has to be erazed by proving wrong. 2)To teach advocate is inapropriate. He will n should do his job appropriately.
ADV-JEEVAN PATIL, MUMBAI
(Expert) 27 June 2015
1)When FIR corroborates additional dowry menans it is on record. It has to be erazed by proving wrong. 2)To teach advocate is inapropriate. He will n should do his job appropriately.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 28 June 2015
Cross examination is complex and task associated with intelligence and full case file has to be referred. Consult your lawyer.
