Slp supreme court interpretation of the order
dheepak srinivasa
(Querist) 07 July 2012
This query is : Resolved
PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF THIS ORDER MEANS THE LEAVE TO SUE HAS BEEN GIVEN GRANTED IN THE MAIN CRP 2691 OF 2011.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
For Petitioner(s) Petitioner-In-Person
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Application for permission to appear and argue
in person is allowed.
The petitioner who is appearing in person
seeks permission to withdraw the special leave
petition with liberty to agitate the matter against
the main order passed in CRP (PD) 2691 of 2011 by the
High Court. Permission is granted. The special
leave petition is dismissed as withdrawn accordingly.
HOW SHOULD I PROCEED FURTHER.
Rajeev Kumar
(Expert) 07 July 2012
Yes the permission is granted to sue the case
R.K Nanda
(Expert) 08 July 2012
Though SLP is dismissed but permission is granted to contest the other case.
