document

ashok (Querist) 12 August 2018 This query is : Resolved
in a matter before the court, the respondent to get a favourable order placed some document along with written statement as such the case was dismissed but later on when an application was moved by petitioner showing fakeness of document the court recalled its order and in due course held the respondent guilty..
(quantum of punishment is yet pending)
My query, Respected Lawyers, is whether the court would also "consider" punish on account of furnishing wrong document or it is necessary for petitioner to move separate application under crpc 340 later ?

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Dr J C Vashista (Expert) 13 August 2018
The court can not take suo moto cognizance but you will have to move an application u/s 340 Cr PC.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Can notary document admitted as evidence in court of law
Sanctity of notarised document
Payment not made despite having document us
E document authentication
Rti document usage
Certified coy of an alleged forged document under custody of
Unregistered document before court
Birth certificate issue as per legal document in delhi
Legal document through rti
Loan document date can be earlier then disbursement date ??