Importance of section 66 evidence act

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 27 September 2024 This query is : Resolved
यदि किसी सिविल मुकदमे में आपके प्रतिवादी ने मुकदमे में आपसे कोई मूल दस्तावेज तलब करवाने हेतु आदेश 11 rule 12 and 14 के तहत कोई प्रार्थना पत्र प्रस्तुत किया है तो आपके मना करने पर वह सीधा ही धारा 65 के तहत द्वितीयक साक्ष्य के लिए कोर्ट को आवेदन कर द्वितीयक साक्ष्य की अनुमति प्राप्त कर सकता है या उसको इससे पूर्व धारा 66 साक्ष्य अधिनियम का नोटिस भी आपको देना जरुरी रहेगा ? यह नोटिस कितना जरूरी है ? क्या इस सम्बन्ध में कोई रुलिंग है ?

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Quick Summary

This discussion explores the significance of Section 66 of the Evidence Act in civil lawsuits, particularly concerning secondary evidence. It clarifies that if a party requests original documents under Order 11 Rules 12 and 14 of the CPC, and the other side refuses, the requesting party may apply for secondary evidence under Section 65. The necessity and implications of providing notice under Section 66 are also examined, along with the court's discretion in allowing such evidence.

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Expert) 27 September 2024
If the opponent wants to file any additional document, he has to give a copy and notice to the plaintiff for giving them opportunity to record their objection.
Order 11 Rules 12 and 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) are independent rules that deal with documents and discovery in a court case.
The court if satisfied by the arguments heard from both the sides may pass an order either to allow or to dismiss the same on merits at its own discretion.
If allowed then the opponent may be permitted to mark them as his side exhibits in the ongoing civil suit

P. Venu (Expert) 22 October 2024
The query is too hypothetical. What is the context for this 'leading' query?

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries