LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

evaluation of domestic violence

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 17 July 2011 This query is : Resolved 
i hav put a case of domestic violence.i had also given ddr and mlr of the atrocities made.the court had given orders that he should not come near the hosu.the day i filed domestic violence i requested to the court to put stay on his property .during the pendency of the case he had put propery on his relatives name .the court has now told me to give evaluation of what i want for compensation .all my gold is with them.how should i make evaluation and how much should i ask ,his salary is more than 3 lakh rupees and should i tell the court to put his property on my childrens name which he has put on his relatives name
Tajobsindia (Expert) 20 September 2012
Since the queriest is not interested in pursuing the query after placing it here from last 1 year, hence closing this query by hitting Resolved drop down.
Guest (Expert) 20 September 2012
Dear Tajobsindia,

I wonder, when nobody tried to solve the problem of the querist, instead of providing any solution, how you have assumed the query to have been solved when the querist has not declared so? Not only that, you have declared on behalf of several other querists that their queries have been solved without any solution on those queries.
Tajobsindia (Expert) 20 September 2012
Mr. Dhingra,

These is a huge meaning difference between "not pursuing" and "solved".

You are using 'solved' word which is not the right word to use here. Also "queriest" means a person asking a query with reference to Expert section where Expert reply to a "query".

I used word "not pursuing" from last 1 year by no one (which includes you and by me).

Here "several others" means several other "Experts".

If we as Experts colly. fail to answer a 'query' from last 1 year and on top "queriest" himself does not show any interest to pursue his own query then before questioning me you could have solved yourself the persons query !

If you have right to question me so do I have same rights as we both were cleared as Experts for this section by Admins. of LCI.

I am sure now rest of fellow Experts including you will question my above explanation and probably still no one including me will attempt to solve this query even after 1 year. I followed what Court does when a suit matter gets dismissed “due to non pursual by party”

You probably will not question Court after 1 year but you may question me which I found amusing after 1 year.

In that case I am done clarifying / explaining here and now you may react as per your wishes or choose to close this irrational Q & A or still not satisfied then you including all Experts here may directly tell Mods. to delete my a/c what else you expect me to do seeing after 1 year a OPEN query ????.

Rgds.
Guest (Expert) 20 September 2012
Dear Tajobsindia,

I hope you would like to reply just one simple question for my information, do you have any right or authority to declare on behalf of the querist or administrator of the site that the matter pertaining to his querry or problem is resolved?


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :