Anonymous
30 August 2019 at 23:57
Hello members,
While resigning from my office. My organisation gave me a clearance certificate which had a clause which stated that the organisation had cleared all the dues which was not true. But, they denied giving me my experience letter without signing it. Hence, to get my papers, I wrote a proper corporate mail and along with that after signing on the clearance certificate. I did mention that I haven't received the pending salary amount.
I did that after asking two different lawyers, both suggested that I write a mail n while signing the certificate write the situation regarding pending salary.
Please guide me, if I can file a legal notice against them in the labour court?
Banuvara Raja
30 August 2019 at 23:23
Instead of paying at lower court where warrant is issued our advocate has gone and paid in state commission. We hv paid half which is 1 lakh. Rest of the amount should we pay? Rest of amount is 1 lakh.
Anonymous
30 August 2019 at 22:54
Hello, I would like to learn more about this situation I'm finding myself in.
My father passed away recently and assigned me as the nominee of his bank account with balance say Rs 100.
Few days later after he passed away a deposit occurs into my fathers account, say an amount of Rs 20. Then, the owner of the account from where the money was deposited filed a police complaint that the transaction was fraudulent and that Rs 20 be returned back to him.
The police went ahead and froze my fathers bank account for investigation.
I would like to know, if it is legally allowed as per the law for the police to freeze the entire amount in my fathers account for which my father assigned me as the nominee? or the police can only freeze the Rs 20 for his investigation purpose. I would really appreciate anyone who can help me with the answer. Thank you so much in advance.
Prashant
30 August 2019 at 17:58
Hi all
I am the manufacturer and I had supplied goods with Rs 200000 to the dealer and he didn't make the payment for 9 months and at last he gave us the cheque of the total amount and those were bounced due to insufficient funds. And the next day I called him and asked for the payment he said give me another one month I will make the payment. But still he has not made the payment.
Now I wanted to send him a notice, but the lawyer said the time period to issue notice is within 15 days which I have missed.
Now what is the procedure furthur i can take to recover my money
Kindly guide me on this
Thank you
Lawrence William
30 August 2019 at 16:32
Recently police filed an ipc 170 ,406,419 and 120/B. Later on they realized that the officers are real. Now, they are not approaching the officers nor omitting the ipc�s . What would happen further in the case?
Anonymous
30 August 2019 at 14:23
We have an advocate staying in our society , who in drop of the hat sends notices , inimidates us with defamation and litigation . He has not been cooperating with the society development , and challanges each and everyhting through notice . Due to this the committe is fed up and members do not want to come forward to be a part of MC .
We effected members are tired of him throwing his weight around on small pretexts and constantly being harrassed with notices . We had a plumbing audit for leakages , he refused to allow the security and plumber to check the same .
mahender
30 August 2019 at 08:49
Hello Sir,
Original suit filed @ District and Sessions Court, Hyderabad and case is pending since 14-03-2019, its been 5 months now and we have not granted Injection order temporary or permanent. Case status still shows at summons. Please suggest what to be done to get Immediate Injection or some sort of relief to stop illegal possession/construction from respondents.
Case History: We petitioner are legal heirs of said property which belongs to our Grand Father/ Father, respondents have created a illegal decree with fake signatures of our ancestors, now legal heirs of respondents have made development agreement with builder.
Appreciate expert advice and inputs of above case to get Injection order ASAP
regards,
Mahender
ksr prasad
29 August 2019 at 21:24
My mother wants to write a WILL for distribution of all her moveable property acquired from her husband,mother and mother-in-law in the form of gold and cash. As she is not sure about how much exactly will be the balance(cash and gold) at the time of execution of the WILL, can she write in terms of percentages for the beneficiaries? Kindly clarify.
KSR Prasad
Hyderabad
minsal
29 August 2019 at 18:20
Dear Expert Sirs,
in a SRA Project a plot of land was de-marketed and dedclared as a reserved plot for PG. the Builder has not yet transferred said plot in favour of BMC as the project is not yet complete. the Tehsildar issued a demand notice for revenue on the entire plot of land against which the builder approached the office of Tehsildar and showed the notification about the declaration of said part of land reserved as PG the Tehsildar the asked to pay the revenue amount of the plot deducting the revenue of the PG plot area and builder has paid the amount.
After a year they again issued a notice of demand along with the arrears stating that you have not transferred said plot in favour of BMC hence you have to pay the amount with penalty.
The builder has filed an appeal u/s. 247 before Addl. Collector which was decide against the builder and the Addl. Collector has directed the Tehsildar to take action and issue notice with demand of double of penalty.
the Builder who has contested the matter in person now approached me to challenge said order of Addl. Collector. This is my first matter in the subject act. I need your guidance to contest the matter. please help me for this.
Thank you
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Specific relief act
वादी ने विनिर्दिष्ट अनुतोष अधिनियम की धारा 6 के तहत कब्जा प्राप्ति का वाद प्रस्तुत किया और विकल्प में भी स्वत्व के आधार पर कब्जा प्राप्ति का अनुतोष माँगा, विचारण में वादी ने अपने बयानो में बेदखली की दिनाँक वाद पत्र में अभिलिखित बेदखली की दिनाँक से भिन्न बताई, विचारण न्यायालय ने वादी का धारा 6 का वाद तो मियाद बहार मानकर खारिज कर दिया परन्तु वादी के पक्ष में वैकल्पिक अनुतोष के लिये कब्जा प्राप्ति की डिक्री जारी कर दी । (मैं प्रतिवादी हुँ )
निम्न बिन्दुऔं पर citation नहीं मिल रही है�
(1) धारा 5 व धारा 6 अलग अलग उपचार प्रदान करती है इसलियें दोनो धाराऔं को एक ही वाद में संयॊंजित नहीं किया जा सकता है ।
(2) न्यायालय अभिवचनों से भिन्न, बयान में बताई गई बेदखली की दिनाँक को cause of action नहीं मान सकता है ।
(3) धारा 6 व 5 के तहत संयुक्त रूप से दायर किये गये किसी वाद में यदि वादी धारा 6 के वाद में असफल हाे जाये ताे उसके पक्ष में धारा 5 के तहत स्वत्व के आधार पर भी काेई डिक्री पारित नहीं की जा सकती है और यदि उक्त प्रकार की काेई डिक्री पारित की गई है ताे वाे सही नहीं है।