Jamadar Revansidd
21 November 2019 at 18:48
Dear sir/madam,
On dated 5/11/2019 rdpr Karnataka released an additional select list of PDO. In that additional list there should have been my name but my name is not mentioned. So I want to get stay order on recruitment process . Please help me
Nikhil Kurkure
21 November 2019 at 14:50
Please share sathe khat draft in marathi for selling agricultural land
Anonymous
21 November 2019 at 14:22
Sir my friend Anandi Sharma has adopted a son ram before ger marriage
later she married Sunil Sharma
now Sunil Sharma adopts a son as he states that Anandi his adopted in her personal status and Ram would not be his son and and Sunil Sharma has adopted a boy Karthik from orphanage in Secunderabad is the option of Karthik valid because under Hindu law if a son is there the parent cannot adopt One more son
CHANDRA SEKAR V
21 November 2019 at 13:10
My lands have been acquired under National Highways act 1956. For enhanced compensation, NH Act refers Arbitration act 1996, for determination of enhanced compensation. Now the Arbitrator (Arbitrator appointed by the Central Govt) has rejected the petition for enhancement. Against the Arbitration award, the land losers can approach the Civil court under CPC. Now my doubt is whether the District Judge can or the District Judge has the power to enhance the compensation or he should remand back the matter to the Arbitrator only?
Anonymous
20 November 2019 at 22:41
If i apply for NOC from DC for petrol pump then Noc will be the name of land owner or the applicant
Veerendrasai Ampala
20 November 2019 at 22:22
Dear Sir/madam,
My father was in state government service. he was expired while in service. And now mother getting Family pension. my question is while my father in service period he was suspended for 3 months. in the service register they have wrote AWARDED PP1 FOR 2 YEARS WITH EFFECT ON FUTURE INCREMENTS AND PENSION AS HIS QUIT WAS PROVED. THE PERIOD OF HIS SUSPENSION IS TREATED AS NOT DUTY. please suggest me in this issue.
Anonymous
20 November 2019 at 19:50
IPC 406, 420 and 465 --- summons case or warrant case ?
Anonymous
20 November 2019 at 09:32
Hi Experts,
I have purchased a land near pune and did the kharedi and paid full amount to the Agent/Developer. Now the are not replying and also not giving the 7/12 utara. Please let me know who to obtain the 7/12 using Kharedi Khat.
Thanks,
Raj
SANJAY SINGH
20 November 2019 at 08:52
Can I convert a Proprietor Company to Private Ltd. Company and use the Experience of Proprietor Company ? [Executed Work Order/Supply Order, Financial Position (Balance Sheet/ Profit & Loss Account etc.)] of Proprietorship Company in Private Ltd. Company as Credential for getting New Work Orders/Supply Orders for Converted Private Ltd. Company as Experience under following situations? 1. The Chairman of the Private Ltd. Company is the Proprietorship in Proprietorship Company.
This question is in reference to the judgement of New Horizons Limited Vs. Union of India (1995) 1 SCC 478
Paragraph 23 of New Horizon Limited reads as under:
Quote:
23. Even if it be assumed that the requirement regarding experience as set out in the advertisement dated 22-4-1993 inviting tenders is a condition about eligibility for consideration of the tender, though we find no basis for the same, the said requirement regarding experience cannot be construed to mean that the said experience should be of the tenderer in his name only. It is possible to visualize a situation where a person having past experience has entered into a partnership and the tender has been submitted in the name of the partnership firm, which may not have any past experience in its own name. That does not mean that the earlier experience of one of the partners of the firm cannot be taken into consideration. Similarly, a company incorporated under the Companies Act having past experience may undergo reorganization as a result of merger or amalgamation with another company, which may have no such past experience, and the tender is submitted in the name of the reorganized company. It could not be the purport of the requirement about experience that the experience of the company, which has merged into the reorganized company, cannot be taken into consideration because the tender has not been submitted in its name and has been submitted in the name of the reorganized company, which does not have experience in its name. Conversely, there may be a split in a company and persons looking after a particular field of the business of the company form a new company after leaving it. The new company, though having persons with experience in the field, has no experience in its name while the original company having experience in its name lacks persons with experience. The requirement regarding experience does not mean that the offer of the original company must be considered because it has experience in its name though it does not have experienced persons with it and ignore the offer of the new company because it does not have experience in its name though it has persons having experience in the field. While considering the requirement regarding experience it has to be borne in mind that the said requirement is contained in a document inviting offers for a commercial transaction. The terms and conditions of such a document have to be construed from the standpoint of a prudent businessman. When a businessman enters into a contract where under some work is to be performed he seeks to assure himself about the credentials of the person who is to be entrusted with the performance of the work. Such credentials are to be examined from a commercial point of view which means that if the contract is to be entered with a company he will look into the background of the company and the persons who are in control of the same and their capacity to execute the work. He would go not by the name of the company but by the persons behind the company. While keeping in view the past experience he would also take note of the present state of affairs and the equipment and resources at the disposal of the company.
Unquote:
Thanks.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Tax rebate on home loan
I wish to take tax rebate on interest of home loan being primary borrower which I had taken for construction of house . But the land is in the name of my mother who is also co-borrower in the home loan.