Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

TANGO KILO   14 November 2014 at 17:02

Premature discharge from Airforce

Dear sir If someone has completed 8 years of service,current grade pay 2400, and as per service rule no body can go out of service before initial engagement;20year.If anyone so desire he can try for 5400Rs payscale.my question is that if any other way to go out side legallly.
i have no compassionate ground.

Arunav   14 November 2014 at 16:53

Lease of residential property

Dear Sir,

Kindly inform what all documents to be seen for the ownership of a property while entering into lease for a residential.

The owner has only provided certificate of possesion from the landlord.No other document is available. Kindly advise.

BEENA SINGH   14 November 2014 at 16:45

To transfer the name on 7/12 extract

Matter is as under:

The actual owner of land is Mr. A and his name was there on 7/12 extract. Thereafter, A sold the said land to B (i.e to Builder ) vide registered sale deed.

after obtaining the possession of said land builder constructed the building thereon and sold all the flats to flat purchasers.

After formation of the society of said building, builder handed over said plot of land along with building to society by registered conveyance deed.

However, builder had executed the said conveyance deed 10 years ago.

Now on the evident of that conveyance deed with the builder, society wants to transfer its name on 7/12 extract. However, talathi is not ready to transfer the name of society as, the name of Mr. B (Builder) was not transferred to 7/12 extract when he bought it from A. (i.e actual owner of land).

Now talathi is saying to transfer the name of society first you need to transfer the name of builder thereafter we can transfer it to society.

We had given all the proofs to talathi that builder had handed over the said land to society by deed of conveyance and it is accepted by him but his opinion is that he cannot transfer the name of society without transferring the name of Builder even though there is a proper of deed of conveyance.

Now the builder is not traceable and to transfer the name of builder on 7/12 extract he can only give the application.

Kindly advise me what is the further step that society can take to transfer its name on 7/12 extract.

namrata kaur   14 November 2014 at 15:39

Right to agriculture land for daughters in uttrakhand

Dear sir,
I,here by,want to know the act by which daughters are deprived of right to agriculture land in uttarakhand even if it is owned by father only,after the death of father.

mayank   14 November 2014 at 14:06

Publishing a circular in newspaper

Dear All,

Please let me know the mandatory requirements for publishing a circular in newspaper.

I want to publish that - please don’t lend any money to my father and he is mentally incompetent. In case if anyone still lends money to him then nobody is liable/responsible for that debt.

Member (Account Deleted)   14 November 2014 at 13:21

Limitation act, 1963

Under Article 65 of Limitation Act, claim to land property in case you have title to the property is 12 years, after which diverse possession can be claimed on such land.

In my case the construction was done on the land by me vide Commencement Certificate dated 9 Jan 2001, so my limitation period will commence 1 year after that. My 12 years are complete on 9 Jan 2014.

However there is a police complaint made by land owners on 8 Feb 2001 (this does not affect me) and a letter to the Talathi on 1 Sept 2004 merely informing him about the occupation and telling him to not transfer the 7/12.

Does this affect my limitation period

HARSH   14 November 2014 at 13:00

Llp - change in designated partners

Dear Sir,

I want to change the Designated Partners in existing LLP which is Registered in Mumbai with Capital of Rs 100,000

Please guide me through the process -

Further, Deed of Admission is required to be executed or Whole LLP Deed shall be executed afresh ?

Further, If only deed of admission is required to be executed, then How ?

It is to be printed on Legal Paper and Franking should be done or not ?
And if franking is to be done , then of how much Rupees

Further, after franking, stamp duty is also to be paid ?

If yes then how much ?

Please help.

dskiran   14 November 2014 at 12:30

Validation of agreement on rs 50 non judicial stamp papers among 4 on brothers

Respected Sir, A,B,C & D are own brothers. They have Rs 100/- ancestral property(house & agricultural land) which was given by their father in 1964 and it was registered in revenue office as (ABCD)combined property.
In 1993 A forcefully made an agreement on Rs 50 non judicial bond paper by threatening B,C & D. As A-61%, B-19% C-13% D-7%. But it is not registered yet now. From the last 21 years every one is enjoying their own property by paying taxes on combined bill paper. Will agreement on Rs 50 non judicial stamp papers among 4 on brothers valid in court or not kindly answer my query sir thank you

Rohit_talukdar   14 November 2014 at 10:53

Trial on ipc 376/417

Dear sir,

This is further to my last query regarding trail of my friend under section-376/417.
FIR dated 27.05.2013.

Last week examination of prosecution witness happened.

PW1 – Examination in Chief

1.0 From the October’ 2011 we (with Accsd) meet each other, exchanged phone no. We keep in touch over phone regularly. Our friendship grow-up. Then this friendship turned into love affairs.

2.0 Accused promised me to marry. As I am 24 years old then and I completed Bachelor degree from “X” college, I consented to that proposal. Promise of marriage was with in 2011 to march’ 12.

3.0 Then we were in a room of “Y” hotel on 03.04.2012. There our physical intimacy grownup. We met and cohabited there. The room no. was 25.

4.0 I requested Accused to inform the matter to his parents and he did the same as told by him. I also informed to my parents.

5.0 I and accused signed in the register of the hotel as of our name but I changed my surname.

6.0 I alone visited the hotel but I did not found our name in the register as it was destroyed. Then Accused told me that he and his brother-in-law did the same.

7.0 Later accused refused to marry me. I had tried our best but matter was not settled.

8.0 15 day’s prior to the marriage of accused with another girl, accused threatened me.

9.0 Then on 28.05.2013 I lodged this complain. Marriage of the accused was 27.05.2013.

CROSS Examination

1.0 Neither in161 nor in 164 nor FIR this room no. 25 of the hotel is mentioned.

2.0 Neither in 164 nor in FIR the matter “signing in the hotel register and destruction of Evidence” mentioned. (161 checked. But same was not in 161 statement also).

3.0 Neither in 161 nor in FIR the statement of threatening by accused is mentioned but same is mentioned in 164 statements. (Again 164 checked. But same was not mentioned).

4.0 VG knew that the accused was in service at Calcutta during that time.

5.0 VG also working in a beauty pearlour near the hotel (5 mins distance by walking).

6.0 VG denied all other suggestion put up by defense lawyer.

PW-2, PW3 & PW4 ----- Declared hostile.

PW5 – Mother of VG

Examination in chief

1.0 I know Accused. My daughter and accused love each other from school days (from 12th standard).

2.0 Accused “without any reason raped my daughter” in that hotel.

3.0 Accused confessed me over phone that he did the same. I told accused to settle the matter by yourself and my daughter as this matter is between accused and my daughter.

Cross Exam

1.0 I did not told the above matter to Police.

Then Register of the Hotel is called. destruction of evidence has not been found. Also name of Accused and VG have not found in the register.

Now next phase witness examination will start tomorrow.

Please give opinion on the above regarding probability of conviction.

Above matter are explained as per true copy of evidence paper.

AdYVPatil   14 November 2014 at 10:32

Release deed

If release deed is executed without consideration by sisters, can it be challenged in court of law? If yes then on what ground?