Ashwin
04 October 2015 at 21:00
Dear Sir,
;nnbb:............. My...
rahul
04 October 2015 at 20:53
Respected Sir,
What is the difference between notice to production of documents under above two provisions ?
Thank you.
S. Fernandes
04 October 2015 at 20:47
Dear Sir,
Please advise if an order past in Goa, under O-39 Rule 1& 2 is compulsory required to be registeted.
Thankyou
Deepak Rane
04 October 2015 at 19:57
Dear Sir,
In the yr 2011 I have paid a builder Rs. 1 Lakhs, & in the year 2014 again I had paid a sum of Rs. 2 Lakhs - Total Payment is 3 Lakhs towards a flat purchase at Titwala, Thane Dist. In the year 2014 the builder asked us for govt registration, so I had done registration of the flat with a payment of stamp duty of 1.5 Lakhs. total expenses till date is 4.5 lakhs.
But now builder says he is unable to construct the building & will refund our amount. Since Jan 15 I had been following with him for payment , but till now I have not received any payment from him.
I need your guidance -- Shall I go in police or CBI & register a 420, cheating case against him? Pl help me to guide on the same.
Bhadraswamy Raghavan
04 October 2015 at 16:54
Respected Experts,
A money lender receives only a blank cheque (duly signed)with address proof(as collateral) of an unknown person from a known person (non-trust worthy) and gives huge money .
The known person (non-trust worthy) deceives money lender. The money lender goes to court of law but do not able to recover money.
Now the money lender identifies the "unknown person" and threatens to book a case surety cheque case.
Is it legally possible to sue a case in the Court of law against the "Unknown person"?without any legal documents attaching the unknown person.
Thanks for valuable advice.
Rajesh Dhopat
04 October 2015 at 16:50
Is law of limitation is applicable to the govt dues receivable from govt. staff in india
Rohit Ravlani
04 October 2015 at 16:39
I did signature as witness for an unknown person he was applying for re-entry for registration as pharmacist,he was removed out because of no renewal fee paid on time(name has been removed under section 34(2)of pharmacy act 1948).
i seriously had no idea who the person is and i shouldn't sign it.i signed as a witness,i dont know the person at all.
UPDATE : i also had to enter my name, address, registration number, my date of renewal, renewal slip number. i didn't
gave all my details
i signed, named, addressed and gave my registration number but I didn't gave my slip number and my renewal date .
will i be in trouble?? or will it considered valid cuz i havent gave them all my details ,the form was incomplete???
urgent,am seriously regretting it
AMITS
04 October 2015 at 16:18
RESPECTED EXPERTS, I HAVE A QUERY...! MY MOTHER HAS CLAIMED HER SHARE FROM HER BROTHERS IN ANCESTRAL PROPERTY (4 BOROTHERS 4 SISTERS)MY MOTHER IS 5 TH SISTER REST OF THE SISTERS HAVE RELINQUISHED THEIR RESPECTIVE SHARE IN FAVOUR OF 4 BROTHERS,INITIALLY WE CLAIMED FOR 1\9 SHARE BUT I HAVE BEEN TOLD THAT SINCE THE DEED OF RELINQUISHMENT OF RIGHTS BY THE SISTERS HAS BEEN MADE ONLY AFTER MY SUIT FOR (1/9 SHARE )CLAIM SO PROBABLY NOW I COULD CLAIM FOR 1/5 SHARE INSTED OF 1/9 SHARE, IS THERE ANY LAW REGARDING THIS OR ANY LANDMARK DECISION,KINDLY THROW SOME LIGHT OVER THIS.
REGARDS
Tripathi
04 October 2015 at 15:38
Dear Sirs,
My neighbor who is a retired Police Official made illegal construction DDA flat. We filed a Civil Suit and the same was put forward to Lok Adalat as settlement and the Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) to demolish the illegal construction. MCD has done only partial demolition of the illegal construction.
In the Lok Adalat, the retired police official has given a written statement that he will allow the demolition and will not indulge in any unlawful act which will invite contempt of court proceedings.
However, when the Civil proceedings were going on, using his influence as retired police officer, he has filed an FIR with the local police station under section 354 (c), 354 (d), 508 & 509 against my husband alleging harassment to his wife.
The FIR has been lodged around two months before the Lok Adalat Settlement. We came to know about the filing of the FIR only through our resident welfare association since he made another complaint of similar nature about my husband with the RWA. The association called for an explanation and we had shown all the court documents and proved that he his filing complaint since his illegal construction is getting demolished. The RWA refused to entertain his complaint.
The strategy of the retired police official is to pressurize us that we should accept the partial demolition - otherwise the FIR can be activated. The colony has ten security cameras and my husband is a law abiding citizen and never indulge in any illegal or criminal acts.
The police did not visit us till date (more than two months) but the FIR is still exists. When we checked informally with the Police, they claim that there is no evidence against my husband and hence they did not visit us at all. But the FIR is not closed yet.
Now the question is :
1. When the proceedings were going on in the Civil Court, is it necessary for the defendent (retired police official) to convey the lodging of the FIR against my husband (Plaintiff)? He was hiding this info.
2.Filing of such false FIR when the proceedings are going on in a Civil court,will it not amount to Contempt of Court?
3. Can I file a contempt of court proceedings with the Civil Court which delivered the judgement through Lok Adalat against him?
4. Since he has given a written statement that he will not indulge in any unlawful act, whether the filing of false FIR can be treated as unlawful act to prevent the full demolition process?
5. Can the contempt of court petition be filed with the same Civil Court that has delivered the judgement or it has be filed only at High Court?
6. Since no evidence is available with the police, how the FIR can be closed?
7. Can I file a Criminal defemation against the retired police official since he has filed a false FIR and also ask for suitable compensation for tarnishing the image of my husband?
Apologize for the inconvenience caused.
Mrs.Gupta
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Director attendance
1.We are not maintain our director attendance
it is mandatory
2.Director asking Loan from company any procedure in private ltd company
3.We have two director , one director having 90% share other director have 10% share
the 90 % director. we promote Managing director of 90% share holder.