JAIME
17 January 2016 at 16:03
Could any expert interpret what the following means:-
P.C.
Heard.
2. Issue notice to the respondents, with intimation that this matter is
likely to be disposed of finally at the admission stage.
3. The learned Public Prosecutor waives notice for all the
respondents.
4. Stand over to 12/02/2016 at 2.30 p.m.
Does this mean that the case is going to be decided against the Petitioner before admitting the case? what could be the remedy in such a case?
Thank You
jps
17 January 2016 at 15:15
A person is convicted for an offence under Dp act . six months later he is again convicted under same Dp act. However on deciding the quantum of sentence, his counsel argues that he has never been earlier convicted under similar Dp act and the judge doesn't put any capital or other punishment however let's him go after admonition. The io is present, who incidentally was also io in previous conviction. How to proceed with this contempt of cout and perjury. What more sections can be applied .
Ankit
17 January 2016 at 13:53
I have got a situation of my dearest friend who just got married 1 month back & had gone out of India (to country where he is working on contract & to countries nearby), for honeymoon, with his dear wife. It is an arranged marriage. Except bride & groom, all the family members stay back in India.
Girl has not been understanding & has rather been stubborn on her way of leading life instead of being responsible after getting married, which is expected by bride as well as groom, to start building relation.
There were disputes raised between the parents of my friend & his wife, due to rituals which needs to be followed after marriage on first festivals for 1 year after married life of the children, in which bride's parents have to gift 4 Pair of Clothes, sweets & sindoor. The same were already well informed by groom's parents to bride's elderly before the marriage & were also reminded after marriage.
These disputes led to the fact that girl came back from mid honeymoon period leaving the husband, and directly went back to her parents, which was considered by bride & his family, as an immature decision by the young girl.
But then, soon it was then identified that bride's father & mother had been unnecessarily alleging my friend's family on phone, for dowry and mental torture, which was shocking. It has been clear now that the prime motto of bride's family is to dominate groom & groom family or threaten financial implications by filing divorce FIR.
Now since things have gone even more worse & have proven to be eyeopener, I would like to get advice on how I can help my friend save his financial impact in case of divorce, which in current situation seems unavoidable.
(1) Which precautions should he take to safegaurd his property?
(2) Which Legal Rights can be in his favour if he lodges FIR before bride's family files the same?
(3) Can he transfer all his property to his own parents without any sale consideration?
(4) I have read about Sec 14 of Marriage Act, which denies divorce before 6 months?
(5) Which all claims can be made by wife after marriage of 1 month as right on property?
(6) Does it always have impact only on husband financially as well as mentally & there are no rights for husband getting / seeking divorced?
Kindly address these queries..
Annapurna Ramanathan
17 January 2016 at 13:37
I want to trace a court case with Supreme Court - case No. 'CER3(b) 30456/14 and get its judgement text.
I am unable to find this in the online system.
Can somebody help?
Thanks & Regards,
Annapurna R
GOURAV
17 January 2016 at 13:33
Dear Sir,
I am residing a street which is open only from one side. Some people of our street are agree to make a door in entrance, But Some people is not agree.
My Query is which people who are not agree to make door at entrance can file a case against who are agree. If yes in which section and how.
M.Anbu chezhian
17 January 2016 at 12:12
i am a op1 non appearance of parties that case was set exparty.can i setaside the case
Rishabh Kesarwani
17 January 2016 at 11:46
If there is a question to prove a company a legal entity. The basic aim is to provide the company with the right of freedom of speech and expression. I want some case laws which shows how company or legal right contains freedom of speech and expression. The laws can be of any country.
wishes sharma
17 January 2016 at 10:38
What is the difference between section 126 and section 135 of the electricity act 2003.
How can a person who is assessed under section 126 of the act prove his innocence and quash the fir which has been filed under section 135 and section 138 of the act.
Although during inspection some particles or objects were found in the meter appratus...
The petitioner is the MD of the company and he is accused with the same and a bill of Rs 56 lakhs is demand as fine by the assessing authority.
He has paid the fine u/s 126 of the act but do not want to pay the amount u/s 152 of the act as he was not aware of the same...
The court has taken cognizance and he wants to quash the same in the High Court.. please advice how to proceed..
Rafiq
17 January 2016 at 08:52
Respected Sir/Mam, what is the rule in SRA in case am having 2 shops on the same name. Am I eligible for 2 shops ? requesting you to share the rule or suggest the article number
Regards,
Rafiq
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
false rape case
My friend was imprisoned for 20 years under 376 D in a false gang rape case.how he escape himself.