LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

precioususer   08 February 2016 at 16:42

Ill legalstand mining

Hello,
I am from the village near Cauvery River, Government was already tendered particular area and they started getting soil in river bed it was finish in that survey no. But Our village panchayat president gave permission to government agency to stand mining near by government tendered area and said using my post i am giving permision. He is doing without knowledge of government . Having big soil bed which contain 20 ft, but they go in depth of 30 ft in that place. he is join hand with groups and government officers around the area doing this activity in stand mining. But he is eyewash people and saying getting fund for local .Is any possibilty to notice him under demage suit act or suggest what kind of notice we can send to take legal action against Panchayat president. Only village people will give notice or anyone in tamilnadu.
Thanks
Pts

pravin jadahav   08 February 2016 at 16:42

About 7/12

hello all dear experts,my que. is that,currently 7/12 document of my land shows
2.15 yakare land but the 40 yrs back documents of same land shows 2.30 yakare land & the difference in land is shifted to neighbours land illegaly,so what is process to regain my land from that landholder

thanking you

Gavendra Singh   08 February 2016 at 16:28

Family safety and divorce

I got arrange marriage in June 2015. In laws wants to marry sister in law in another caste. My family and other relatives is completely opposing this relation as the whole family will get disturb but my wife and in laws making pressure to join and ignore inter caste subject. Due to this we are also getting threat for false case and other wrong things. Kindly suggest how to save family members from false allegations and court case and get divorce.

Ashok kumar Sharma   08 February 2016 at 15:56

punishment for lekhpal ( patwari )

A has agriculture land in a interior area of u.p.state in bhumidhar category.all revenue record i.e.tehsil record explain itself that title of A is undisputed.In a accident A died and his widow sells the land in accordance with law.after 5 year a person who has similarity with personal detail of A, like name, fathers name,year of birth claim before D.M.& TEHSILDAR of the Area,that his land has been sold by widow of A.later it come to know the person who is claiming against widow of A, is projected by the concerned lekhpal (patwari)of the circle.and patwari were well aware about all the facts,that widow of A Cant defend herself against the complaint and any body will not help in this complaint so he harassed the widow of A.Tehsildar judicial make a enquiry and find fact in favour of widow of A, and rejected the claim of projected person by patwari. suggest maximum legal action.

skms   08 February 2016 at 14:57

Doubts on caveat

Dear Experts,

I have posted the question in forum but didn't get any replies, I request your help on it

One of our tenants, (whos agenda is to claim adverse possession though no suite have yet started) , filed a caveat for do not obstruct the wide road they are using around 10 feet, which is through our land , which is through center and it divide our land in front to two part. we are agreed to give a 4 feet (I belive 3 feet is the legal right) through side to the house he stays which will give us a one single piece of land in front. entire property is ours , and we are also paying land taxes, building tax (for the house he stays) , the defensive stand instead of filing a suite is to sell a part of property,before starting a legal war.
My understanding that he filed a caveat instead of a suite as he didn't have any legal right on the property, but if we file a suite against him, I believe he will immediately claim an adverse possession, which may take years to settle and until its settled he can enjoy the property as he stays there. I also believe all these caveat filing is for proving his 'Hostile' stands in the court while claim adverse possession.
From my understanding caveat is not a court order, its just a notice. against any legal action , please correct me If I am wrong. My questions are,

What happen if we forcefully close that road and make it 4 feet through side. as we provide passage , we didn't obstruct his easement right, as its not a court order I belive there is nothing wrong in doing so. If he destroy that closing wall , can we give a police complaint, while caveat exists.

Can we register that peice of land in another document while caveat exists, we plan to create another document including house he stays in another family member name, with road described in the document. so I believe the even if its become a suite in future, he can only claim the road in the document which include the house he stays. also it protect our risk to that document while saving the rest of the property. is there any legal restriction on registering a document while caveat exists?

Also he will take income from our trees like , coconut, without our permission. Can we move to file a police complaint/criminal suite for Theft on him?

Looking forward for some lights on these issues. Thank you for your valuable suggestions.

Atul Joshi   08 February 2016 at 14:47

Clarification about section 29 of mcs act

Hi,
I am planning to purchase a resale flat in Mumbai. The original owner died in 2015 and the flat was transferred to her heirs in sept 2015.
I am buying it from the heirs. However as per section 29 they cannot sell it for one year and hence my name will not be added to the share certificate till sept 2016. Is there any exception to this law since the original name change was by transmission and no sale was involved. I would really appreciate some clarity on this. Thanks

Amit R Agrawal   08 February 2016 at 14:39

Affidavit evidence

Whether additional evidence by way of affidavit evidence can be given in civil suits.??

O.N.Singh   08 February 2016 at 12:44

Pay and seniority

Dear Sir
please find details
Anomalies in pay scales
1.2.20 Insofar as anomalies relating to the pay scales are concerned, a large number of these anomalies would be automatically settled by introduction of the proposed scheme of running pay bands. . . . . . .
2.2.11. . ..... Grade pay will determine the status of a post with (apart from the two apex scales of Secretary/equivalent and Cabinet Secretary/equivalent that do not carry any grade pay) a senior post being given higher grade pay. Grade pay being progressively higher for successive higher posts,
2.2.11 . …….. In the revised scheme, the date of annual increments, in all cases, will be the first of July. Employees completing six months and above in the scale as on July 1st will be eligible. This is being recommended to alleviate a large number of anomalies that arise due to the present system of annual increments where the increments are given on the basis of the month of joining a particular post and which frequently leads to a senior drawing lesser salary than his/her junior.
2.2.13 ………..
(vi) Seniority of a post will depend on the grade pay drawn. This will invariably be more for a higher level post. Pay scales will largely become irrelevant for purposes of computing seniority. Thus, the present situation where frequently a junior draws higher salary (albeit in lower pay scale) vis-à-vis his senior because of longer years of service, will no longer be of any essence for purposes of computing seniority.
In view of above I would like to know whether

1)Employee promoted on 1/9/2006 in GP 5400/- receiving less pay than his junior of same cadre in GP 4600/-

2) An employee promoted to GP of Rs.6600/- on 1/9/2012 receiving less pay than his junior in GP Rs.5400/- in the same cadre and
3)An employee promoted to grade pay of 6600 on 1/9/2012 is getting less pay than his counter part promoted to the same post on 1/9/2015

will constitute anomaly or not?

ashis talukder   08 February 2016 at 12:19

Income tax-income from other sources-flat purchased

"A" - a salaried person having net Taxable Income Rs.4,25,000/- p.a. purchased a flat in Kolkata for Rs.12,00,000/- (original transaction value) on April 2015, but stamp duty was paid on Govt.Value of Rs.20,00,000/- at d time of Registration (i.e. April 2015), agreement was made before 3 yrs. Would u plz guide is there is any Tax liability?How much?What will b d procedure?Is d new sec 56(2)(vii)-INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES is applicable? Thnx. Regds.Ashis.

sagar   08 February 2016 at 12:14

BLDNG CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT TP

I just wanto know about issue durring the period of building transfer from gram panchayat to corporation under were building wasn't have TP Sactioned so please suggest me asap.