Advocate Anis Ahmad 9456860195
21 November 2016 at 12:38
Is there any supreme court and high courts ruling if a Magistrate do not entertain bail Application on same day
Advocate Anis Ahmad 9456860195
21 November 2016 at 12:36
Can police do NCR under sec 323,504,506 IPC with 151 CrPC challan
Madansingh Shekhaawat
21 November 2016 at 12:28
We are four brothers and two sisters (only heirs). Both sisters are married, one in 1970 and other in 1983. Our father has expired in 1985 and mother in 1993 (both intestate) leaving an independent building in Thane (his self acquired) in which two tenants and we four brothers are staying. After father's death, our mother's name was added in property card. After mother's demise, our four brother’s names were put on property card. Since then we brothers are looking and maintaining the property without input from sisters. In addition, until now, our four brother’s names are continuing on property card and sisters never demanded their names in property card. However, looking at the current property prices boom, in Jan 2016 our sisters, without informing us, have applied with city survey office to cancel our names/entries from property card and sought inclusion of their names in property card with our names.
Do sisters have their right to ask share in our father’s property?
If yes, and if they are stubborn on their demand, can we demand their equal share of charges that we have spent on protecting and maintaining the property until now and in future if required?
Suresh Kumar
21 November 2016 at 12:21
Sir
I have following queries:
1) Is there any difference between 'Technical Resignation' and'Resignation'?
2) Is there any notice of period for technical resignation if an employee already has taken N.O. C. for applying a post in other department?
Anonymous
21 November 2016 at 11:58
Aslamlekum sir mera nam sk ,shaheda mera shadhi hindu ladaka se huvva ta shadhi muslim law me huvva tho mere bhacho ko (BC.E) kyesa badaltha sir mera husbend (OC)
Krishna
21 November 2016 at 09:19
In the year 1975 my grandfather executed registered WILL of his self acquired properties bequeathing 1/3 rd share to his elder son, 1/3rd share to his younger son and remaining 1/3rd share to his legally wedded second wife (after death of 1st wife) without any description of the properties with metes and bounds and moreover 2nd wife (beneficiary of the WILL) being an attestor in that WILL.
Here my doubt is can i challenge the WILL by taking plea that beneficiary of the WILL being an attestor raising doubt that WILL executed by testator by coercion and fraud?
There was no description of properties with metes and bounds but whereas after death of testator his 2nd wife alienated some properties as her own wish by specifically mentioning that the said properties is an intestate succession, can this point favour me?
Finally can this WILL be void under law?
ranveer
21 November 2016 at 09:04
I sell my property to a person he paid token amount and with a legal agreement and mention time to pay remaining of money ,,,,i invested that token amount somewhere and make another agreement..
But the first party says to break agreement and asking for refund of the total amount he gave as token,,,,what should i do now legally,,,, please help. How much should i refund as the second party also refuse to give me back the token amount.
Riya
20 November 2016 at 22:38
Got married in 2013 and within marriage was called out...The person cheated and gone to UK he was UK citizen. I have a divorce case from 2014 the person is absconded I am facing problem to get divorce.how can I get divorced in this situation.please help
Sheraz I. Malik
20 November 2016 at 21:55
should there be injury as well as damage in every tort?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Query regarding dv act
Hon'ble Experts
I am facing case of DV Act in the case interim maintenance was rejected by court through below mention order
11.11.2015
Present : Complainant is absent.
Respondent along with counsel
On the last date, a last opportunity was granted to the complainant to file her income affidavit. Despite the directions the same is not filed. Several opportunities have already been granted for the said purpose, it appears that complainant does not require any interim relief, therefore, opportunity for filing the income affidavit is closed. List for PE. The complainant is directed to file evidence by way of affidavit with advance copy to the opposite side before the next date of hearing.
List for appearance of complainant /tendering and cross examination /PE 01.012.2015
But now on 18 nov 2016
She has filed her income affidavit.
My lawyer said that
it is for maintenance on final judgement.
but she will not able to get any maintenance at final if she will not able to prove domestic violence. IS IT CORRECT?
AND my second question is can she file income affidavit after opportunity is closed as mentioned in above order
Thanks and Regards