Sandeep kumar
18 February 2017 at 20:25
the writer wrote a sell agreement and at the end first took the thumb impressions of the parties and later wrote farik avval which slightly came over the thumb impression of the farik avval. court considered that the thumb impressions were taken on blank paper and later written on it. there are two attestators of the document and the writer himself. can it be rebuted?
D.Dakshina Moorthy
18 February 2017 at 20:24
Dear Sirs,
Kindly provide your valuable suggestion for the same.
One Lady got a Building and she gave General Power Authority to her Elder Son in his name.
Later she sold the building for Rs.80,000 to Another person with witness her son. On the same day she made another Reconveyance agreement for the period of 5 years. Earlier Sale Deed agreement was not cancelled. After making these agreements, she and her family lived in the same building as Lessee. Nine months, later she and her son gave an amount of Rs.40,000/- for the principle amount. The Lessor/present building owner considered this amount as Rent for the building. Hence, there was a Dispute between. After some times, the Lady and her son dead. Meanwhile, The reconveyance agreement did not take into consideration. Hence, the legal heirs of the Late Lady and her son,s legal heir made a Redemption mortgage for the recovery of the building within the period of five years. On the basis of Sale Deed agreement , the Building owner sold the building to another person. Later he dead. The Past Building Legal heirs claiming to the Present owner of the building. The dispute was continued. Finally, the Court is given Degree in favour of the Present Building owner.
Not taken into consideration of the Rs.40.000 as the principle amount, and not taking into consideration of the Reconveyance agreement, only on the basis of Sale Deed Agreement, the building was sold, and the seller also dead. On the basis of the sale deed agreement, the present building owner went to the against Past Legal heirs of the building and won in the High Court of Bangalore. As per the court order, the Past Legal heirs have to vacate their position.
If the situation is being this, what is remedy for the Past Legal heirs and what step they to take further ? Some of the the Late Lady and Late Son’s legal heirs did not sign in any document. What are the remedies will be available to them. Is there any chance to recovery for the building by the way of submitting Revision/Review Petition for the same.
Meanwhile, the present building owner made caveat application.
I request you to kindly provide your guidance for the same.
Thanking you,
( D.Dakshina Murthy).
krishna
18 February 2017 at 19:49
I am working as gramin dak sevak (3 hrs duty) can study post graduation (regular)
Is it legal or not
M Singh
18 February 2017 at 19:07
Besides filing case in labour court for reinstate I also filed case for recovery of damages done to me during the course of service. My query is that compensation for an illegal, irregular or excessive distress period of limitation is one year. Although after dismissal I filed the case within 2 months and defendants have taken objection that he faced distress during the year 2013 and 2014 whereas the distress continued from 2013 till 2016. Can distress be taken from 2013 to 2016 as continuity for cause of action.
Anonymous
18 February 2017 at 17:50
Hi, In case the bride's mother's father and the groom's mother's father is blood brothers. Do they fall under SAPINDA restrictions.
Member (Account Deleted)
18 February 2017 at 17:41
What is the procedure for PF if salary increased due to revision
paid after retirement. Can employer directly pay employer contribution to resigned and retired employees
jaisaad
18 February 2017 at 17:23
MY DEFENCE WAS STRIKE OFF AND I WAS NOT GIVEN NOTICE ABOUT IT AS I AM WORKING ABROAD DESPITE I HAD HIRE LAWYER FOR ME.PART INTERIM ORDER WAS OBEYED LATER ON STOPED. MY CASE WILL NOT PROCEED DUE TO THIS DEENCE STIKE OFF AS PER OPPONENT ADVOCATE.EVEN MY ADVOCATE PUT ANOTHER CASE OF PURJURY THAT ALSO NOT BEEN HEARED.CONFUSED THIS IS EXTORTION OF MONEY LEGALY IN HMA SEC24 WHAT CAN I DO NOW.
Alok Chhabra
18 February 2017 at 16:20
Hello Sir, my wife expired in july 2015 in a road accident with motor cycle, accused was minor( juvenile), he flied away from the spot,bike number provided me by public on the spot, we lodged a fir against him under section 279 and 304 A IPC, two eye witness were there at the time of accident and CCTV cameras were installed also there, but camera does not show the actual photo of the accused but it is showing the hitting scene from back side, CD is reported in case file by police, but one of eyewitness does not come to court for evidence and another hostiles, so court acquitted him last month( jan 2017), what should I do, it is state versus accused and what the time for reappeal? can i appeal it individually, We have filed also a MACP case against him and insurance company and all evidence from petitioner's side has been completed, can accused take an advantage in MACP case because he has been acquitted from criminal court. plz advise. Regards
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Undue delays in summery suit and then in execution of decree
I filed a summery suit vide 34/2010 on 2/2/201i0 for recovery of unpaid salary by GSHL.Decreed on 11/11/2013.Filed Spl Dharkhast vide 28/2014 in feb 2014.All at thane district court.
Spent over 10 lakhs in last 8 years to recover my unpaid salary since 2008.Amounting to 150000 USD.Work place was Nigeria.
Case appears to be managed by judgement debtor.Court proceedings are heavily weighed in favour of Promod mittal/Vinod mittal of Ispat Group.
Due to delay at trial stage the Mittals were allowed to sell Ispat ind to JSW in Feb 2012 and sell all their holdings in JSWISPAT/JSW in Nov 2013.Award came in my favour by end of Nov 2013.Execution nproceedings are a;;oed to be draged on each week almost.
I feel I made a mistake going to court.They are bleeding me.
I am now 70.Have lost faith in Courts who only serve rich and mighty.Judges/judiciary has no conscience.
PL help