P RaviShankar-cell-8939332195
10 November 2017 at 14:57
I filed 156(3) crpc petition and magistrate ordered police investigation. But police conspired and came to court and said complaint papers missing from police station. Magistrate told me to file private complaint and dismissed my private complaint. Can I ask for reinvestigation by any other police agency.
Anonymous
10 November 2017 at 14:56
Property: Residential Flat
Ownership: Jointly owner by son and mother.
Mother expired intestate a couple of years back leaving behind 3 sons, including the joint owner and 1 daughter (assuming all are alive) as her legal heirs.
The 2 brothers and sister have signed a joint affidavit in favour of brother (joint owner) stating that they have no right, title and interest in the flat. The affidavit is made on stamp paper of RS.500/- and is duly notarized (registered notary with serial number).
My question is;
1. Can the affidavit be considered sufficient legal document to transfer 100% rights in the flat in the name the joint owner?
2. If not, what is required to be done from the society point of view to make sure the transfer, if done, is not challenged in the future.
B.S.NARAHARI
10 November 2017 at 12:32
Namasthae Sirs,
Iam an Govt employed and presently working as an technician on Diploma Education basis. Now without quiting my current job i want to elevate to higher posts by updating myself with higher qualifications. In this regard the AMIE courses equivalent to B.E ( Engineering graduate ) offered by Institution of Engineers ( India ) Kolkatta is the best option owing to flexibility in timings and no donations. Before my enrolment the AMIE was recognized by MHRD( Government ) and presently for those students enrolled prior May 2013 was recognized by AICTE ( Government ).
Recently Supreme court quashed the recognition of all technical courses in distance education mode. This surely affects the Passed and presently studing AMIE and AMIETE students. Not only the present students but also for new aspirants living in remote villages where daily access to Diploma or Engineering colleges is not possible. Considering all these cases, Can we appeal and request the Supreme court for justification or else supreme court judgement will be the final. Please advice us
Regards
Narahari
Mith Pune MH
10 November 2017 at 12:19
I live in Pune. Agreements for all the flats in our society was done in 2015-2016. Builder has sold parking spaces to 16 members. 4 members are without any parking space. I have below questions:
1. As per the articles I have read on internet, builders were not supposed to sell parking spaces at the time we had our registrations done (I am not sure whether the members who have purchased the parking from the builder have anything mentioned in the agreement regarding this.). So are the allotments done by the builder void?
2. The society now claims that there is not enough space in the premises to give any parking to the remaining 4 members. However, some members who have purchased the parking have empty spaces with them. The society has laid down the rule that members who do not have parking space will have to park their vehicles in the parking space of the owners and pay them rent. Is this legal? Can the society lay down any such rule?
3. How can I challenge the right to park the vehicle in the society premises?
PUSHPENDRA S
10 November 2017 at 12:19
One of our employee joined service in 2004 on the basis of ITI qualification. Later on in 2011 he requested to add his B Sc degree into his service records which he had obtained in 1999. The same was added by Office Head of the office of his posting at that time. Now he has applied for Limilted Dept competitive Exam requiring Graduation degree.
Was addition of Higher edu in service records at later stage by Office Head in order? Though him being holding Graduation at the time of his entry into Govt service wouldn�t have disqualified him from applying for the post which he joined. Pls reply with rule position.
Regards.
Yadagiri. K
10 November 2017 at 12:19
Is there any validity period to cancelation of a property deed, suppose someone purchased a property illegally, after few years originall property holder came to know about this issue, so is there any validity period to cancel the sale deed..
Balaji Bakthavathsal
10 November 2017 at 12:18
An old lady made an illegal gift settlement of a property to her son to which she is not the absolute owner. The old lady’s daughter who was jealous of the gift settlement, filed a false suit in the lower court challenging the gift settlement and seeking partition of the property stating that it is her ancestors property. Actually the persons are total strangers and no way related to the family or the property. The suit filed in the lower court did not include the genuine legal heirs who are in possession and occupation of the suit property. When the genuine legal heirs came to know about the false litigation, they immediately impleaded themselves in the suit and the suit was dragged for seven long years. Except the genuine legal heirs, all other respondents have been declared ex-parte and now the suit has come to trail stage. The plaintiff has been cross examined and it has come to notice beyond any doubt that the plaintiff is lying and the suit is a false and frivolous one. The witness brought by the plaintiff who is yet to cross examined but blabbered in his statement contradicting the statement of the plaintiff. It is pertinent to state that the genuine legal heirs already filed a suit on the very same property and got a permanent injunction against the plaintiff and others. The question is, at this point
1) Can the impleaded respondents, being the genuine legal heirs to the property who are in possession and occupation, plead the judge to stop further proceeding and deliver the judgment ending further process ? If yes, I request you to provide appropriate citation of similar case.
2) Can we seek a direction from the judge restricting the plaintiff for further appeal to next appellate court by the plaintiff, this being a bogus and false litigation? If yes, I request you to provide appropriate citation of similar case.
Thanking you,
B.Balaji
Ajay Bansal
10 November 2017 at 12:09
One of my client has sent messages from Chandigarh to Agra to some persons at face-book, saying a woman as prostitute and her husband(Complainant) as her tout. FIR u/s 67 IT Act has been registered at Rohatak. Complainant is alleging that he got information of said message at Rohatak. Police has served a notice u/s 41A to the client. What is the legal position regarding jurisdiction ? Please also tell whether section 67 IT Act attracts in this matter.
Parama Das
10 November 2017 at 11:45
I worked in Allahabad bank since 2011 as clerk. Recently I decided to resign the job on a ground of my child's ill health and also the rude behaviour I faced from branch manager. I already submitted my resignation and dont want to serve the notice period . I am ready to pay even a months salary. Can the bank take any legal actions on me. Alao i have no plan of joining any service in future
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Qualifying service & pension calculation effect - regarding
Sir/Madam
Suppose a Central Government Servant has entry in his Service Book as "EOL from 10.10.2016 to 20.10.2106 (10 days) granted (this period not to be counted for pension). What does it mean, assuming suppose Date of joining is 16th June, 1989 and date of superannuation is 31st March, 2026?
Whether eligibility for pension itself is affected?