Anonymous
04 February 2018 at 11:15
dear sir,
My query regarding TRNS2.ITC
That we have filled TRANS1 with closing stock about 200 mt (5 items-HSN/goods) within the due date,
“As the rule prescribe to ensure that all the HSN/goods are declared in TRAN 2, in the opening balance in the month of July, 2017, irrespective of the fact that these have been sold or not in the first i.e. July, 2017 tax period.”
By mistake at the time of filling TRNS2 for july17 out of five items HSN/goods (200mt) only one item 50 mt HSN/goods that was sold during the month of july was taken as opening bal and rest four items HSN/goods was not shown in op bal in the month of july, which was sold during the period july17 to Dec17
So please suggest the way how claiming ITC on the remaining 4 items HSN/goods that was also sold during july to dec.
M Rajendra
04 February 2018 at 09:23
Hi
I want to discuss a case with you.
In my case "A" and "B" are husband and wife resp. They are having 1 Son "C" and 2 daughters "D" & "E"
"C" is married and his wife "F" having some property which "A" has purchased 4 acre land in 1990 on name of "F"
"A" died in 1994 and "B" died in 2007. There was one civil suit running on purchased land since 1994. This suit was against "F" filled by other party say "X". In this suite "F" had given written statement having a line "A" bought this property in name of "F". After long duration this suite Suit was settled in court in 2017.
Now "D" and "E" filed a suit against "F" saying that they are having shares in land purchased by "A" in name of "F"
Sale deed of 1990 was made in name of "F" only. This purchase is very well known to "D" & "E".
Now I just want to know that will "D" & "E" are eligible to get shares in purchased property i.e. 4 acre land?
MahendraKumar.H.Trivedi
04 February 2018 at 09:19
Sir,
Repeated query with changed thread as at defense stage, lawyer not filing reply, other lawyers not accepting case, lawyer not taking fees nor resigning but keeps sending case status by soft ware. I am really confused and each day passes in tension, although my case is easily defendable due to time limit.
However on next date I am going to court station on three days earlier and try and file my defense reply my self.( time barred argument )
Meanwhile please opine :suit is for title of plot by virtue of sale transfer agreement but suit plot already sold before case came on board. There was injunction on plot and sold in 2009, contempt application filed in the same suit in 2015. Contempt time barred but what could be implications on main complaint on title. Possession was with plaintiffs and I am defendant. Plaintiffs hid third party possession to court to whom plot is already sold and title transferred much much before case came on board. ( IN 2009)
Regards
Athi Vishal HD
04 February 2018 at 08:39
Respected Sir/Madam, I am Prashanth from Karnataka. My Grand-father has 5 Childrens, out of them 1 is female (My Aunt) whose DOB is 06-06-1953. After my father(in 1983), Grand-Mother (1999) and Grand-Father's(2007)death, we approached the Civil Court for partition of properties which held in the name of Grand-Mother (Purchased by her) and Grand-Father (both purchased and inheritance) and settled the matter in the Court by the way of Compromise in 2012. While compromising My Aunt is stating before the Hon'ble Judge and also in writing that "I have no rights in the properties and also I don't want any properties, so I accepted the partition". She also signed the Compromising Order issued by the court. After that we enjoying the properties. But now suddenly MY Aunt and her Childrens are demanding the 1/5 share in all the properties. 1.Is she entitled for 1/5 share? Please suggest me.
sriram
04 February 2018 at 08:11
I want to file criminal contempt under sec.2(c) of the contempt of courts Act 1971 against Tahasildar an R.D.O.
The matter in brief is,I got direction from A.P.IC,Hyderabad in land dispute matter and they are not implementing.I filed W.P.(c) along with civil Contempt in Supremecourt and which is pending in the Supremecourt due to the defective code8888.In the meanwhile,I was communicated the Tahasildar to implementthe order of the A.P.I.C and besides the matter is pending in the Hon'ble Supremecourt for Justice.with a view to made correspondence to save the most valuable time of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and be pleased to implement the order of the A.P.I.C.
i HAVE RECEIVED AN eNDORSEMENT FROM THE tAHASILDAR IS TO GET CERTIFIED COPY OF THE sUPREMECOURT'S jUDGEMENT to take further action.
The statement similar to the the lowering the authourity of the HON'BLE A.P.I.C and in my opinion,it leads to Criminal Contempt under the provision of sec.2(c) of contempt of courts Act.
My query regards whether is it applicable or not?
Anonymous
04 February 2018 at 07:38
Is renewal of agreement to be mandatory done on stamp paper? If we do it on company letter head, whether it is enforceable in court at the time of dispute?
vijay
04 February 2018 at 06:36
can a widow remarriage has share in first husband property?
since that lady has no child with 1st husband.
she remarried and pregnant now.
Anonymous
04 February 2018 at 02:59
Hi,
My wife has put a false allegation on me about determining a sex of the baby during our 125 CRPC / DV / 498 A case. She was about 13 weeks pregnant as per the date she mentioned.
I searched out on google and there is no accurate way to identify the sex of the baby until that time of pregnancy with a simple ultrasound.
Please help me with supported findings and how I can fight these cheap false allegations.
Regards,
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Cost of bearing internal leakage in flat
There is internal leakage from my flat and water is flowing down to below flat.
It has been alleged by Society that due to below provision in Bye Law, the cost of internal leakage has to be borne by me only. The relevant Bye Law is reproduced as under -
b. All the repairs, not covered by the byelaw No. 158(a) shall be carried out
by the Members at their cost. The expenditure of the internal leakage due to
toilet, sink etc. should be borne by concerned flat holders, with intimation to
the Society.
In my view the above clause suggest that cost should be borne by "Concerned Flat holders". This means it should be shared between the flat from where leakage is occurring and flat who are impacted by leakage. Since the words used viz., Member(s), Flat holders(s) suggest more than one.
Is my interpretation correct.
Is cost has to be borne by me only or has to be shared as per above interpretation.
Regards.