V.V.RAMDAS
05 November 2009 at 22:52
Dear friends,
Codified Hindu Law lays down that its provisions do not apply to the memmbers of the Scheduled tribes comming with the meaning of clause (25) of Aricle 366 of the Constitution . Therefore under which law the tribals are guided ? Please do provide recent supreme court rulings on both (for & aginst)the sides.
V.V.RAMDAS
05 November 2009 at 22:50
Dear friends,
Codified Hindu Law lays down that its provisions do not apply to the memmbers of the Scheduled tribes comming with the meaning of clause (25) of Aricle 366 of the Constitution . Therefore under which law the tribals are guided ? Please do provide recent supreme court rulings on both (for & aginst)the sides.
chandra shakher joshi
05 November 2009 at 22:43
एक जनरल पॉवर १९९७ मैं लिखी गई , ब हमें पता चला है की पॉवर देने वाले तीन मैं से एक इंडिया से बहार रहेता है शायद पॉवर देते वक़्त वो इंडिया मैं नहीं था उसकी जगह किसी दुसरे को पेश कर पॉवर ली गई अब हम किस प्रकार पता कर सकते हैं की वह उस समय इंडिया में था या अब्रोअद था ?
दूसरा प्रश्न यह है की पॉवर देने वाले की दो बहनों ने पॉवर नहीं दी यह प्रोपर्टी एन्सस्त्रल नहीं है , तो क्या पॉवर को वोइड घोषित कराया जा सकता है ? पॉवर लेने वाले ने पॉवर के आधार पर जब अपील की तो दोनों बहनों के हमारे साथ रेस्पोंदेंत बना दिया !
(सी एस जोशी)
chandra55602@gmail.com
chandra shakher joshi
05 November 2009 at 22:31
After death of a person his wife and two sons give power of attorney in a property case to one in 1997. Now we came to know that one of the son is living abroad and it might be possible that at the time of power he was not in India. Another person was produced on his name and power was executed.
Now the question is - How can I get the record of the person that whether he was abroad or he was in India ?
Second question is - Two daughters are also alive, who did't give the power and in the second appeal in High Court the sisters were placed in the place of respondents, with me, by the power holder. Can the power be declared illegal? The property in question is not ancestral.
(C.S.Joshi)
chandra55602@gmail.com
pkpworld..
05 November 2009 at 21:47
Shopkeepter(owner of aHero Honda Show room)received a cash deposit of Rs.30000/- for advance o
madhan raj
05 November 2009 at 21:28
1 )My great grand father died in 1950. my grand father died in 1992 he was only son of My great grand father. My father was born in 1943 and he died in 2003 he was only son of My grand father. my father have three sister all married before 1970. I have one younger brother and my mother.
my grand father died in 1992 I came know 2005 act does not apply. Because he died prior to 2005 act.
2) my father being born prior to 1956 act he was only son of my grand father and my grand father was only son of My great grand father. I came to know that there is only son law by which my father get half of my grand father share another half divided among all his heirs. I want only son law citation which can help me.
Please help me.
Anonymous
05 November 2009 at 20:04
hello experts which is the right book to get info about CVC & CBI is their any act or rule 4 these org. if yes pl suggest. sorry 4 typing error insist of CBI i wrote abi
charudureja
05 November 2009 at 19:48
A wife has alleged that the items of dowry were kept by her husband n inlaws. she wants to implicate him for criminal breach of trust u/s 405 ipc. is it tenable. will he be liable u/s 405 or some other section.
charudureja
05 November 2009 at 19:45
TI parade was not held because accused were shown to Pw. will it said that identity of accused was not established.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
penalty u/s 271(1)(c)
One person filed return which was selected for scrutiny. The case was audited u/s 44AB. The ITO has passed order and demanded 78000/-. The demand raised was for the following reasons : The person has claimed excess depreciation. He had claimed depreciation @ 20% on W.d.v. of block assest instead of 15%. The assessesing officer had disallwoed excess depreciation and accordingly issued demand notice. He also imposed penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Rs.52000/- for concealment of income and wrong particular of total income.
My query is that :
AS the case was audited by the C.A., the C.A. Should penalised for such mistake. Is there any provision of any penalty for mistake of any CA. The C.A. is a reputed and registered C.A.. Also the assessee was not aware about the various allowable percentage of depreciation, so he had taken help of such CA who also filled the reutrn of income and helped to assesse for filing of return. My point is that Why should the assessee penalised for mistake of an C.A.
Whether the imposition of penalty by the officer is correct or not.
Whether the assessee had concealed the icnome and liable for penalty.
Whether any fruitful result will be comeout if appeal filed against the order of officer?