Sam D'costa
08 December 2009 at 12:29
We hold 419.25 sq.mtrs. land as an occupant. Hold this land before 1971 and started paying NA tax from 1981 as an occupant. The owner did not come to us any time. Our family is financially average. Im only educated and still studying. What to do i dont know. If anyone can suggest me. The land is in orange zone. NA receipt states my grandmother name as occupant aswell as owners name. Plz guide me...
Anonymous
08 December 2009 at 11:01
Dear Sir/s
Pls. let me know the procedure to obtain Letter of Administrative from Mumbai. and person who can help me in geting the same.
I thank you all in advance.
Bharat Gala
08 December 2009 at 10:59
Dear Sir/s
Pls. let me know the procedure to obtain Letter of Administrative from Mumbai. and person who can help me in geting the same.
Deepa
08 December 2009 at 10:54
A court decree was obtained 82 years back in connection with our ancestral property in Kerala. Names of around 30 family members were mentioned in that decree and most of them are no more now, and the property is now in possession of 10 members of the legal heirs of the family members, whose names are mentioned in the decree. Land tax is paid in the name of those who are in the possession of the property for the past 50 years at the least. Some of the minor girls whose names are mentioned in the decree are married off 70 years back and many of them are no more. Can the legal heirs of such ladies have a legally valid claim on our ancestral property? We are Malayali Brahmins and is there any court decision whereby it is decided that Women married off before 1974 do not have rights/claims in connection with their ancestral properties? Can the property be partitioned among those who are in the possession of the properties? Please provide the guidance needed.
Member (Account Deleted)
08 December 2009 at 10:49
SIR/MADAM I WANT TO KNOW THAT IN ACCIDENT CASE WHETHER BIKE (INSURED WITH A INSURANCE COMPANY)HAS STRUCK A PERSON AND HE INJURED THIS ACCIDENT. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT HE CLAIM AGAINST THAT INSURANCE COMPANY.
Deepa
08 December 2009 at 10:30
A Court decree was obtained 82 years back in connection with my ancestorial property in Kerala,in whch parties are named.Most of the parties are no more now,and many are ladies married 60 to 70 years back.Will the legal heirs of these married ladies will have a right on these ancestorial properties? These properties are in our possession for the past 70 years and land taxes were also paid in our name.We are Malayali brahmins and if a parttion is made now among those who have the possession of the property,will it valid?Is there a court decision by which women married before 1974 are not entitled to have rights in their ancestorial properties?
Anonymous
08 December 2009 at 06:17
a person made an agreement of sale/ irrevocable gpa (with possession) after paying the market value of the property.According to the law it is not a sale deed.
He somehow got his name along with address enclosed in the encumberance certificate. One close look at the EC reveals he as the owner. is it a legally allowed or is it a ploy by him to cheat the prospective buyers.
moreover at the site he has put his name as owner. is it legally correct.
a.manoharan
08 December 2009 at 05:24
Dear friends,
What is Charge Decree for the wife's maintenance over the property of husband . I want a leading Supreme Court Judgement or high courts.
Thanks in advance
Anonymous
08 December 2009 at 01:32
Respected experts,
One of my neighbor while constructing encroached around 400sqft of my land in 1997. We approached the Police but they failed to stop him. So, we prayed for Cr.P.C. 144 at the Hon’ble SDM court, and it invoked. But they didn’t obey the order and continued with the construction. We approached Police again, but police again failed to stop them and only given report u/s 188 Cr.P.C. that opposite party has done construction during the period of section 144 of Cr.P.C. and asked us to file a criminal case. Since my retired father was here that time, he failed/unable to take this pain (he has a fear of court and also prefer losing land than to go to the court). Section 144 Of Cr.P.C. got converted into Section 145 of Cr.P.C and we prayed for the ejection of the encroachment. Suddenly a new development took place which is that the same neighbor lost his entire land in a money suit at Hon’ble Patna High Court to a third party in 1998(case was going on since 1974 between them, where the neighbor had lost everywhere), but the neighbor appealed to Hon’ble Supreme Court. In view of this development our lawyer suggested us to wait for the final judgment between them. His plea was that, if this neighbor loses there also, then he will be out of the scene and our problem will solved and if he wins then we will reopen/restore this case later. We attended till 1999 and after that we stopped putting attendance. The opposite party too stopped attending. So, in 2003 the Hon’ble Magistrate closed the case by writing remark that since no body is taking interest since a long period. Now the neighbor case is undecided and going on, also he creating a lot of nuisance. Now the local lawyers are saying that to file a civil suit for title and recovery of possession otherwise the neighbor will get the advantage of adverse law of possession. Now what should I do? Will the limitation comes in a way for fresh civil (Title) suit or shall we file application to restore the old case? What is the use rather significance of the report u/s 188 Cr.P.C which is in my favor? Also shall I wait for the judgement (between them) of Hon'ble Supreme Court, since if the erring neighbor loses there, my problem will be solved. Pls. advice. Thanks to all.
Regarding the reply I want to say that,
In a plot I have got 0.25 acre and my neighbor owns 0.08 acres. The suit which is pending before hon’ble supreme is not between us, it is between erring neighbor and a third party on different matter (specific performance of contract) since 1974 for the entire land of 0.08. If my neighbor loses there means third party will become my new neighbor, who is not litigant. Other thing is that Patna High Court has not made any order regarding my land or my problem. How come I become party at Supreme Court?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Forced resignation by Employer
Dear All,
Since the last 5 months all my superiors are trying to demotivate me... not giving any work to me... I am Regional Commercial Manager and just a victim of Corporate Politics. An Assistant RCM is already been appointed three months back. I am just coming to office calmly and put my attendance and sit without any work till the end of office hours. No outstation or Local meetings are allowed to me. My other than salary re-imbursements are stopped. Day by day all the hindrances in my way to work are established.
Now they have not paid my salary for the m/o November 2009 for which all other employees get credit in their Bank account on 3rd December.
I asked many times for the reasons of such behavior of the management towards me from GM – Finanace and even CEO & Vise President of the company. But I never received a favorable reply and always asked to leave the company immediately. I seek written notice but they never give. Notice Requirement is 3 months from both side.
My Official ID was blocked only on 07-12-2009. Toady on 08-12-2009 I have received e-mail from HR on my personal mail ID with a cc to GM Finance and Vice president. It is a transfer intimation as follow:
“Mr. Manoj,
We are pleased to inform you that you have been transferred from DELHI to Head Office effect from 10th December 2009.”
I do not want to go HO as it will be HELL. Please suggest urgently can I place my resignation now with three months notice.
Actually if it was so easy to have a job in hand I would already had resigned a few months back. But to leave a job in short span (I joined 19.05.08) was never seem to be good for my career.
Please Advise!