LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Ranbir   29 January 2019 at 06:06

non joinder of necessary party

dear sir, i had filed cases against three parties in consumer forum the op no.1 despite receiving notice did not come op no.2 appeared but op no.3 did not come and postal department returned the notice to the consumer forum stating the op no.3 has left the premises now the ld forum has directed me to provide me the address where op no.3 or the court would dismiss the case as non joinder of necessary party what should be done

RAJESH KHANNA mob 09780573241   29 January 2019 at 05:53

Nclt

SIR IF A COMPANY declaring the Moratorium in terms of sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the code wheither proceeding us 138 of ni act can be continue against co or case return to complaintant

Adv Rajesh khanna
9780573241

Prerana m Agavekar   29 January 2019 at 00:56

Rejection of application filed u/s. 41d of bpt act

If application u/s. 41D of Bombay Public Trust Act is rejected by Charity Commissioner. what will be the next steps to challenge the said rejection order of of charity commissioner and which court has jurisdiction.

Anonymous   28 January 2019 at 21:56

No agreement in land division

Hello respected wise people..

In a hindu succussion act matter , of ancestral property..
After long case duration
Parties mutually agreed .
There were 6 people . 5 sisters n 1 one brother
They decided to divide land
3 acre approx each from 18 acre land approx


But there is no agreement in them that which part wil the which one .

How this matter can be resolved legally.??

Anonymous   28 January 2019 at 21:54

No agreement in land division

Hello respected wise people..

In a hindu succussion act matter , of ancestral property..
After long case duration
Parties mutually agreed .
There were 6 people . 5 sisters n 1 one brother
They decided to divide land
3 acre approx each from 18 acre land approx


But there is no agreement in them that which part wil the which one .

How this matter can be resolved legally.??

Anonymous   28 January 2019 at 21:34

Civil

My query is genuine
But posted as anonymous as I want to keep it secret from other stakeholders including lawyers.
Suit against me and status quo breach application against me is not tenable, I am almost certain now.
Contempt Application filed three yrs back.
After filing plaintiff evidence in 2014 Plaintiffs except filing status quo breach application against me in Aug 2015 has not filed any fresh document, still plaintiffs evidence went on till Dec 2017. I /my lawyer did not file reply against contempt application My lawyer was also lawyer of one of the key and surviving plaintiff and I did not trust him.
After that in Feb 2018 no defendant evidence given but court hearing . I hired new lawyer, he is not double crossing but not making necessary applications to end the suit. 18 dates have passed , I am not issued any notice.
Application as I guess are not numbered / registered.
My present lawyer told me I will call you when required. As that time no lawyer was ready to defend me due to nexus, I did not have courage to discuss the case, also out of frustration I had shown willingness for out of court settlement to my new lawyer.
Plaintiffs asked very high amount, later on when I studied the papers I am almost certain that suit and contempt application not tenable. All issues framed are obviously found going against plaintiffs.
Contempt application filed application for cause of action before issues were framed and after filing plaintiff evidence which contradicts the contempt application.
Plaintiffs, lawyers although case not tenable interested in keeping the suit alive.
How to get out of the quagmire / nightmare. I am 65.Difficult to open up with my new lawyer.
Please advise if you can.



Ajey Panday   28 January 2019 at 20:04

Orders

The lower court order was given in vernacular. I cannot read it. Any option available to request the court to provide the translated version?( Other than the one which we itself do with local translaters)

Deepak   28 January 2019 at 17:02

Pay protection on repatriation under lien period

Sir
I worked in the Income Tax Dept. as Tax Assistant in 2400 GP for three years and then on selection as Inspector in Central Excise
I gave technical resignation and joined in GP of 4600 as Inspector.
After almost 3 years as Inspector in GP 4600 I joined my Tax Assistant post in Income Tax as I was holding Lien for 3 years on the
post of TA.
Now since I had completed my probation in 4600 GP and cleared the Departmental Conformation Examination in 4600 GP. Am I entitled for
play protection under FR 22 considering my transfer as On request transfer under 15 (a) as per the DoPT circular no. 12/1/2016-Estt(pay-I) dt. 31.03.2017?

Anonymous   28 January 2019 at 17:02

Power of attorney

My question is a bank required to enter into a service level agreement with the other and that other party requires copy of power of attorney for signing this agreement. Now whaether special power of attorney requires or general power of attonrey required.

and stamp duty rate for such power of attorney?

its urgent.

juli   28 January 2019 at 15:40

Power of attorney

My question is a bank required to enter into a service level agreement with the other and that other party requires copy of power of attorney for signing this agreement. Now whaether special power of attorney requires or general power of attonrey required.

and stamp duty rate for such power of attorney?

its urgent.