Shakeel
06 September 2019 at 16:08
Dear Sir, We had one shipment from Saudi through there sales office based in Dubai, it was plastic raw material. shipment is done in Jan and arrived in Feb. As per the contract, we have agreed on the description of goods and results of the test was shared.
Seller provided us test results/actually it was fabricated, we came to know at the later stage.
Seller after loading container sent us pictures of loading with the closing container and sealed it and provided us seal number. But the seal was changed twice as per BL copy.
When the container arrived at Nhava Sheva we have cleared it and took this to Telangana, when we tested we have found material was not up to the mark. Seller doesn't want to listen nor want to negotiate.
how we can solve this by filing a complaint to DGFT or Indian Embassy or chamber of commerce or any other course of action. The seller has good business in India as well.
Regard;s
Shakeel
06 September 2019 at 16:06
Dear Sir, We had one shipment from Saudi through there sales office based in Dubai, it was plastic raw material. shipment done in Jan and arrived in Feb. As per the contract, we have agreed on description of goods and results of test was shared.
Seller provided us test results/actually it was fabricated, we came to know at later stage.
Seller after loading container sent us pictures of loading with the closing container and sealed it and provided us seal number. But seal was changed twice as per BL copy.
When the container arrived at Nhava Sheva we have cleared it and took this to Telangana, when we tested we have found material was not upto the mark. Seller doesn't want listed nor want to negotiate.
how we can solve this by filing complaint to DGFT or Indian Embassy or chamber of commerce or any othe course of action. Seller has good business in India as well.
Regard;s
Tushar vishnu shinde
06 September 2019 at 13:17
Dear sir,
Pl advice me that i my society we have issued notice to all member that we have to replast our society so pl bring quotation
so 5 quotation came from that we have finalised 1 quotation and that quotation read in front of all member
in quotation only society back side chember is going to repair but member are saying builder had said them both back and front side chember will repair.
so we said them no in quotation only back side repairing work will done
so now they are saying u should have issue quotation to each home i said them we have discussed in meeting that
now what i should do builder saying i had said verberly to do both side chember but in my quotation i have just mention back side
now member saying secretary to take in wrinting that builder said both side will do.
AJAY
06 September 2019 at 12:12
Mr. A sold a house to Mr. B on 01.01.2008 and Mr. B sold that house to Mr. C on 01.01.2010. Mr. C got transferred the electricity connection of Mr. B in his name in May 2010, wherein there were no dues and bill was ZERO. Mr. C paid his all electricity bills regularly. Electricity Company raised a demand of Rs. 20,000 in August 2019 as arrear in bill to Mr. C for dues pending of Mr. A pertaining to period from year 2005 to year 2008. Never before this demand/ arrear were raised in electricity bill to Mr. C. This property is in Delhi, so DERC regulations are applicable. Kindly help me with providing any legal case as well to resolve following: 1. Can Electricity Company raise a demand after 12 years, while all these years they did not intimate Mr. C. 2. DERC regulations 2017, 4th Amendment (dt: 24.05.2019) provides as following: (iii) The request for transfer of connection shall not be approved unless all recoverable dues in respect of the concerned connection are fully paid: Provided that once connection is transferred, no dues / arrears shall be recovered from the new consumer. Although these regulations are prospective in nature, isn't it wrong on part of Electricity Company to not intimate demand/dues/arrear for 12 long years. Kindly help. Thanks in Advance.
Read more at: http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/modify_message.asp?entry_id=871879
AJAY
06 September 2019 at 11:29
Mr. A sold a house to Mr. B on 01.01.2008 and Mr. B sold that house to Mr. C on 01.01.2010. Mr. C got transferred the electricity connection of Mr. B in his name in May 2010, wherein there were no dues and bill was ZERO. Mr. C paid his all electricity bills regularly. Electricity Company raised a demand of Rs. 20,000 in August 2019 as arrear in bill to Mr. C for dues pending of Mr. A pertaining to period from year 2005 to year 2008. Never before this demand/ arrear were raised in electricity bill to Mr. C. This property is in Delhi, so DERC regulations are applicable.
Kindly help me with providing any legal case as well to resolve following:
1. Can Electricity Company raise a demand after 12 years, while all these years they did not intimate Mr. C.
2. DERC regulations 2017, 4th Amendment (dt: 24.05.2019) provides as following:
(iii) The request for transfer of connection shall not be approved unless all recoverable dues in respect of the concerned connection are fully paid:
Provided that once connection is transferred, no dues / arrears shall be recovered from the new consumer.
Although these regulations are prospective in nature, isn't it wrong on part of Electricity Company to not intimate demand/dues/arrear for 12 long years.
Kindly help. Thanks in Advance.
Anonymous
06 September 2019 at 11:21
Dear Sir,
We are fighting a NI 138 case in sessions court as accused convicted by the trial court, with lot of inputs I have received form this legal forum I have been reading through, I have found substantial evidence to rebut my case wherein the entire return memo sent by the bank was flawed. Bank name in legal notice is different that off return memo, bank branch is wrong, branch code was wrong, MICR code on the return memo was wrong and it only mentioned cheque no and so and so returned for so and so amount due to insufficient funds saying branch manager and some signature nor its a letter head nor seal/stamped. My present lawyer overlooked all this and I am seeking expert advice as we are at the argument stage in the sessions court now, with the entire return memo flawed from top to bottom what remedy do I have in place. I can consult anyone in person even if this is a paid service to seek a thorough advice on my case position.
Anonymous
06 September 2019 at 10:46
Mr X has purchased a property and got it registered in 1997. Sale deed was executed by the power of attorney holder of the owner.
The property was originally a temple property which was managed by Mr 'Y' as a tenent and during 70s through the Land Reforms Act of Karnataka Mr 'Y' became the owner of the property. And through the Power of Attorney he sold it to X in 1997. In the year 2012, Mr Y's brother's son goes to the court claiming that it was a Joint family property and Mr Y had no rights to sell the property. And also claims that the POA's signature is fake.
The whole deal has taken place in Bangalore. An OS No. is generated and the notice is displayed near the property now.
Please clarify on the following ponts:
1. What is the locus standi of the petitioner in this case claiming the right over the property of which the ownership was got by his uncle as tenent through Land Reformation Act
2. Can he dispute a deal after 15 years of its taking place?
3 What is the way out for Mr X now?
Manoharan
06 September 2019 at 09:39
There is a saying "If a person dies in a Motor vehicle accident, there is a Supreme Court judgment under MV Act 1988, that if the victim is filing ITR for the last 3 years, Govt. should give 10 times of his 3 years annual salary, as compensation." Is it correct. Kindly clarify.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Import.export - cheated in business by supplying bad quality
Dear Sir,
We have bought 1 FCL plastic raw material reprocessed material through Dubai trading and manufacturing company. Sales office of the company is based in Dubai and manufacturing is in Saudi.
Loading was done from Saudi in Jan and arrived in Feb at Nhava Sheva port of India. After loading was done seller-provided us pictures of material and sealed the container and provided us seal number photo as well.
When material reached Nhava Sheva and was taken to Telangana by road and when we tested the material it was not as per specs, lower grade material and doesn’t meet with specs.
When we check all documents we have found a discrepancy in documents like the seal was changed 2 times before reaching loading port as per BL records.
The discrepancy in test result as well, during the, have to use specified weight, the seller has used differently to achieve desired results.
We have appointed an inspection agency and got tested in different labs within India. All material failed. We tried to negotiate with the seller for compensation, but he doesn’t want to listen to us.
Please guide, where we can approach like DGFT, Indian Embassy, Indian chamber of commerce or any other file complaint or to blacklist the company.
Regard’s
Shakeel