Anonymous
19 September 2011 at 11:53
I got IEC and imported the cosmetics on the code which was addressed to My name as properitor and myhome address as my address. Now the goods are here and the CHA/transporter asking my Vat no. which I dont have. does it makes illegal to bring the items cleared from the customs to chandigarh from delhi( address on the shipment is of chandigarh and custom clearance is done at delhi).If i apply for a vat no. it requires a firm name and address(commercial). Can i get vat no. on my name as in My IEC code. If the address different does it create any problem for releasing the goods through states barrier?
can i get vat no on different address than my IEC code make any difference as I am the owner of the both.
Pls advice i still have goods in delhi and never moved them from there.
Waiting for the experts comments
sandeep Upadhyay
17 September 2011 at 13:05
Dear all experts
Recently published notification of cenvat credit rule 2004 of c.ex.No22/2011 c.ex(N.T)dtd.14.09.2011.
What is exact interpretation of this notification?if we have paid duty less than one crore during year 2010-11 through cenvat+PLA, We required to now e-file er4,er5 & er6?
Request to all experts give guideline in this matter.It will be useful to all.
Thanks
sandip
Anbazhagan
16 September 2011 at 13:11
Dear All,
Request you to clarify on the following areas.
1.Whether the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 is applicable to building and other construction activities – eg, Road laying, bridge construction, culvert construction etc.?
2. Under BOCW act who has to obtain registration? Principal Employer or sub-contractors and sub-contractors.
3.Is it a right procedure obtaining labour license under Contract Labour Act for the Construction sites, Road Project where contract employees are employed which falls under the provision of BOCW act?
HIRAL THAKKAR
15 September 2011 at 14:03
Can any one forward me the maharashtra government notification that interest on delayed gratuity i.e beyond 30 days i.e simple interest is 12% p.a
Arka Foundation
15 September 2011 at 00:08
RTE effect:
City’s private schools must apply afresh for recognition
source:
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/rte-effect-citys-private-schools-must-appl/760907/
RituSharma
Tags : Right to Education Act, DEO Chanchal Singh.
Posted: Fri Mar 11 2011, 01:06 hrs
Chandigarh:
With the implementation of the Right to Education (RTE) Act in Chandigarh, it will be mandatory for all private schools in the city to apply for fresh recognition within three months of the date of implementation. The recognition, to be granted by the UT Education Department, would be allowed on the basis of a self-declaration form, the six-page proforma for which has already been prepared and uploaded on the official website making it accessible to schools.
All schools, irrespective of whether they are already recognised or their recognition or renewal case is under process, as is the case with many private schools, have to apply afresh now. No financial burden has been attached with the recognition process for the schools as the Department has exempted any application fee for it.
Going by the RTE Act implemented on February 11 through a circular released by the office of the District Education Officer (DEO), all private unaided schools would be filling the ‘self declaration-cum-application for grant of recognition of school’ form and submitting it to the DEO within three months.
In this regards, Fresh recognition for aided and
un-aided schools in Andhra Pradesh is applicable?
clarifications please
DWARIKA PRASAD
14 September 2011 at 22:37
I need a copy of the circular issued by Honorable Bombay High Court regarding fixing age limit for senior citizens for early hearing .I understand that with the consent of all the high court judges ,in 1999 a circular was issued by Honorable Chief Justice to fix 65 years for senior citizens for early hearing in the pending matters.
Pl help me.
Ayappan
12 September 2011 at 19:22
Thanks a lot for the guidance.
As for proper guidance full details and the error in the pedigree is sought
The same is given as under.
The Kartha was the father of the widow, (who died after the son born through 2nd wife). Kartha had 2 wives. Through First wife he has 3 sons and two daughters, (First wife was the last to die)& 2nd wife has one son (who predeceased his mother and father) and a daughter who is the widow mentioned.
One of her sisters born through the first wife is also a widow.
There are two sets of properties the first set inherited by the Kartha out of a partition deed among his brothers Ancestral Property), and another set self earned.
The counsel made a mistake of interchanging the mothers when drawing the shares through the tree and subsequent matter detailing the same.
Now all the brothers and sisters have sons or daughters. The 2nd wife's son has left a widow and 2 daughters. , I hope this is brief tree which could be provide for clarity. I tried to copy the tree and post which was not possible. I look for clarity on the issue of correcting at this juncture, when they are taking to High court. Because the current counsel mentioned it is not possible. As the grounds for appeal is on the improper division of shares as the judgement did not provide any share from the ancestral property. The property consists of land both dry and wet lands, house. The brothers had submitted to the court a division dubiously fabricated before some Panchayat where the signature of the Kartha seem to be forged and this division do not include the 3 daughters and the two wives. This is the brief summary of the issue. Kindly guide.
suresh phadkule
11 September 2011 at 16:46
A unregistered body temporarily formed for religious activities collected donations for religious activities, and then sought to incur this amount on construction of a building to be used for religious activities of a registered religious public trust by mutural agreement with the trust as well as the donors. Can this be done lawfully? Whether this attracts provisions of BPT Act 1950 or any other statute?
rksoni
11 September 2011 at 13:32
400000/- is debited to Discount on purchases.the amt has been debited to Trading A/c and had reduced from total purchases.But the supplier has not claimed any credit for the same i.e.had paid all the vat according to our gross purchases.He had also forwarded the undertaking for not reversing the tax into his returns. But ,the vato is unsatisfied & had determined the tax,interest & penalty thereon.
In fact,the dealer has received the credit note after every quarter. It is also confirmed by the supplier that he had forwarded the credit note on A/c of Turnover discount and paying off the amt of said purchases before time i.e.cash discount.BUT,ONE ANOTHER PROBLEM IS THAT THE DISCOUNT HAS BEEN REDUCED FROM THE PURCHASES IN OUR BALANCE SHEET WHICH HAS ALREADY BEEN SUBMITTED TO CONCERN AUTHORITY.PL.ADVICE ME CAN WE CHALLENGE HIS ORDER AND IF POSSIBLE PL.GUIDE ME THE SUITABLE CITATIONS.BOTH THE SALER & BUYER ARE REGD DEALER FROM DELHI.THX.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Bmc act, d d regulation
Dear Sir,
1) A building constructed as per approved plans by BMC commissioner and also approved by second BMC commissioner can be reviewed or reversed by the present Commissioner?
2) Can BMC commissioner demand Security Deposit from Developer who has constructed the building as per approved plans ?
3) Under which Rules of BMC Act or DCR BMC commissioner has power to demand such Security on a pretext that it will be misused by the Flat purchaser??
Kindly advice me on above query.
I shall be thankful to you for your important advice.
Thanking you