Legal rights of a widow in her ancestral and self earned proprety of her father
Ayappan
(Querist) 12 September 2011
This query is : Open
Thanks a lot for the guidance.
As for proper guidance full details and the error in the pedigree is sought
The same is given as under.
The Kartha was the father of the widow, (who died after the son born through 2nd wife). Kartha had 2 wives. Through First wife he has 3 sons and two daughters, (First wife was the last to die)& 2nd wife has one son (who predeceased his mother and father) and a daughter who is the widow mentioned.
One of her sisters born through the first wife is also a widow.
There are two sets of properties the first set inherited by the Kartha out of a partition deed among his brothers Ancestral Property), and another set self earned.
The counsel made a mistake of interchanging the mothers when drawing the shares through the tree and subsequent matter detailing the same.
Now all the brothers and sisters have sons or daughters. The 2nd wife's son has left a widow and 2 daughters. , I hope this is brief tree which could be provide for clarity. I tried to copy the tree and post which was not possible. I look for clarity on the issue of correcting at this juncture, when they are taking to High court. Because the current counsel mentioned it is not possible. As the grounds for appeal is on the improper division of shares as the judgement did not provide any share from the ancestral property. The property consists of land both dry and wet lands, house. The brothers had submitted to the court a division dubiously fabricated before some Panchayat where the signature of the Kartha seem to be forged and this division do not include the 3 daughters and the two wives. This is the brief summary of the issue. Kindly guide.
