Vishnu
01 August 2012 at 07:01
Is there any deadline to convert NRO deposits into NRE....
please provide me the details
a k pandey
31 July 2012 at 20:20
Husband has filed T.E.P. against his FIL for claim of giving dowry of 15 lakhs in FIR under 498a. FIL has submitted his explanation to I.T. Deptt. where he has given expenditure details of Rs.9,90,000/- only without any proof and claiming to get this amounts from his friends and relatives. I.T.O. has submitted his report to close the T.E.P. enquiry.
FIL has claimed of getting gold 15 tola and silver 100 tola and Rs.3 lakhs from his FIL before his death for marriage of his grand-daughter which he has given to husband as his FIL has no son. Whether this explanation is valid proof of giving dowry of gold 15 tola and silver 100 tola and other household articles of Rs.3 lakhs.
This information has been collected by husband from clerk of I.T. Deptt. unofficially. Husband has seen this written statements.
Whether FIL's written statement and I.T.Officer's Enquiry report can be collected from I.T. Deptt. under Right to Information.
Rohit Kurmi
31 July 2012 at 19:45
a society is on a leasehold land, Lessor being a BMC, i.e municipal corporation,
earlier a lease deed was signed for 999 yrs with a lessee. however the lessee went out of country, giving a Power to another person.
now through this power he constructed a building vide development agreement with builder,
members of building came together and formed a soceity. now they are opting for deem conveyance/ deed of assignment in favour of scoeity.
is it possible, to soceity to become a lessee thorugh deem conveyance, teh land originally belongs to municipal corporation .
snehashree
31 July 2012 at 19:15
Respected Sir,
I worked in IAF and during that period I purchased a house a plot along with a constructed house from a housing society in 1995. As advised by the then president and secretary of the society, I applied for the membership and they gave me a letter of accepting my application for membership and allotment of the plot number 9 along with the building over it. Plot number 8 was not alltted to anybody because no body could construct anything on it due to overhead HT cable running over the area. After a few years, in a general meeting (This does not take place regularly as expected by law) myself and the owner of Plot number 7 proposed the society members and the appointments that since it is of no use to any body, the plot number 8 may be sold to us and we are ready to pay the amount stated by the society on the terms and conditions of the society. The then president and secretary of the society gave us a letter giving us extract of the minutes of meeting accepting our proposal followed by a letter on the societies letter head and under the signature of President and secretary stating that as per the minuted of the meeting, they are in receipt of the money from the owners of Plot number 7 and 9 and the ownership of plot number 8 has been given to us with the condition that we will not construct any thing on it. Since then we are in possession of the land since then.
Now after retirement from IAF the present President and secretary has asked to honour the commitment that no commitment at that time was given on stamp paper and as such they do not recognise our ownership of the plot number 7. The president and secretary who gave us the letter are not alive.
May I kindly request your expert advice on what course of action should I follow? I am in possession of the property. The owner of plot number 7 has been telling me that nothing can happen since we have letter written by the president and secretary on the societies letter pad. But being from IAF I wish to get every thing done properly so that when I decide to sell the property, nobody objects to it and the new owner does not face difficulty in enjoying peaceful possession of the property.
Please advice further course of action?
With warm regards.
Gp Capt (Retd)Shrikant Walwadkar
Bangalore
SHANMUGARAJ
31 July 2012 at 18:44
dear sir/madam
any statuary provision for quantification of hazardous chemical industry (explosive) supervisor please note
purushottaman
31 July 2012 at 17:24
single dwelling house whree familymembers ar coowners. one of thefamily membes has soldhis share to a person who is not a memebr of the family, a stranger totally., the family membes have availe a stay and has prevented thestranger/transferee in getting possession/entry into the property. he has now filed a suit for partition. the family membes are clear that the property should be retained as asingle swelling house in memory of the "grandfather" and where teh famly memebrs could meet periodically. The stranger has purchased his hsre for 9 lakhs as per the document. In case of the court decrees the sale of his portion to any of the famly member indivudually or severally, what could be the upset pricew that the courtr could decide. AFter the stranger transferee has investsed in this share knowing fully well the facts and the provisions of the law. Should the other co-owners have to pay the price for a bad investment or the stranger transferee pay for the loss in hi sinvestsment ?
cheshta
31 July 2012 at 17:01
Hi all
Please resolve my query on:-
My Client has lost share certificates the stamp duty was paid on original share certificates.
Now on reissue of share certificates is there any requirement to repay stamp duty?
Please advise with reference the company is registered in New Delhi.
amit
31 July 2012 at 13:21
Sir,
I am serving army officer and is interested in the above exam which govt have held for state police officer,cpos and armed force officer with 35 yrs of age.
As a background the following are fact-
1. As per Army rule,a permanent commission officer can only be eligible if he supersedes.Selection Board take place in 15 yr of service.EVEN IF COMMISSIONING AGE is 20 yrs as in case of Ex NDA.offrs.they will be eligible only at age of 35 yrs.
2. In case of short service officer,he can apply for civil employment at the last 6 months of final yr of his agreement.Now SSC is for 10 yrs.Average age is 24 yrs when SSC offr get selected and 25 at time of commission.In this case also he is not able to write exam as he is turning 35 yrs.
IN BOTH CASES OPPORTUNITY IS BEING DENIED TO ARMY OFFICERS EVEN THEY ARE ALLOWED TO WRITE EXAM BY GOVT BECAUSE OF AGE.
SECOND issue ,
is pertaing to cut off bench mark of age which as per Ministry of home affair rule is 1 aug.
The CPO offrs age is considered on aug bench mark during initial recruitment before writing departmental exam for IPS.
Howeever army recruitment is held twice in yr with jan and july as benchmark.Person selected in Jan written and ssb subsequently join academy for training in month of september that year and person selected in july exam in month of april next year.
My querry is
1. Can a case be taken up for relaxation of age for subject exam to 36 yrs from 35 yrs keeping the service condition of army officers.
2. If not,atleast a case can be taken up to MHA to reduce benchmark from 01 aug of that year to 01 jan of year,so as to enable officers of army to write exam at least one.
At least they should not be denied the right of equal opportunity viz a viz officerrs of CPO as the part OF MHA and following aug bench mark and army lossing being on differnt rule and using jan as bench mark.
PLEASE SOLICIT ADVISE AND RIGHT COURSE OF ACTION.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Meaning of "save and excepting" in the deed
Sir,
My name is Sadanand Bhisaji Panchal.I have obtained a deed of conveyance of the year 1973 regarding the sale of the land where I am residing. In the said deed the landlord described his property as " Vendor is absolutely seized and possessed the land and hereditaments together with the structures thereon save and excepting those belonging to the (name of) owner of our chawl"
Please explain me whether the landlord had excluded our chawl from the sale in the contract of the deed?
Is the said contract supposed to be sell of entire land or it might became incomplete sell.
Is this type of the deed can be treated as null and void? under which Act?
Best Regards,
Sadanand B.Panchal