harmendersingh
20 May 2015 at 09:36
Experts,
I have a query regarding the recent judgment of Hon. Supreme court dated 17.03.2015 quashing Gazette notification No. 63 dated 04.03.2014 thus set aside OBC quota for jats in 9 northern states.
But the case of rajasthan is special as except bharatpur and dhaulpur districts jats of rajathan are in OBC list since sept 1999.
So i request you to please clarify what is the present status of Jat of rajasthan.
Thank you
Raanjkumar
18 May 2015 at 12:51
sir, I have given my flat on lease alongwith 1 open parking alloted to me by society. I also have 1 more stilt parking owned by me, which I have allowed another member to park his car.I do not stay in the same society.
My question:
Can the society object in any way, and or disallow me from entering the building and use the stilt parking in future ?
Advocate.S.A.Siddiq
18 May 2015 at 09:45
Guardianship order obtained by fraud and concealed - after 12 years respondent of GWOP filed section 5 petition with setaside petition
In sec.5 petition - RW1 & RW2 examined and cross examined- now respondent side filing IA petition u/s 151cpc for examine the junior bailiff of the court -
Without allowing the Sec.5 petition , Is this proceeding is correct ?
R.Ramesh
18 May 2015 at 09:14
Dear Sir,
In salary break-ups Basic,HRA,Convenience and Medical Reimbursement or Medical Allowance these components are mandatory as per law or not.
Thanking you,
Ramesh
mohanasundaram
10 May 2015 at 08:57
my friend needs LT connection from tneb for his house as his house is in poramboke land.when he approached the concerned office they said noc from tashildar is must for getting LT connection for domestic purpose.is there any alternate way to get LT connection for the house build in poramboke lands in tamilnadu.
Anonymous
05 May 2015 at 08:19
I, a resident of Mumbai had got my name changed which I wanted to update in my AADHAR. I have to tried to do this 3 times but my application keeps getting rejected. I have given valid documents for name change. First I gave the publication of name change in Maharashtra Gazette. The second time I sent it by post. And now for the third time I tried to use online portal. I had submitted a certificate of identity by gazetted officer on letterhead as proof. However, yet again it got rejected. I don't know what i'm doing wrong. I'm submitting the documents mentioned on the website and what the call centre executives advised me. Please help. I need to update name in aadhar as early as possible.
Kvijay12345
30 April 2015 at 14:19
my friend had taken a vehicle loan and dispite of his several requests for the copies of the loan relevent docs, the nbfc for three years failed to furnish any copies of these loan related docs including the sanction letter and the loan agreement which were signed blank by my friend at the time of the processing of the loan. Meanwhile he continued to pay the EMI on loan and finally when he realised that the nbfc is not willing to give him copies of those loan docs,he stopped the EMI on loan after the intimation to the nbfc.Then after three years my friend got loan docs in which he observed many discrepencies which he immediately brought into the notice of nbfc. There was a dispute over these loan documents including the loan agreement. Instead of solving the dispute, the NBFC got the arbitration award passed in its favor without the knowledge to the consumer and towed away his vehicle forcibly without giving any intimation to him or local police station and also without giving the copy of this arbitration award to the consumer. The consumer therefore moved to the District Consumer Forum seeking for the compensation.Now the NBFC have filed their say stating they have possesed the vehicle with the help of that arbitration award.I have heard that such disputed loan documents can not be utilised for arbitration proceedings before solving the dispute and an award based on these disputed papers is invalid.Can the disputed loan documents including the loan agreement be utilised for arbitration proceedings and the arbitration award be passed based on those disputed loan documents? Is such an arbitration award passed based on the disputed loan documents is valid and can the vehicle financed be towed away with the help of such an arbitration award by the NBFC without going through Execution proceeding in the civil court to repossess the vehicle? under which section of the The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,the award passed on the disputed papers is invalid?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
To get will probated in rajasthan
Respected Sirs,
I have seen Respected sir Makkar opinion at below thread:
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Is-it-necessary-to-Get-Probate-of-a-Will-In-Rajasthan--58796.asp#.VI0BDdKUdr0
Yes. It is mandatory in Rajasthan even.
Whereas Respected sir s.subramanian has opined at below thread:
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Probate-of-Will-131021.asp#.VIzZetKUdr0
dear Bretheren,
I beg pardon for this belated reply. first of all,I would like to clarify that probating of wills is not compulsory at all under Sec.57 of the Indian Succession Act,if they are executed outside the limits of the original civil jurisdiction of the High Courts of Madras and Mumbai and West Bengal. So,if a will is executed in the places abovesaid the need for probating the same will arise. this has been explained very well in the judgment of the Supreme Court of India in Clarence Pais Vs Union of India (AIR 2001 S.C. 1151). A combined readng of Sec.57 and 213 of the Indian Succession Act would show that where the parties to the will are Hindus or the properties are not in territories falling under Sec.57 (a) and (b),Sec.213(2) applies and Sec.213(1) has no application. As a consequence,a probate will not be required to be obtained by a Hindu in respect of a will made outside those territories.
With the amendment brought to the Indian Succession Act,1925 by the Indian Succession(Amendment )Act,2002 Act 26 of 2002 which came into effect on 27.5.2002, the wills executed by Indian Christians have also been taken outside the purview of Sec.213 of the IS Act. Hence there is no need for probating the wills of Muslims and Indian Christians. With regard to Hindus also the need for probate is limited to the areas set otu in Sec.57 of IS Act. Hope I clarified the issue.
thanks
S.Subramanian.
Opinion at below thread by Respected sir Sh Hemant Agrawal :
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Registered-Will-is-probate-must-10323.asp#.VVb7Prmqqko
4. The issue of "Probate" is a state law AND in some states, the state govt's have exempted the probation of "will" (eg. rajasthan). However all the "presidency towns" of India, have to compulsorily "probate" the will for execution purposes (eg. Bombay, Delhi, Madras, Calcutta etc...)
So please guide whether it is mandatory or not to get will probated in Rajasthan.