sudhakar s. yeradkar
11 June 2015 at 14:34
Dear Sir,
The Lease Agreement of my flat duly registered has been submitted to the office bearers of our Co-op Hsg society alongwith copy of police verification and copies of several articles including of Shri.Hemant Agarwalji regarding NON-OCCUPANCY charges.
Despite of given several articles and copy of bye-laws explaining the term of non-occupancy charges our society have not stopped charging extra charges to the flats, which are given on rental. As they are might be aware about it.
The society is putting heavy amount under different head like administrative charges only for the rental flats.
Would like to know is it legal if it is decided in the AGM to charge extra charges to the rented flats.
Please advise so as to take appropriate action in the matter.
Regards,
sunilkumar
11 June 2015 at 12:58
My mother who owns her own property,is ther any possibility of fraud,as she has a single child,due to weak english reading she has a doubt that she has signed some stamp papers for her brother
Plz help me with a solution
Thank you
Dr.B.Ravi Kumar
11 June 2015 at 07:31
The merit of the case is the death of a 24 year old lactating lady with an one year old child. The gynecologist(second accused) administered inj.Ampicillin for renal colic. This was not warranted. The final diagnosis of the gynecologist is pelvic inflammatory disease. But the gynecologist has not done a per vaginal examination which is the sheet anchor of the diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease. The test dose was not properly done and the total dose was administered. The patient started having breathlessness, HALLMARK of allergic reaction for which inj.Diazepam was given by duty doctor (first accused)who is 60 years old. The patient stopped breathing and the anesthetist came and intubated her. Then the anesthetist(third accused) ABANDONED the patient.
The patient was then referred to another hospital for ventilatory support. At that time a reference letter was given to the husband of the patient. The reference letter(evidence act 106) is silent about both injections Ampicillin and Diazepam. Subsequent conduct(evidence act 8) in the sense in consumer forum Kollam, State consumer forum Trivandrum, Sessions Court Kollam and High Court of Kerala they are silent about Inj.Diazepam.
The stay for the criminal case will expire on 30/6/15. They got the stay stating that they want to appeal before the Supreme Court.
The charge is under I.P.C. 304 Part(II) based on I.P.C. 299(3). This is because of the following explanation. Explanation 2.—Where death is caused by bodily injury, the person who causes such bodily injury shall be deemed to have caused the death, although by resorting to proper remedies and skillful treatment the death might have been prevented. But I feel it will come under I.P.C. 300(4) since the INTENTION was to hide the incompetence with FIRST degree KNOWLEDGE that DEATH is IMMINENT (with a high degree of probability which is only a mathematical proposition) if the antidote injection Adrenaline is not given. In this case POSSIBILITY(not probability of DEATH) is 100% if the antidote is not given because of CONCEALMENT of drug history.
Pawar Pankaj
10 June 2015 at 19:54
Hello Experts,
In 2012, I was planning to buy a Property being listed on 99 acres.com in Mumbai. The Property was Mhada redevelopment, but all the tenants of the Building were trying to convert the property into Ownership. No such procedure was completed from Mhada end, but the Building even then formed a Society, made Share Certificates, made Society letter heads, coloured the building making the Mhada sign/Logo disappear, etc.
I as an Outsider didnt knew any of this. The seller "THOUGHT", that Property was ownership due to above incidences and told me that Loan is available on the said property. He being the Society Secretary or so gave me in writing on Society's letterhead, that the Property is saleable legally.
Public sector Bank also didnt perform their Due diligence and told me that, Loan is available on the Property.
Old Custom House also accepted the Stamp duty and Registration of the Same.
The final step, Bank asked for Mortagage Lien on the same property to disburse the Loan, it was then one Chairman of the society, who told us, the Society Ownership Conversion Process was still not complete and hence it is still a Mhada Property on which no loan is available and hence, No Mortagage Lien is possible.
It took me over 2 years to recover the Stamp Duty money from Old custom House, Registration of ₹30k was nonrefundable.
The Seller returned me 70% of black money in parts over 6 months but other losses like Registration, Interest, etc was never returned by him.
He was threatening me actually (due to which, my family never allowed me as a Single Woman to file FIR), even though, it was his mistake and foolish of thinking, that Property is saleable.
He of course, sold his Property in 100% Black and refuses to reimburse my losses of ₹ 4 to 5 lacs and refuses to accept, it was never my mistake.
Is it possible to sue him and send a legal notice against him now after 3 years? What are my chances of recovering my losses in this Lawsuit? I have all the Stamp duty and Registration Documents and Society Letterhead.
Do i need to file an FIR before suing him?
Please help me to get justice and guide me through this..
rajeshs
10 June 2015 at 11:17
Sir/Madam, I have an query regarding Registration under SSI Please help me in this regard with your valuable advice.
1) Can a automobile dealer can be registered under SSI.
2) If yes, then please provide me procedure to do so, want to know, whether can we apply for registration online.
Experts please help me by providing useful link or advice.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Rajesh S
monica
10 June 2015 at 11:16
my father got farming land in gujrat by his mother side grandparent. my dad was raised by grand parents since he was 7 months old.his grand father died when he was around 5 years old.after that in inheritance property grand mother's name and his name was put in.as grand mother is step mother of my dad's real mother and they didn't get along well. so grandmother did not want to give anything to her.at that his mother went to court for her right on property but they just put her name as a legal guardian. after around 25 years now wants a property again so she went to court again and now court cancelled the last heirship (INHERITANCE ) of grandmother.and my father and his parent did not live together so she will not give anything to my father and she most likely give everything to her 3 other children rather than my father. so what can we do now.please help.
THANKS
Member (Account Deleted)
10 June 2015 at 10:58
my father got farming land in gujrat by his mother side grandparent. my dad was raised by grand parents since he was 7 months old.his grand father died when he was around 5 years old.after that in inheritance property grand mother's name and his name was put in.as grand mother is step mother of my dad's real mother and they didn't get along well. so grandmother did not want to give anything to her.at that his mother went to court for her right on property but they just put her name as a legal guardian. after around 25 years now wants a property again so she went to court again and now court cancelled the last heirship (INHERITANCE ) of grandmother.and my father and his parent did not live together so she will not give anything to my father and she most likely give everything to her 3 other children rather than my father. so what can we do now.please help.
THANKS
Ashish Pandey
09 June 2015 at 19:21
Hello,
My father has been residing at Mumbai in a chawl since 1985. He applied for change in address over his Voting card along with the corresponding Voter list in the year 1995. Based on his application he received the acknowledgement receipt by filling form8 for address change and the original Voting Card too. (Both of these original documents we have kept safely).
On the issued Voting card his new address was mentioned correctly but they did not update the same address in their record (based on which they provide 7-12 UTAARAA). We did not come to know the mistake as we had the original voting card over which correct address was mentioned. But the record at their end had been reflecting the previous address till the year 2007 and then after they updated their record. Now our room has come under redevelopment plan by SRA and they are compulsorily asking for my father’s voting card/ (7-12 Utaaraa)as an address proof of our current address. So we requested to the ‘Election Officer’ (Old Custom House, Churchgate, Mumbai) to make changes in their record (before 2000) but they just simply reverted back that they cannot modify the previous record , also they don’t have any record as ‘Chinchpokli Legislative Constituency’ has dissolved to ‘Byculla Legislative Constituency’.
In this context, to whom may I consult to escalate the issue so that I can prove my father’s existence over this address as this is the mandatory document required by BMC and if this issue will not get resolved our candidature may cancel. So please suggest the possible solutions.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Ashish Pandey
Syed Ashfaque Ahmad
09 June 2015 at 17:09
DV and 498a have been registered after a 20 years of the marraige of NRI. DV case have been dismissed by lower court after full dress trial including Husband and family members.Discharge application of Husband rejected by Lower Court in case of 498a because at this stage document submitted by accused cannot be refer by the court. Now Husband has submitted his discharge application u/s 397 Cr.pc in session court.Family memberes of Husband have been discharged in 498a case by Session Judge u/s 397 cr.pc (239 cr.pc rejected by lower court)on the ground of Double jeoparady (Only one incidence DV & 498a have been registered on the one & only one FIR & same facts. I would be grateful if u can provide or advise legal suitable suggesdtion for discharge arguement. I am fightining a csae in person. For ur kind information Charges have been not framed yet by lower court. I had filed writ petion under Article 226 read with Cr.p.c 482 In High Court. Hc partly allowed the petition and advised to challenge u.s 227 cr.p.c. Please suggest legal solution
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Case against car company fiat
I HAD PURCHASED A VEHICLE FROM FIAT IN DEC 2009. ON 18.08.2014,I MET AN ACCIDENT AND MY VEHICLE SUFFERED SOME DAMAGES AND REMAINED IMMOBILE. Since 22.08.2014, I have been in regular contact with FIAT for servicing and repairing of my vehicle. Since that time they have been misleading me by saying that their workshop at Guwahati and in the region will be ready in next 10-15 days and my vehicle will be served on priority basis. Now ten months has been eclipsed and on numerous dates given on writing, they have failed me. I have records of mails sent and received from. I have also sent a notice to them through post with acknowledgement card in the month of January 2015.
I have also offered them my permission to provide services and hence restore my vehicle anywhere.
Regarding the accident, I have already put up a claim with my insurer. The insurance company said, they need a quote from the workshop to start their part of work. FIAT even failed to provide me the quote or even inspected by vehicle despite the fact they gave in written that they will send somebody to inspect my car. Neither FIAT made the parts available or wanted to supply me.
Based on the above and all my recorded communication Can I claim a compensation suit against FIAT, as I have gone through lots of economic/professional losses as well as tremendous harassment. They not only didn't provided services or restored my vehicle but also mislead me occasions after occasions towards their readiness of providing services to me.