Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Davinder Kumar   08 November 2014 at 18:05

Property purchased under srfasi act from bank

Respected Sir I purchased a Residential Property under Open auction by Punjab Gramin Bank , & A Sale Certificate was issued to me. At the Time of Sale Bank Personal Told me that Stamp duty by District Registrar Will Not be levied as dedcided in a Unknown SC Judgement ,But Registrar is Demanding Stamp duty ,,,you are kindly requested to guide me what to do

balwinder123   08 November 2014 at 17:44

Maintenance

In case of maintenance, if minor filed a case against his father for past maintenance,in the court where minor resides, whether that court can issue injunction against the property of father who resides in another district.
please refer the citation.

Member (Account Deleted)   08 November 2014 at 17:41

Attestation form filling

The attestation form asks as :
(i)Whether expelled/discharged/withdrawn from any institute/training under government or otherwise?
(ii)If any case is pending against me in any court of law?
What should be my reply if I have been dismissed from public sector undertaking and I have filed a writ in High Court?

Anurag   08 November 2014 at 16:51

Drink and drive in mumbai.. need help urgently..

I have been caught with drink and driving in Mumbai.. They have charged me of section 185.. The blood alcohol content reading was 158. Paid the fine of INR 2100 and the policemen gave me the receipt for the same. Policemen have taken my byke and license and have asked to appear before the magistrate on Monday 8:30.. Do I need to hire a lawyer.. What can be the consequences of this crime..

My doubt is when I appear in front of the magistrate should I accept that I was under the influence of alcohol..

I wan't this to end asap.. Please suggest me what to do..

sanjay   08 November 2014 at 16:39

Self acquired property !!

Hellow I a 65 years hindu widow women and staying in delhi in my self-acquired property with younger son (married) and my elder son widow daughter in law. after my elder son death my widow DIL starting harassing & quarrel with me. she’s staying in the extended portion of my property. She has also keep one more girl alongwith her without my permission.
And they both are harassing and quarrel with me and want to grab my property. Now I have filed a suit of possession case against her.
They even not paying electricity and water bill which is coming almost more than 4000/ pm. We are already having a submeter for extended portion and present the bill reading to them on monthly basis but they are not paying the same. Till date my younger son was paying the bill, I was thinking that will get it done through court, but now hearing date is coming nearly in 2mts and its now becoming very difficult to pay the bill as our financial condition is also not well.

Kindly suggest:
Whether we need to disconnect her electricity connection.
Or should we wait for the jurisdiction.
Kindly also suggest:
Should we also need to file a eviction suit for the girl which is staying with widow DIL
Or is their any other way to evict her.

kindly provide your valuable solutions..

Suraj Kumar   08 November 2014 at 16:11

Legal hire vs nominee

1. Husband nominate his mother as nominee in bank .
2. Wife live saperately from husband .
3. Husband died.
If wife claim husband’s money from bank as legel hire and husband’s mother claim the same as nominee – who will get the money deposited in the bank ?

Suraj Kumar   08 November 2014 at 16:06

Nominee vs legal hire

1. Husband nominate his mother as nominee in bank .
2. Wife live saperately from husband .
3. Husband died.
If wife claim husband’s money from bank as legel hire and husband’s mother claim the same as nominee – who will get the money deposited in the bank ?

NEHA   08 November 2014 at 15:13

Objection raised unnecessarily to delay poceedings

Dear Sir,
The court ordered to release the Original papers to the plaintiff in absence of the Defendant. Now after the order for release and documents received by plaintiff, the defendant raised objection against why the documents had been released belonging to plaintiff stating reason that the intention of plaintiff to sell property during pendancy of suit.

What legal course of actions needs to be taken to ensure the original documents need not to be submitted by plantiff. Pls note that no Stay is granted to any party in the matter nor the Defendant submitted any documents as proof of its ownership over the property in dispute

Mrs R.Yadav   08 November 2014 at 15:06

Inspection of records by an authorized representative of the applicant under rti act 2005

Dear Experts,
I sought information underRTI Act 2005 from Income Tax Officer wherein I sought to inspect the assessment record of a private school. The Income Tax Officer intimated me the date of inspection . I gave authority letter to my husband to inspect the record on my behalf but CPIO-cum-Income Tax Officer denied to get the record inspected on the pretext that only applicant can inspect the record . He said that as per act ,any person authorized by applicant is not permissible to inspect the record.
My question is :
1. Whether CPIO-cum-Income Tax Officer islegally right in denying to get the record inspected by a person authorized by applicant ? If no, then kindly let me know the relevant rules under which a person authorized by applicant can inspect the record on behalf of applicant under RTI Act 2005.

SRINIVASA   08 November 2014 at 14:55

Trust property

My wife's maternal grand father has executed a will. In the will he has bequeated one property in favour of two trusts. He has appointed 5 family members as common trustees for both the trustees. 3/4 of the property is bequethed in favour of one trust having 6 beneficiaries. The other portion of 1/4 property is in favour of another trust. In the will he has stated that our of income from second trust contribution to be given to 6 schools and surplus if any to be given to students of his community and the children of beneficiaries are not barred from getting the benefit. He has also stated in the will that the trustees decision is final and cannot be questioned in any court of law.

My question is

whether the second trust is a private trust or a charitable trust. Because in the name of the trust as stated by the testator he has not mentioned as charitable trust. The beneficiaries are also not public at large. The trustees have the power to deny contributions to such institutions if they decide as such.

Kindly clarify