ravi
14 November 2014 at 09:42
"A" a self acquired property house owner and he has 3 sons "B","C" and "D" . Due to some problems "A" required some money . so shall "D" can purchase his fathers property with sale consideration according to market value ?
is it correct?
leeladhar
14 November 2014 at 09:30
Sir, I belong to scheduled caste in Sir, I belong to scheduled caste in madhya pradesh (mp). My grandfather madhya pradesh (mp). My grandfather transferred to Sagar (mp) from transferred to Sagar (mp) from maharastra in 1960. In his service maharastra in 1960. In his service record his caste would be either Hindu/record his caste would be either Hindu/Telugu as due to castcism he afraid of Telugu as due to castcism he afraid of being SC. he didn't get benefit of being being SC. he didn't get benefit of being SC. My father has done his 1st to 3rd SC. My father has done his 1st to 3rd from Maharashtra. My original caste I.e. from Maharashtra. My original caste I.e. beldar has been mentioned correctly in beldar has been mentioned correctly in his leaving certificate. While taking his leaving certificate. While taking admission in 4th class again my admission in 4th class again my Grandfather mentioned his caste as Grandfather mentioned his caste as Hindu. So my father 12th leaving Hindu. So my father 12th leaving certificate bear Hindu as caste. While certificate bear Hindu as caste. While giving me the admission in class my giving me the admission in class my caste has been correctly mentioned as caste has been correctly mentioned as Beldar . In my sister educational record Beldar . In my sister educational record also been mentioned Beldar. As my also been mentioned Beldar. As my records were correct I have obtained the records were correct I have obtained the Caste Certificate from SDM. Now sir my Caste Certificate from SDM. Now sir my question is: 1. Being a True SC question is: 1. Being a True SC beneficiary, should I apply for beneficiary, should I apply for government job. 2. My base is: I) I truly government job. 2. My base is: I) I truly belong to Beldar community as I have a belong to Beldar community as I have a community certificate also. My relatives community certificate also. My relatives are still doing job related to are still doing job related to our caste. ii) our caste. ii) my individual record is correct. my individual record is correct. It is It is worth to mention that my father didn't worth to mention that my father didn't benefit being SC as he didn't possessed benefit being SC as he didn't possessed the required documents nor he was much aware about that. When he came to know that government gives us benefits t then only he rectified my records.. records.. Please help me sir... I belong to a very normal family.
Anonymous
14 November 2014 at 08:43
Sir, I belong to scheduled caste in madhya pradesh (mp). My grandfather transferred to Sagar (mp) from maharastra in 1960. In his service record his caste would be either Hindu/Telugu as due to castcism he afraid of being SC. he didn't get benefit of being SC. My father has done his 1st to 3rd from Maharashtra. My original caste I.e. beldar has been mentioned correctly in his leaving certificate. While taking admission in 4th class again my Grandfather mentioned his caste as Hindu. So my father 12th leaving certificate bear Hindu as caste. While giving me the admission in class my caste has been correctly mentioned as Beldar . In my sister educational record also been mentioned Beldar. As my records were correct I have obtained the Caste Certificate from SDM. Now sir my question is:
1. Being a True SC beneficiary, should I apply for government job.
2. My base is:
I) I truly belong to Beldar community as I have a community certificate also. My relatives are still doing job related to our caste.
ii) my individual record is correct.
It is worth to mention that my father didn't benefit being SC as he didn't possessed the required documents nor he was much aware about that. When he came to know that government gives us benefits then only he rectified my records..
Please help me sir... I belong to a very normal family.
sureshkumar
14 November 2014 at 08:02
sureshkumar
advocate,high court,madurai,tamilnadu
dear members,
In the year of 2013 Honble C J P.Sadasivam avl gave a breaking judgement related a scavanger died when he was working in latrin tang cleaning the goverment give compensation amount of Rs 10,00,000/ to his family.
Now i want the judge ment and G.O
PLEASE HELP ME
1. Wife living separately from husband.
2. Wife refuses to live in the family of husband.
3. Wife claim maintenance from husband.
4. I have seen some judgments where judge offer two options to husband either to pay monthly maintenance or pay one time lump sum. e.g. husband will pay Rs 2000 per month as maintenance or onetime Rs 300000 as permanent alimony and husbands liability of pay maintenance will end.
Questions:
1. If husband wants to pay one time lump sum in spite of monthly maintenance without mutual divorce (wife did not want mutual divorce) then how to proceed?
2. If husband desire to pay lump sum then is there any adverse effect e.g. judge may think husband is richer.
3. How to convert monthly maintenance to one time lump sum alimony in court?
Pravin
14 November 2014 at 02:41
Hello
This is for one of my friends, his team leader is mentally torturing him, he does not give him leaves that are allotted to others, behaves with him in a diffrenet manner, dominant as he has all the data to prove him correct etc, can this be reported to police?
Sir,
How i can get a propriter code under trademark, because only after getting propriter code i can login to trademark site ?
Akki
14 November 2014 at 00:10
Hello Experts,
My mother entered into a partnership agreement for purchase and sale of land in Jharkhand with another Individual few years back with an initial investment of Rs 2.25 lacs. The other partner sold the land without my mother’s knowledge and didn’t report the profits, claiming there was no buyer available. Later, this fraud was unearthed and we asked the other partner to give us back capital and profits, which he denied and threatened my Mom with life consequences.
My Mom and Dad, both Sr. citizens and retired were scared; hence we shifted them to Bangalore sometime back. We’ve already filed a police complaint but no action has come up yet.
Few other points to note:
1. There seems to be an error in drafting the partnership deed as it doesn’t have any profit sharing clause. Instead it just has the capital investment amount given to the other accused partner for purchase of land in equal shares.
2. The Partnership deed has not been registered with the Registrar of firms.
I would want to know if I can file a case against the accused partner in Bangalore and if yes, then on which grounds? Also, how do I recover the capital (+Interest) and the profits from accused?
Many thanks.
My cousin's brother' wife has filed DV complaint and 498A against her husband, in laws and also against me. Her allegations are oral and routine in nature without any documentary proof. She alleged about physical assault by her husband, in laws and also by me. Thereafter making compalint 100 and written complaint to police. Till date documentary evidence i.e police diary report or written complaint filed after a lapse of almost more than 2 years. FIR is registered u_s 498, 406, 34 and IO filed chargesheet against us without diaclosing any material evidence against us except statement u_s 161. In fact her all allehations are never happened and does not exist. I am surprise as to how the IO has filed chargesgeet for those offences which actually never exist at all. Matter is listed for scrutiny of document and argument on charges. IO also wrongly mentioned my residential address as the address of her husband. My query - remedy available for me. I have RTI information provided by police saying that no incidence as alleged by that girl had ever happened, no 100 no. Call and no written complaint against me.
Regarding redevelopment.
Dear Respected Experts,
Our society in Mumbai has gone for redevelopment. 2 Towers have already been constructed on a plot that was available in the society and no member had to vacate the current premises.
It took the builder 6 years to construct the 2 towers which he promised he would do in 2 and a half years.
Now to expedite the process of redevelopment, the society is asking the members to go for one flat in the current phase when it starts and take the other flat in the next phase.(We have an agreement wherein we will get 2 flats for the current flat we hold. eg., if we have 1 flat of 500 sqft we will get 2 flats of 500 sqft after redevelopment of the society)
Looking at the builders track record and also the committee members malafide intentions, we have decided against going for this option.
But the society has taken signtures of many members who they have convinced to go for the option of 1 flat now and 1 later. But many of them are those for whom one flat itself will be double their current small flat, hence they will anyways get one flat, so it does not make any difference to them.
Now the question I want to ask is : Can the society force the members to go for the option of one flat now and the other later, if the member does not feel secured to go for that option as the member will give up the flat and take one flat, but what if later on the project gets stuck and we do not get our 2nd flat!!! as once our original house is demolished, it'll be difficult to run after the builder to get our second house.
The committee has called a special general body meeting next week seeking to pass a resolution, saying on the request of members, 1 flat will be taken in the current phase n the other flat in the next phase.
They are showing it as if the members have requested for the same whereas it is the committee members and their cronies who are going around trying to convince people to opt for one house now and the other later.
Would appreciate your valuable advise in the matter and thank you all in advance for spending your valuable time in reading my query.
Thanks.