Umapathy PS
12 December 2014 at 11:21
Dear Sir,
1.Persons those who are working in private Ltd company is it possible to enrole?
2.Persons those who are working in public Ltd company is it possible to enrole?
3.Persons those who are working in Govt.Employment is it possible to enrole?
I seek your views.
Thanks & Regards,
P.S.Umapathy.
Vilas Kambli
12 December 2014 at 10:49
Dear Sir,
I have signed agreement with my company for 3 years. In this agreement no clause in my favor of me. That means this agreement is all in favour of company.
Now after two years when I want to switch my job, they are asking money from me as per signed agreement.
If I will not pay the same they will not do any final settlement.
And this amount is much bigger than te money I need to pay to company.
Please let me know if I don't pay this money as per agreement then can I claim for full and final payment to company or not?
SRINIVASA
12 December 2014 at 10:44
The will is in probate court and out of 6 beneficiaries, 2 have filed objection and the probate is pending for the past 5 years. The property is in vacant posession and is not yield any income.
My query is whether the Executor can enter into lease agreement for letting the property since there is no revenue being generated for payment of taxes and maintenance of property. If he can, whether the lease agreement is binding on beneficiaries in future after probation of will
Kindly clarify
With regards
Srinivas
jigar suthar
12 December 2014 at 10:23
i have Genetics laboratory for partner ship but two partner are relese so i can not under stand how i convert pancard to propriter plz ans
Advocate Umesh
12 December 2014 at 10:03
An Immovable House Property purchased in the name mother of my client form funds of family business in 1983 for rs. 12,000/-. At that time son was of 14 yrs. age. Now after death of father in 2001, my client along with other two brother wants to partition of house property but the mother is not ready. so my client filled civil suit for declaration, injunction and partition. because he has already in possession. the mother also admitted possession of my client. now the market value of suit property is rs. 50,00,000/-. I argued before the court that suit for partition doesn't amounts to transfer but it will decide shares which have already exists to all co-parceners. in short in suit for partition no new right, intrest and title will create but only decide share of each co-parcener and specifically there is no prayer in my suit for possession. now the question is can a court make an assessment of court fee on current market valu which is in existence at the date of filling suit or the value as on 1983. because defendant mother's lawyer make objection in respect of court fee and submitted certified copies of market value from registrar. pl. resolve query in light of provision made in Bombay Court Fees ACT, 1959 because suit filled in sangli maharashtra. thanks.
p phipson
12 December 2014 at 10:03
An argument between members of a Housing Society resulted in a lady member pushing a male member who fell down. In turn, when he got up he pushed the lady member, she tripped & fell down but was not hurt or injured- in fact she continued with the argument with the other members as soon as she got up.
She has gone and filed a molestation charge in the police station against three male members; the Secretary of the Society, an aged 71 year old member and the person who had pushed her(the first two named were nowhere near her as can be confirmed by the Society CCTV as also about 10 other members who were present at the time of the altercation).
The Society has passed Resolutions condemning the behavior of the lady member in preventing Society work from being carried out.
The problem now is that the police have filed an FIR on "molestation charges" and keep harassing the three Society members by calling them to the police station repeatedly where they have to wait for hours and hours (till their seniors come according to the constables).
This harassment and the refusal of the police to let the three members see the contents of the FIR is sickening.
Can you please advise what should be done in this case
(the impression is that the petty inspectors want their pound of flesh; having already squeezed what they could from the family of the lady member to file this false FIR)
chandrabhanu
12 December 2014 at 01:14
Sirs,
My opponent has around 45 cases on him. He himself has accepted the same in cross examine of one of his recent case. But presently my suit is pending in high court. I can take the certified copies of the same. Whether high court will consider the certified copies. If not, what is the action which I can take to considered by high court. Also in one of other case of the judgement district court has been observed that the person will take the litigation of the properties on prima facie. If I submit the certified copy of the same, will high court consider it?
niky......
11 December 2014 at 23:59
This is a civil case of evac for false bonafied requirement by room owner. I am defendant and the case is currently in a stage of evidence filing by Plaintiff. Recently a person from Plaintiff's lawyer came to my house and asked to sign receipt of a letter copy. My father didnt signed as the letter hand writing was not readable and he couldnt get the content & hence he denied to receive the letter and asked that person to get a printed copy and agreed to receive then.
Shall i go to Plaintiff's lawyer and receive that letter? Also why will there be any need for sending any letter at my home?
Sharma
11 December 2014 at 23:56
I've only been 2 and 1/2 months into my 6 months probationary period and i gave a resignation. There was nothing regarding resignation notice period written in the offer letter which I have. I said I would give a notice of 1 month from the date of resignation. The HR after many mails from my side responded saying that the notice period according to the management is 3 months and they would relieve me only after 3 months and that to at discretion of the management. He then pointed to some HR-document that stated this fact which I had no idea of. When I said it is not written in the offer letter the HR said that the rule in the offer letter which says you shall be governed by the company laws applies.
First of all i find this unethical. This way you can put in and change any law and does it then suddenly apply to me?
That document also states that I can pay my basic salary in lieu of the notice period. But then again as everywhere in the company document it says this is only at management's discretion. I still said that 1 month is a sufficient notice period considering I resigned merely 2 and 1/2 mths into the job and still am willing to pay 60 days basic salary. HR still did not agree saying that it will not accept my basic and will not provide any relieving until 90 days that too at management's discretion.
I feel mentally harassed by this as I am unwilling to continue to work at all here. Is management's discretion so powerful that I am force to labor even if i dont want to ? After all probationary period is to gauge suitability by both parties right ?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
First agreement not registered
Dear Sirs,
Ours is a registered co-op. soc. in mumbai constructed in 1990. I have purchase a flat from Mr.A (first buyer) in 1996 and paid a stamp duty and got it registered. However, the first agreement between builder and Mr.A is not registered and no stamp duty has been paid on it.
Could I face any problem at the time of conveyance or resell of my flat? If yes, what is the remedy for it?
Thanks.