Raman
23 February 2015 at 16:02
Sir,
I need clarification about the surety bony deposited in regaulr bail bond and 437-A
My 3 relatives has taken regular bail before the Ld JMIC court along with sureties against certain charges of IPC..Since they have been framed outside the city and hence could not arrange sureties and thus they gave Rs 25000 per person in lieu of surety
Now they are facing trail..my doubts are:
1 If they convicted what happen to that surety money which they have given with perosnal bail bond for obtaining regular bail ? Whether the court confiscated that amount??
2 If they get acquitted whether they have to furnish the fresh amount in lieu of sureties for obatining bail under section 437-A Crpc?
3 can money i.e Rs 25000 which they have given at the time of obtaining regular bail be adjusted in the 437-A bail bond after being acquitted?
please give your valuable views
pushpendersharma1991
23 February 2015 at 15:59
Dear Sir, I am in trouble Actually I have joined a partnership firm in last Jan 2015. Every thing was going on good but Now suddenly my employer is asking for my resignation without any reason, because he is again rehiring our Ex. Accountant. who were left out his firm since Dec 2014. Now I am quite disturbed & helpless.
Sir, please suggest what should i do to get it out to this problem. Because I have nothing done wrong here. Inspite of that he is terminating me without any reason. I Have just a copy of my offer letter. Please suggest can I file a complaint in labor court against my employer. I want to teach him a bitter lesson.
srinivas
23 February 2015 at 15:50
sir
i work a autonomous body of govt of india.we want to hire comprehensive services of architect for construction of ahigh rise residentail building.
in this regard i would like to know whether is it madatory to follow rules staed in the ahdnbook of concil of architecture while advertisng tender for this service and not ask for EMd also.CVC guidelines are silent on this.request expert leagl opinion on this
K R Ranjan
23 February 2015 at 15:46
Dear Sir,
We as an ssi unit have taken fascilities of finance (TL and CC) from BOB in 2010, it was 2011 july when got a major setback in form of closure direction from Maharashtra pollution controll board(MPCB), as a mass action taken in this industrial area.
Allthough within a week we proved our bonafide to MPCB , but due to technical reasons we got the restart order after 5 months resulting in huge loss to our company.
Even in that situation we repaid all the over dues to our banker against their assurance of support in terms of enhancement and extension of fascilities.
But after clearing all overdues and regularising the account in March 2012, got a shock in form of refusal of banker.
Since then we tried our best to prove our bonafide with the banker and requested them to restructure the given fascilities but all in vein .
Banker has initiated the action U/S-Surfeisi act which has been challanged by us in DRT in due course of time.
But question remains unanswered that if there is no fault of borrower or, situation is beyond controll for a promoter , then whether banker can be forced to restructure the account by DRT ?
K R Ranjan
23 February 2015 at 15:23
Sir,
a case u/s-138 has been initiated against two partners of a partnership firm (located in Nagpur, Maharashtra)in gaziabad court in 2012 , since then complainent has not submitted the evidence which can prove his bonafide.
Being one of the partner i have been granted the bail and out of two partner only i was allow to represent in the case.
Since then two Judges have got changed and in last hearing when my counsel has represented for the dismissal of case , then only opponent counsel raised the question for bail of other partner .
In this situation myself alongwith my counsel pleaded for the transfer of case to Nagpur as per latest judgement of SC (cheque getting dishonoured at Nagpur), but judje is not ready to address the same.
It is resulting only harassment and waste of money.
Hence kindly advice your opinion on the issue.
PRASHANT
23 February 2015 at 15:19
Dear,
Greetings of the day. I am here for discussing a case . My grandfather was a zamaindar and in his life time in the year 1972 he made a Izaajatnaama to a person(we know that it is fake) to a person for a part of land..which he used and registerd his name in revenue records
My father filed a case against it, but my uncle who is mentally weak and a drunkard gave a statement in favor of the opposition that Ijaazatnaama is real and he recognises the sign of his father
After that we keep fighting case but unfortunately my father died in 1995..and as the other party were quite maafia type people..my mother and grandmother compromised for it
Now my questions are
1) Can IjaajatNaama which is unregistered can be used for registering name in RevenueRecords i.e khatauni
2) Is Ijaajatnaama valid in the year 1972..as zamindari no more exists
3) Do you find merit in my favor so that i can go in court now?
Please help with your precious suggestions?
Regards
GANGAM.RAJENDER.
23 February 2015 at 15:12
respected sir,
we are filed IA "NOT TO ALIENATE" in the O.S BUT it is dismissed in the Hon'ble District court .
PRESENT WE WANT TO CHALLENGE THE ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT.
Q1. WEATHER IT IS POSSIBLE TO CHALLENGE THE ORDER UNDER ART 226? AND WHAT IS THE LIMITATION TO CHALLENGE THE ORDER BEFORE THE HIGH COURT.
OR
CAN WE FILE CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL(CMA) IN 90 DAYS?
THANK YOU SIR
Rajesh
23 February 2015 at 14:56
SRA related queries - Check other thread on daily basis.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Mutation under a unregistered will
Dear Sirs,
If the corporation refuses to mutate the ownership of a property obtained under a "will" can we get a stay order from High Court,as ,even an unregistered "Will" is very much legally valid,when properly witnessed and executed and registration of a "Will"is not compulsory under the law????