Member (Account Deleted)
28 June 2015 at 10:11
Hi sir,my grandfather and my grandmother expired few years ago. My father is the only son. my grandfathers second wife and her children have also been included in legal heir certificate. For which they betrayed us with the property of my grandfather in tamilnadu. Now my father came to know there is 1 Acer of land in my grandfather name. To transfer it to my father name they are asking for change in legal heir certificate to my father name. Can we make changes in legal heir certificate or do we have any other way to get this.
vinay
28 June 2015 at 09:56
What is the full form of ‘APLST ’ in a Case No. APLST/XXX/2015 in Bombay High Court in a Criminal Case for Qaushing of FIR.
sumanth
28 June 2015 at 09:14
Hi, we were few bachelors gathered in rented room, we were talking late night 2:00 A.M. We had no loudspeakers, nor were we screaming out loud. In our rented place we were just talking. Few Police constables just barged in our room, started yelling at us saying they got a compliant and asked us to come to station. As we did nothing wrong we didn't agree to give bribe and argued, they threatened that they will put petty case on all of us and took our name and permanent address. My question is how can few constables put a petty case without any offence just like that? How constables simply barge in without any warrant or reason? If he puts a petty case what should we do? Will that affect our career? What should we do to save ourselves from such harassment? Please help.
aditya
28 June 2015 at 07:12
ek aadmi ko pahli patni se char Bache hain aur pahli patni ke rehte dusri sadi karli dusri patni koi Bache nahi hai to jamin ka hakdar kaun hoga pahli patni aur unke bache ka hak hoga ya dusri patni ko v milna chahiye aur kitna milna chahiye
Sashi Kumar
28 June 2015 at 06:48
I had a signed sale agreement with a buyer. Buyer started creating problem in giving money by making excuses. Buyer did not make any payment by the due dates specified in the agreement. So finally I gave notice and cancelled the agreement and forfeited the deposit. The contract clearly stated that if the buyer defaults then the money is forfeited.
After 3 years of the sale agreement date I transferred the property to my relative via gift deed. There was no stay on the property and no law suit pending.
Now I am getting information that the buyer is filing a law suit specific performance and for money recovery.
Can the buyer get a stay on the property which I don't own anymore?
Does specific performance work if I don't own that property anymore?
What can the buyer claim in this situation?
rameshpatel
28 June 2015 at 06:23
My Uncle is a NRI in Canada and he had signed a sale agreement with a buyer in India. His relative informed him that the buyer has filed a civil law against him for money recovery. It has been over 2 months and my Uncle in Canada has not received any notice or summon.
Does my uncle need to do anything or wait till he receives any notice or summon.
Please advice.
mohammad Tausif
28 June 2015 at 06:00
Hello,
1). I sold my property in 2007 to Mr. X, sighning an agreement concerning details of property and payment options.And received a major amount of payment within a year(not full amount yet).And no major clauses written on the agreement.
2). Now, in 2007 Mr. X sold or gave the possession to Mr. Y without my concern.
3. In 2007, the property was registered in my fathers name
In 2013, I got registered the property in my name through HIBA (as per MUSLIM law)
Does the agreement Still Valid?
Can I take my property back or not..???
Plz Help.....
Abdulla K T
28 June 2015 at 00:47
Sir,
I am Abdulla a sunni muslim from Kerala. i had one uncle(Brother of my mother) who hadn't married till death hence he had no children or wife in life.
But he owns some property received as heir ship form his mother(my grand mother).
his family contains 3 members (himself and tow sisters- one is my mother and one elder sister of my mother). My mothers sister has passed away before uncle died. and my mother still alive. Now my question is who are the legal heirs of his property.
and if it belongs to my mother how shall we claim it legally ie by which law or article)
pls reply
regards,
abdulla kt
A Barua
27 June 2015 at 23:27
a person has filed a FIR against me for having romantic feelings for his wife. But there were no physical intimacy involved as I never met her. I only spoke to her on phone as we live in different cities. I dont know whether he has really filed a FIR or just scaring me. How can I be sure and what should be my next step?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
N. i 138
Below is the Cabinet Approval . However, I am not clear whether this has become ordinance or not ?? Can a Judge use this ruling by cabinet and pass the judgment ?? How can I get an official copy to produce this in the court ?? Thanks and appreciate some inside on this information
Recently The union cabinet on Wednesday decided to promulgate an ordinance to amend the Negotiable Instruments Act to provide for filing of cases about dud cheques at places where these are presented.
"The cabinet has given its approval for the proposal to promulgate the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015," an official release said.
It said that the proposed amendments to the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ("The NI Act") were focused on clarifying the jurisdiction related issues for filing cases for offence committed under section 138 of the Act.
"The clarification of jurisdictional issues may be desirable as this would be in the interests of the complainant and would also ensure a fair trial," the release said.
It said that clarity on jurisdictional issue for cases of cheque bouncing would increase the credibility of the cheque as a financial instrument.
Section 138 of the NI Act deals with the offences related to dishonour of cheque for insufficiency of funds in the drawer's account.
The Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Bill, 2015 was passed in the Lok Sabha last month but could not be taken up in the Rajya Sabha.
The release said that the objective of the ordinance is to ensure fair trial keeping in view interests of the complainant by clarifying the territorial jurisdiction for cases for dishonour of cheques.