LCI Learning
Master NDPS 2.0: Latest Legal Developments, Best Practices & Landmark Case Studies

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

anisha   10 September 2015 at 10:03

seniority

Sir
Iwould like to know how would the seniority in a central govt aiims patna be determined in the folowing casewhere the applicants are called in batches after their selection
1st batch
Gen cat-rank-1-29
Obc-rank-113-127
Sc-rank-172-175
St-rank-202-205

2nd batch
Gen cat-rank-30-58
Obc-rank-128-145
Sc-rank-176-180
St-rank-206-210
Sir
Whereas i know that seniority is determined on order of merit and not on date of confirmation
How will the seniority of a person of rank 35 of 2nd batch be determined when rank 126 has already joind in first batch(both are selected from the same notification)

Anonymous   10 September 2015 at 09:12

Maintenance u/s 24 Hindu marriage act

Dear Experts,

A and B are the husband and wife.

divakar challa   10 September 2015 at 08:19

Type of agreement to be entered

sir I have got divorce through AP high court.I agreed to pay my wife Rs 14,00,000 as permanant alimony and they will not initiate any further litigation. However they are refusing to done the process through Lok Adalat. How the agreement is to be entered to make it a legal document and to avoid future troubles.

David   10 September 2015 at 03:35

Appeal time

I posted this same question earlier and was asked to post it in my previous thread. But did not get a response. Sorry to posting again now.

My question -Dear Experts District cout ruled in favor of me in granting divorce against my ex wife on 7.28.15. Already got to know from experts in Lawyers Club India that time limit is 90 days for apealing in HC from order received date. I got my order copy with prepared date as 8.21.15. Seems my ex applied for copy of order but havent collected it. From what date this 90 days will start. Either from 8.21.15 or from the date she receives the copy. Delay in getting the copy by my ex wife will be excluded or not. Please advise. Thanks in advance David

Anonymous   10 September 2015 at 02:10

Owner ship rights

I have an industrial roof shed in bhiwandi.i have been paying property tax in my name.i want to develop this property.Now the previous owner is claiming that u cannot develop this property above 16 ft height as he has mentioned this clause in sale deed.
Does he still has this right to interfere.

vinod.joshi   10 September 2015 at 00:45

sale deed on post dated cheques

Sir I have had deal of my property my remaining amount is 200000/- as buyer says to do datavej and giving me post dated cheques.I want to know if it bounced will I be able to get that money as once dastavej is done it can't be cancelled. Please guide me.

priyesh   09 September 2015 at 23:47

cognizable offenses and set aside orders

Please explain me the meaning of cognizable offense and non cognizable offense?

And also explain what happens when an appellate authority set aside an order?

sanjay   09 September 2015 at 23:25

Appeal in sessions court.

Respected Sir,
I am fighting a case u/s 498A in Rohtak.The lower court acquiited us and the other party has filed an appeal in the sesions court,Rohtak.Can the appeal against the order of acquittal be filed in the sessions court or High Court has the power to accept such appeal?Kindly advice.

suresh bhogle   09 September 2015 at 22:17

138 ni case

Hello to all distinguish members.
I have two questions.

1) What is limitation period in 138 ni cases? I had received cheque and cheque return memo from bank on 1-8-15 now i want to ask before which date i must file a case in the court?

2) Validity of latest Ordinance in 138 NI Act (ordinance passed on 15 june 2015) was only 6 weeks and now it ceases to be lapsed. Has the Government re-promulgated the ordinance? if ordinance has lapsed what happened to the cases which were filed within the 6 weeks during which ordinance was in force?

Really appreciate if you enlighten me on this.
Thank you very much to all.

syed niaz ahmed shah   09 September 2015 at 22:11

Arbitration

Arbitrator assigned between the petitioner and respondents and the petitioner is not regular and cooperating though he made submissions but is evasive to substantial matters of claims, and the case has taken three years for yet to go to evidence stage with the arbitrator while the respondents who are regular have asked arbitrator for finalization on the basis of respondents submissions and are ready to provide evidence and request the Arbitrator to give his award.

my query is can the arbitrator give the award on the basis of respondents as petitioner is not cooperating