ROJUKURTHI SUDHAKAR RAO
05 December 2015 at 12:31
To inform that the Assistant Director Town Planning ( ADTP) @ Municipality says that old plan approvals of aged Buildings of Housing Societies cannot be done by them . Secondly, District Collector for Building Plan Approval on the direction of the Registrar for deemed conveyance says such works are outside the purview of the District Collectorate .Thirdly, the Registrar for Deemed Conveyance having not given exemption of the Collector's Approval and the ADTP's Approval in case of the dissolved Gram Panchayat's approved Building Plans like that of our Society , the live Certificate obtained from the Municipal Ward Officer where our Society is situated and recognised as the Registered Housing Society Building for the last 30 years should become lawful and legal for all practical purposes like deemed Conveyance and must be given weightage. Thus, the Ward Officer’s Certificate is indeed the undisputable Document of Commencement , Completion and Occupation for a registered residential Society .
Please comment as to why a Ward Officer's Certification for Deemed Conveyance could be disqualified ?
==================================
Query by R .Sudhakar , Secretary , Cooperative Housing Society ,
5-12-2015.
shadab yadawad
05 December 2015 at 11:17
respected experts,
there was a civil suit regarding a agriculture land between my family and another family. The inferior courts have given the decisions in our favour as all records are in our name only, but Karnataka high court as given the decision in there favour in the year 2003, but which come to our knowledge in July 2015. and the still property is in our possession and government records also contains our name only.. and other party is still unaware of this fact. so plz tel me in this situation what we cam do?? to avoid future disputes. thanks in advance.
Ashutosh Pati Tripathi
05 December 2015 at 10:36
Respected sir
I live at village Tarkulwa of deoria district of uttar Pradesh. I have a property at my village in which some rooms are let out for shop purpose in which there is a tenant who is from my local village resident my father provide him a room for shop purpose without any advance and rent agreement. Recently my father told him to vacant my room because he is not paid rent last 6 months then quarrel with my father and remove his important instruments and stocks from the room but he left garbage of the electronic parts left in the room and lock the shutter. And also file a wrong case in the court of deoria district.
Kindly give a powerful suggestions to escape this headache.
Thank you Ashutosh Pati Tripathi
sudip jain
05 December 2015 at 10:01
Sir
Maine bank mein account open karaya tha to bank walo ne 100.00 ke blank stamp par mere signaturn kara liye kya mere signature ka misuse to nahi hoga.
arif
05 December 2015 at 05:53
Case detail
A FIR was registered against 3 accused in cow slaughtering act by Mr.X . He purposely added/ inserted a line in the FIR that when he catched us we opened fire at him( over writing is visible) . So three cases were registered. Case No. 1: u/s 147, 148,149,34 ,and 307 Case 2: U/s cow slaughtering act, Case 3: under arms act 30. Seizure were made and seizure memo was prepared in which the police seize meat, knives, car and gun, one live cartridge and one empty cartridge.
Three accused sent to jail. The police conducted an investigation and found that Case 1 is not made out as based on the bayan of 4 independent witness that there was no fire on site on anybody, no injury to anyone , no cow was slaughtered and only a pahari was hunted.
In case 1, the police submitted the FR to court.
In Case 2: The police sent the recovered meat to forensic lab to determine whether the meat belongs to cow and the report came that the meat does not belong to cow and its progeny. The police requested the court to convert the case in to wild life act u/s 9/51 ( Killing of Phari ( Neel Gai) by submitting the application under crpc 167 and the court took the cognizance and converted the case into wild life and then investigation officer (SI) filed the charge sheet in court u/s 9/51 against all 3 accused.
Case 3: The police filed the charge sheet against one accused only who has the licence of gun.
Later the police informed after almost 2 months informed the District forest officer to initiate proceedings for confiscation of car as the car was involved in carrying of meat of wild animal.
Now we are fighting the case (CrPC 239 revision at district judge Moradabad, JM rejected application U/s 239) on the following point
1) The FIR was registered in cow slaughtering act and when forensic report denied that the meat does not belong to cow and its progeny and nowhere the report indicate that the meat is of which animal then how SI can assume that the meat belong to a wild animal and can convert the case into wild life protection act U/s 9/51.
2) As per WPA 1972, NO court can take cognisance against the offence committed against this act unless the complaint filed ( As per section 55 of WPA) by chief conservator forest /DFO and related officer ( In our case , No complaint was filed by DFO or wild life officer). And police officer is not authorised to submit complaint or charge sheet as per section 55 of WPA 1972
3) Even police officer are not authorise to conduct investigation and record the statement of accused and witness as section 50(8) of WPA
4) Forensic report is not available that meat belongs to which schedule of animal as per wild life protection act.
5) Post mortem of the animal was not conducted so no report is available.
6) Vitenary surgeon report suggesting that the recovered meat is of wild animal is not available. Although he signed on the seizure memo and was available at the time of arrest and seizure.
7) Ballastic report of gun and animal is also not available.
8) Even as per independent witnesses bayan , that the pahari was hunted on that day. Pahari does not fall into any schedule given in the WPA schedule animal list. So how the wild life case can be made against us
As per merit I would like to know your opinion on the following
1) Can court authorise to take cognizance of wild case directly on police chargesheet.
2) Can court overlook and bypass the provision of act such as section 55 and section 50.
3) Can court without receiving the complaint from DFO or authorised officer initiate the proceeding of framing the charges against accused?
4) Can a court convict a person without any scientific proof or test report of meat
5) Can a police investigate wild life cases ( As per section 50(4) the police not below the rank of SI can detain, arrest, seize and search but as per act the investigation, recording of bayan, and filing of complaint only DFO, Chief wild life wardens etc are only authorise as per section 55)
6) Can I get relief from district court? What are the chance
7) If suppose district court reject, and if I file in 482 in allahbad high court , what are the chances of getting relief
8) Can you provide me references of section 55 in which court granted relief if the case is filed by police officer
Please note that still the charges are not framed
if you need any information further , plrase let me know
Regards
arif
BHARTI KOTHARI
05 December 2015 at 01:02
can court pass decree of eviction on the ground of non user ,merely on basis of electricity bill. can electric bill of less amount in the relavant period considered as final conclusion of continious non user.
Hamsa Dara
05 December 2015 at 00:38
Hello sir,
We have a flat in a chs in Mumbai. My father passed away 1 year back suddenly and has left no nominee or will behind. Due to certain financial issues in the family few years back there were some dues in the society maintenance charges. However we are now ready to clear the same and even want the flat transferred on my mothers name. We are 2 daughters and mother and have no issues in the flat being transferred to our mother. However the society is not taking any interest in flat transfer, moreover is not accepting the maintenance due. Pls help us know the transfer procedure in such case and the documents required.
Looking forward for your help.
Regards
Hamsa
rocky
05 December 2015 at 00:37
1.MR. ABC(HINDU) HAD FOUR CHILDREN - 1 SON (MARRIED AND LIVING WITH MR.ABC)& 3 MARRIED DAUGHTERS.
2.MR.ABC DIED IN THE YEAR 2007 LIVING BEHIND HOUSE (Made on Residential plot) WITHOUT ANY WILL.
3.HIS WIFE ALSO DIED WITHIN WEEK TIME.
4.AFTER EIGHT YEARS i.e. IN THE YEAR 2015 SON HAS STARTED DEVELOPING COMPLEX / BUILDING OVER THE SAID PLOT AND HAS DEMOLISHED THE HOUSE. HE IS HAVING PUT FOR SELL REMAINING FLATS AFTER COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
5.THE PLOT WAS WAS NEVER TRANSFERRED IN SON'S NAME WHEN THE FATHER WAS ALIVE.
6.HE HAS NOT OBTAINED ANY NOC OF HER THREE SISTERS
7.KNOW THESE SISTERS WANT TO CLAIM THEIR SHARE IN THEIR FATHER'S PROPERTY
A. MY QUESTION IS KNOW WHAT THESE SISTERS CAN DO AS THEY APPROACHED THEIR BROTHER AND ASKED FOR THEIR SHARE IN PROPERTY WHICH WAS IGNORED BY THEIR BROTHER.
B. IS THEIR ANY LIMITATION TO FILE SUIT FOR PARTITION
C. WHO CAN THEY STOP THIS CONSTRUCTION WORK
KINDLY ADVICE
Dipak
04 December 2015 at 23:55
A petitioner executed power of attorney to appoint advocate and for divorce proceedings in family court. The POA holder of the petitioner was not authorised to address the court, though the permission to engage advocate for the petitioner was sought by the power of attorney holder of the petitioner (instead of the petitioner himself/herself) before summons notice to respondent side. However, the family court granted permission to engage advocate for the petitioner to the power of attorney holder of the petitioner without hearing to respondent, before the summons notice to the respondent and without recorded the reasons for granting such permission. Then the power of attorney holder appointed the advocate and the advocate has presented the contested divorce petition in family court. The family court has not made any effort for amicable settlement between parties and the petitioner has not been presenting himself/herself in the family court till date but his/her advocate and power of attorney holder have appeared in court.
Respondent has objection/grievance about the order of granted permission to engage advocate for petitioner because- 1. The family court has ignored the fault of the petitioner for seeking permission to engage advocate not by himself/herself but by the power of attorney of the petitioner. 2. The order was made without hearing to respondent. 3. The advocate cannot be permitted in family court in normal circumstances. 4. The family court has granted permission without recorded the reasons for granting such permission.
Que: What possible steps can be taken by the respondent if he/she want to revoke the permission granted by the family court to engage advocate for petitioner?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
resignation from a police constable post
I wish to resign from west Bengal police constable and then to join other service . I get appointment letter on 30/11/15 but due to a police constable I can't join and they give15 day time and immediately i pray to accept resignation but There is nothing happen . If I not get resignation in stated time ,can I join to this new job? and if I join without resignation then what could be happened?