Bangalore
17 January 2016 at 20:48
I and my husband have a joint property in Delhi, where my husband is the first holder and I am the second holder. Recently my husband passed away. We have only 1 child, a daughter and I would like to give the house to her after my death.I have 3 questions:
1. Do I have to change the house registration again and change the papers only on my name, or can I continue with the same documents and assume that by default am the sole holder now of the property
2. To ensure that the house goes to my daughter after my death, should I write a will? Or should I get the house registered on her name as the sole owner right now itself or should I add her as an owner along with me. My intent is that after my death, she does not face any legal issues.
3. Ideally, with my husband gone, who are the legal heirs? Is it only me or are there others from his family who are also legal heirs like his real brothers, sisters or his father etc?
Manju
17 January 2016 at 20:11
In 1940, 6 members(lets say A,B,C,D,E,F) jointly purchased 1.05 AC land in Andhra Pradesh, India for construction of homes. In 1945, Among all, 3 members(A,B,D) exchanged their share with another 1 person(lets say G, who have land near to that place but in another survey number:proof for this is 2 exchange deeds between 1. B,D & G, 2. A & G with out mentioning any boundaries in A,B,D share).
After that, 2 members E(12 cents),F(12 cents+3 cents purchased land from C with boundaries) are enjoying
the land adjacently. The new person G (who have 3 persons share) sold remaining(don't know exactly how much but some vacant place is there) land to some other persons.
There is no partition deed among all 6 members.
C and his legal heirs don't possess any enjoyment in this number.
C legal heirs have their family partition deed mentioning 12 cents share in this land with out mentioning any boundaries.
F donated his 15(12+3 cents purchased from C) cents land to his son-in-law with mentioning boundaries,this person have 50 years enjoyment.
Now, C legal heirs objecting that my share comes here only hence don't construct anything here at F share place. Your share(F share) not come here, your share is at end of this land why because F is last person in deed. Is it true? Is there any law stating like that? Who need to go to vacant land either C legal heirs or F's son-in-law?
How can son-in-law of F construct any thing like fence/toilet etc in F mentioned land? Actually, 17.5 cents is share per one person. But, either E or F don't have 17.5 cents. F have 17.5+3= 20.5 cents but he he possessed 15 cents only. Lets say variation may be roads etc.
How C legal heirs objects F son-in-law? (All 6 members+ G also are passed away and their grand sons are alive now.)
Anonymous
17 January 2016 at 19:24
Court gave Ram Pal imprisonment of one year in my case 138 NIA ,Ram Pal apple in section court and compromised with me for payment of Rupees 3 lacks and paid 50000/- on the spot.balance with in one month.but he never paid balance amount.I again applied for justice in the same court but Ram Pal never come to court after Non- bail able warrants by court Now court Decided Ram Pal P.O.He was already decided P.O.in the same court but he got the bail from the court.
Can Ram Pal can get bail again from the court without paying me or Not ?
What should I do Now?
P.K.Verma
9888435700
Anonymous
17 January 2016 at 18:31
Why addressing someone as a Dalit is considerd to be defamation if constitution talks of equality in cast.According to our constitution there is no dicrimination on the basis of caste.On the other hand law punish a person of defamation if he addresses someone as a lower caste man.
Jj
17 January 2016 at 17:22
What is meant by adangal or A-register in kerala and is it necessary to check A-register before buying a land in kerala.
avtar singh
17 January 2016 at 16:09
My friend was imprisoned for 20 years under 376 D in a false gang rape case.how he escape himself.
JAIME
17 January 2016 at 16:03
Could any expert interpret what the following means:-
P.C.
Heard.
2. Issue notice to the respondents, with intimation that this matter is
likely to be disposed of finally at the admission stage.
3. The learned Public Prosecutor waives notice for all the
respondents.
4. Stand over to 12/02/2016 at 2.30 p.m.
Does this mean that the case is going to be decided against the Petitioner before admitting the case? what could be the remedy in such a case?
Thank You
jps
17 January 2016 at 15:15
A person is convicted for an offence under Dp act . six months later he is again convicted under same Dp act. However on deciding the quantum of sentence, his counsel argues that he has never been earlier convicted under similar Dp act and the judge doesn't put any capital or other punishment however let's him go after admonition. The io is present, who incidentally was also io in previous conviction. How to proceed with this contempt of cout and perjury. What more sections can be applied .
Ankit
17 January 2016 at 13:53
I have got a situation of my dearest friend who just got married 1 month back & had gone out of India (to country where he is working on contract & to countries nearby), for honeymoon, with his dear wife. It is an arranged marriage. Except bride & groom, all the family members stay back in India.
Girl has not been understanding & has rather been stubborn on her way of leading life instead of being responsible after getting married, which is expected by bride as well as groom, to start building relation.
There were disputes raised between the parents of my friend & his wife, due to rituals which needs to be followed after marriage on first festivals for 1 year after married life of the children, in which bride's parents have to gift 4 Pair of Clothes, sweets & sindoor. The same were already well informed by groom's parents to bride's elderly before the marriage & were also reminded after marriage.
These disputes led to the fact that girl came back from mid honeymoon period leaving the husband, and directly went back to her parents, which was considered by bride & his family, as an immature decision by the young girl.
But then, soon it was then identified that bride's father & mother had been unnecessarily alleging my friend's family on phone, for dowry and mental torture, which was shocking. It has been clear now that the prime motto of bride's family is to dominate groom & groom family or threaten financial implications by filing divorce FIR.
Now since things have gone even more worse & have proven to be eyeopener, I would like to get advice on how I can help my friend save his financial impact in case of divorce, which in current situation seems unavoidable.
(1) Which precautions should he take to safegaurd his property?
(2) Which Legal Rights can be in his favour if he lodges FIR before bride's family files the same?
(3) Can he transfer all his property to his own parents without any sale consideration?
(4) I have read about Sec 14 of Marriage Act, which denies divorce before 6 months?
(5) Which all claims can be made by wife after marriage of 1 month as right on property?
(6) Does it always have impact only on husband financially as well as mentally & there are no rights for husband getting / seeking divorced?
Kindly address these queries..
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Up zalr act 132 and land 117
Need order by sc and hc , abt encroachment on land lalr act 132 and 117 , and what is procedure to remove encroachment from goan sabha and procedures. Pls advice