Tushar Dangat
05 February 2016 at 19:54
My father owned new constructed flat 5 years ago possession date was 24 Jan 2011.On 16th Jan 2011 Saturday giant crashing sound from my bedroom where my wife got injuries.she was hospitalized for the week,luckily my 3 years old son was not their .He just moved to next room by 2-3 minutes before this incidence happened .
Mail ID: tushar.dangat7@gmail.com
Tushar Dangat
05 February 2016 at 19:51
My father owned new constructed flat 5 years ago possession date was 24 Jan 2011.On 16th Jan 2011 Saturday giant crashing sound from my bedroom where my wife got injuries.she was hospitalized for the week,luckily my 3 years old son was not their .He just moved to next room by 2-3 minutes before this incidence happened .
Mail ID: tushar.dangat7@gmail.com
JASWANT VIJAY AGNIHOTRI
05 February 2016 at 17:34
श्रीमान, वर्ष 1987 में राजस्थान में किसी आवासीय योजना के अंतर्गत अल्प-आय वर्ग में लाटरी के माध्यम से किसी व्यक्ति जो मोची (ST) का कार्य करता था, आवास मिला और 1997 का उसके नाम का आवंटन पत्र हैं । वर्ष 1999 से एक परिवार (OBC) उस मकान पर काबिज हैं । मकान के आवंटन सबंधित फाइल में जो पता फार्म भरते समय आवेदक मोची ने दिया था वह पता कबजाधारी (OBC) परिवार के रिश्तेदार का हैं ।
काबिज परिवार (OBC) ने एक मुकदमे में झूठा शपथ पत्र देकर कहा हैं कि वे किराए पर उस मकान में रहते हैं जबकि आजतक ना तो किराया दिया हैं और ना ही किरायानामा कभी बना हैं । उस मकान के मालिक का कहीं कोई पता नहीं हैं । पूछताछ और आसपास से एकत्रित जानकारी में सामने आया हैं कि किसी धोखाधड़ी के माध्यम से काबिज व्यक्ति OBC परिवार ने उक्त मकान पर कब्जा किया हैं जिसके बाद से जिस मोची व्यक्ति के नाम आवंटन हुआ था वह सदमे में या तो मर चुका हैं या परिवार सहित उस स्थान को छोड़कर चला गया हैं । मकान अभी भी उस मोची व्यक्ति के नाम हैं और उसके परिवार का कोई पता नहीं हैं । लोग उसकी हत्या की आशंका से भी इंकार नहीं कर रहे हैं क्योंकि आवासीय योजना के फार्म भरने के समय आवेदक (ST) ने मृत्यु की दशा में काबिज व्यक्ति (OBC) को भाई और नामिनी बनाया हैं । किसी मोची (ST) का भाई OBC में कैसे हो सकता हैं । काबिज परिवार पहले भी कई प्रकार की धोखा-धड़ी कर चुके हैं । एक दुकान पर धोखे से कब्जे का मुकदमा हार चुके हैं । ये झूठे दावे और पैसे के दम पर इस प्रकार का कृत्य करते आए हैं । इसमे दो परिवारों की मिलीभगत हैं जो आपस में पारिवारिक रिश्तेदार हैं ।
आपसे प्रार्थना हैं कि सही मार्गदर्शन करे तथा कानूनी प्रावधान और प्रक्रिया की जानकारी देकर उक्त काबिज परिवार की सच्चाई सामने लाने का उपाय बतायें साथ ही बतायें कि कैसे उस लुप्त परिवार को खोजा जा सकता हैं । पुलिस इस मामलें पर ध्यान नहीं दे रही हैं और टालमटोल कर रही हैं । कृपया इस मामले का प्रकार, न्यायिक प्रक्रिया और अदालती कार्यवाही का उल्लेख करें ।
Jayaprakash
05 February 2016 at 15:51
One of the builders which we have visited is confirming that apartment building which does not have any floors above G+ 5 Floors and are small buildings do not need OC and CC.
This will be cleared once akrama sakrama is passed.
Is this TRUE.
2. Also If the property has A-Karta and do not have oc CC and have small deviations.Can we buy those apartments? Will there be any legal issues in future?
Dharmendra More
05 February 2016 at 15:32
Dear Experts,
We are a pvt ltd co based in mumbai.We had given contract to a co who does civil works to do Epoxy flooring, wall coating and painting in our factory in the year 2010. We gave some advance to the co before starting the work for the material together with Purchase Order mentioning in the event of dispute the matter will be settled in Mumbai Jurisdiction. The co. completed did the shoddy job in context to Epoxy flooring as the flooring got peeled off within few days due to which our product which we manufactue and started receiving material returned from our customer. Because of this we suffered financial loss. We inform to the co.about this and Co sent their people to inspect and accepted that there was a flaw in the flooring job and assured us that they will redo the job which they did. But again the same problem repeated. Again they redid it again the same thing happened. Because of this we refused to pay them their outstanding money. They went to Micro small and medium council (the civil co is a small medium co)i Thane. While arguing there we informed the Council that it has no jurisdiction as the case is to be filed in mumbai jurisdiction. Irrespective of this, the MSME Council pass an order in civil co favour asking us to pay their outstanding amount together with interest three times than bank rate notified by RBI. Against this, we filed Arbitration Petition in the Bombay High Court. In reply to our petition the said civil co. filed an affidavit in the High Court saying as per Section 19 of MSME developement Act 2006 Bombay High Court has no jurisdiction and Thane District Court has a jurisdiction and 75% of the amount decided by the MSME Council should have been deposited in the Court else the the petition has no meaning.The section 19 of MSME development act 2006 is overriding section 34 of Arbitration Act.
In regard to this, can expert advise me as below :
1. Can Bombay High Court admit our Arbitration Petition on any ground.
2. If High Court admits the petition then do we have to deposit 75% amount of the total amount ordered by MSME Council.
3. Can we challenge in any Court of law in case High Court dismiss the petition.
Regards,
DM
Mysore Kapaniah
05 February 2016 at 14:37
Dear Sir, My cousins born and brought up in USA have executed deeds of denial of inheritance for their respective shares in a willed property located in Mumbai. The execution of the deeds were done in the office of Consulate General of India in Washington DC. Do these deeds have to be registered in Mumbai's sub registrar's office? If so what procedure.Shall be grateful your advising me.Regards
Dalip Singh
05 February 2016 at 13:21
in this case recovery has been shown to be effected at the premises where it has never been effected. The APP filed a copy of electricity bill showing that the applicant resides at the said address. The anticipatory bail is not considered since the investigation has barely taken off. Suggest the remedy available with me -
Should the applicant surrender and apply for regular bail?
Sri
05 February 2016 at 13:11
I have filed dv interim order appeal ,but the lower court asked me to pay arrears of maintenance which I paid . Wife has not appeared yet in my appeal . What is the fate of appeal then ,will appeal court ask wife to return the executed interim arrears amount of one lakh?
Please can someone guide me this ,I need to know this urgently.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Amount paid on hundi
Sir I have given some amount on hundi to a firm. On due date I.e. after 90 days he denies to renew or repay the amount what action we take so that we will recover our amount.