Anonymous
18 March 2016 at 19:56
Case booked u/Sec 394,365,211,34B of IPC 2 accused arrest by police. After 2 days 2 more accused surrendered before PI/IO atbPolice station. First 2 accuseds court grant 2 days PCR. After completion of PCR court send to MCR for 14 days. Thereafter accused apply for bail before the JMFC . court granted conditionally bail. My question whether,can I applied on behalf of 2 accused for bail on the basis of first 2 accused released by this hon'ble court on bail?if yes. Please give me case law or provision which applicable for this. Please provide your suggestions it is most important for me.
raghavendra
18 March 2016 at 18:45
seniors please help me.
i am working for PSU. at the time of applying i had given undertaking that i have not possessed the higer qualifications that graduation. after confirmation i have submitted my higher qualifications for incorporate in my personal records. comany has leveleed the charge sheet againt me now for suppression of fact. please help me all.
thank you
PRADIP PATWARDHAN
18 March 2016 at 18:37
Dear Experts
Following are my queries..
if one pvt ltd Company has taken a business loan (packing Credit for export) from bank for 3 years against primary hypothecation of stock and collateral security of Factory building. At that time company had paid stamp duty on value of hypothecated property.
Now the same loan become due for renewal and there is no change in loan amount as well as property mortgaged. in this case 1)whether stamp duty is applicable against renewal of same loan?? AND
2)is stamp required for personal gurantee??
Kindly reply urgently..
Mohammed Vaid
18 March 2016 at 18:37
Hi,
My children schools are forcing us to purchase books, colors, folders, socks, shoes, etc from them only. They are charging almost 200-300 % of the actual price, at which these items are available in market.
Please help me with any reference, if any rule is there in Indian constitution or any ruling given by any court against such kind of forcefulness.
GR Gupta
18 March 2016 at 16:07
Sir, I have purchased a flat in Gurgaon. There is no basement parking for the block in which my flat is located. The builder has charged me money for allotment of a open car parking space. I filed a complaint in Consumer Court against this on the basis of Hon'ble Supreme Court Judgement in 2010. Although the decision of the Consumer Court is awaited, the lawyer of the builder is taking the plea that this open car parking space has been purchased by the buyer at his own choice and the open car parking space is a part of approved building plan which was approved in the year 2004.
Please suggest whether the builder, who has approved plan of the society in the year 2004 can sale the open car parking on this basis after the judgement of he Apex Court.
neeraj
18 March 2016 at 15:33
Sir in my criminal case there are 12allegation out of which 11 are against me but in one there is no evidence against me and it is against another person but he is not made accused by prosecution and also by investigation officer and now the case is on framing of charge so can I move application for section 319 to make him accused also before framing of charge.
bhavesh bhanshe
18 March 2016 at 15:31
hi i am bhavesh bhanshe living in kurar village, malad east, mumbai 400097, having query regarding slum in mumbai which is 1 + 1 chawl (slum). my room is on 1st floor. builder who has taken sra project in my area says 1 st floor is not coming in sra project. i am living there from 1986 in pagdi system 1+1 chawl.
is the 1st floor eligible for sra?
builder can allot the flat?
or
what should i take action for my right?
N.MOHAN
18 March 2016 at 15:20
IN EP COURT, I CAN FILE A SET ASIDE PETITION FOR THE ARBITRATION AWARD UNDER SEC34
YP
18 March 2016 at 14:06
My wife had an accident with a kid one year back. Though it was not at all her fault as all of a sudden that kid jumped on to the road and came under the front bumper and she suddenly applied the brakes. The kid got little injured and got injury in his foot. She immediately took him to nearest hospital but that hospital referred the kid to other hospital after first aid and then his parents took him to other hospital without telling us.
As we did not know the kid and his family so we could not catch up with him. Later we got a notification from police that FIR has been filed against my wife under section IPCs 279 and 337. Police impounded our car for 1 day and released on superdharinama and took the RC and driving license of our car. We have searched for kid’s details in FIR and found him and found him OK and again confirmed later, he became fine after few weeks. From last 1 year, IO saying he is not getting health status report from the hospital. As per IO, treating hospital says report will be given by first aid hospital but the hospital where first aid was given says it will be given by treating hospital. So IO is saying he cannot proceed with the case until report has been issued by hospital. It has been more than a year now, shall I believe on IO statement? What should I do to recollect my RC and DL? What best can be done now to get rid of this case?
Thanks in advance.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Want to explore what cases can be filed while 498a & dv is still on?
Dear Lawyers,
After FALSE 498a and Domestic Violence cases is filed by the woman and subsequently only 1 hearing done in last 19 months We have lost confidence in JUDICIAL SYSTEM.
I fail to understand why LAWYERS are hell bent upon suggesting these DRACONIAN LAWS to TREACHEROUS and EVIL WOMEN when they clearly know that these laws are biased
and are once sided and are ANTI MEN. WHY DO YOU WANT TO WORK AGAINST YOUR OWN RACE i.e. MEN just for few thousand rupees?
WHY DO LAWYERS act against their OWN RACE i.e. MEN when they know it is MEN who are suffering under these draconian laws!
Least the Lawyer could do is to not suggest these UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS to bad woman.
Just earn few thousand rupee and you turn a MAN's life to PERIL that too suggesting laws to WOMAN who most of you clearly know that she is extortionist and is filing a false case!!
Okay lets now come to main point:
==================================
Since Judiciary is so slow and we were waiting for outcome of DV case so that we could go ahead and file DEFAMATION and other sections as researched by us.
My QUERY is that can we go ahead and file following section while the 498a & DV is still on?
We have done following research and can provide documentary proof under following section:--->>
IPC 499– Defamation
IPC 211 and 511 (Both)
211:- is applicable (when a false 498a case is going on i.e. UNDER TRIAL)
IPC 177– Furnishing false information (to any public servant)
IPC 181/182– False information, with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person
IPC 191/192– Giving false evidence (offence of giving false evidence)
IPC 199– False statement made in declaration which is by law receivable as evidence.
IPC 200– Using as true such declaration knowing it to be false.
IPC 361– Kidnapping from lawful guardianship.
IPC Section 120A Criminal Conspiracy:
I live in mumbai while the case is filed in PUNE by my Brother's wife who implicated us all to grab the property etc after her affair was caught red handed with pictures. Her maintenance is already denied by DV court as of now.
We want to file these cases (Myself, & my parents) from Mumbai so that she gets taste of what it means to bring us to Pune with false cases.
* At least we are filing a genuine case.
ALSO YOU MUST UNDERSTAND THAT YOU ARE GOING TO DEAL WITH A VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE PERSON HERE who like to work along with lawyer to fight their cases.
Although I am not a LAWYER but I have a sharp mind and can help the LAWYER INVOLVED in all steps as needed and MOST OF OUR GROUND STUDY IS DOCUMENTED AND IS VERY TIGHTLY described along with all proofs.
So those who think can talk to me in PERSON to get this going can respond to me on this query asap.
ALSO I WILL NOT PAY CONSULTATION CHARGE till we decide to hire you to go ahead and file cases after all the commercials are negotiated.
Thanks